June 25, 2026 · 26,827 words · 19 speakers · 181 segments
Thank you. Secretary will call the roll. Alan, Alvarado Gil, Archuleta, Araguin, Ashby, Becker, Blakespeare, Cabaldon, Caballero, Cervantes, Choi, Cortese, Daly, Durazo, Gonzalez, Grayson, Grove, Hurtado, Jones, Laird, Limon, McGuire, McNerney, Menjabar, Nilo, Ochoa Bogue, Padilla, Perez, Reyes, Richardson, Rubio, Ceyarto, Smallwood Cuevas, Stern, Strickland, Umberg, Baladaris, Wahab, Weber Pearson, Weiner. A quorum is present. Would the members and our guests be on the rail and in the gallery please rise? We will be led in prayer this morning by our chaplain, Sister Michelle Gorman. after which please remain standing for the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
So let us not forget that we are always in the presence of holy mystery. God of the present, past, and future, we gather in this present moment to marvel at the mystery of our being. The poet Liesel Mueller in a poem called Alive Together says, Speaking of marvels, I am alive together with you when I might have been alive with anyone under the sun. Our chances of being alive together are statistically non-existent. Still, we have made it. alive in a time when rationalists in square hats and hatless others agree it is almost over and so gracious God we ask you to give us the grace to know that we are the ones we've been waiting for the ones to forge ahead with courage when success is not always evident the ones to offer hope when the many are on the brink of despair the ones to recognize that love is stronger than fear indifference and even death and so we give you thanks for your mysterious presence as we go about in our inexplicable ways building the future of the golden state and building the universe amen
Thank you. Thank you so much. You know, all good things come to an end, and so I'd just like to take a few moments of personal privilege to thank you, senators and staff and sergeants, for the honor of serving you for the past 11 years This was not supposed to be that long but I also wanted to say that personal privilege word for a good while I started out with Senator Kevin DeLeon and I remember in his swearing talk he said that we are all pro And so I think my tem is up right now, even though I thought I would be finished with him. but then there was Senator Atkins and Senator McGuire, and now Senator Monique Limon as pro tem. So you definitely need a break from me and a new face around here. I can truly say I have been blessed by my time with you. Senator Nilo over here one day said, you bless us and we bless you. And actually, he was totally correct. I have been blessed. I have learned a whole lot. I think I've learned to be a better citizen. I've learned to be concise when I make a little prayer. I appreciate the interfaith, intersexuality. I don't think that's the right word, but you know what I mean. Interculturality, in a word, the diversity of all that makes California great. and so I'm inspired and grateful for your dedication to the common good and we will keep on doing the goodness, compassion and justice for all and please know you will be in my poor prayers with gratitude and love. Amen. Please join me in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation and another, indivisible, with liberty and justice for our all. Members, without objection, Senate Rule 55 is suspended to allow a guest on the floor for today's floor session. Moving to privileges of the floor, we do have some introductions of guests. Senator Pro Tem Lamone. You are recognized for your special guest.
Thank you. Thank you, members. Colleagues, today we honor and welcome distinguished delegation from the Japanese Chamber of Commerce of Northern California and the Japanese Business Association of Southern California here to our chamber. Leading the group are Mr. Arya, Senior Vice President of the Silicon Valley branch of Marabuni American Corporation and Vice President of the JCCNC and Mr. Hirika, the Vice President of General Administration and Reservation at All Nippon Airways, who is President of the JVA. They are in the capital today with their respective organizations annual visit to discuss issues of importance to our Japanese business community The Japanese business community have brought to California over 130 jobs and contribute about $50 to $100 billion per year to the state's GDP. Please join me in warmly welcoming the distinguished guests to our California State Senate.
Thank you. And if you would like to join in a picture, please make your way to the back of the floor. As members gather, we will take a group picture. Thank you. Members, moving on in privileges of the floor, we do have another introduction. Majority Leader Senator Ashby, you are recognized from your desk.
Thank you, Mr. President. I rise today to commemorate the formal establishment of a sister city partnership between the city of Sacramento and the city of Morelia, Mexico. Today, we welcome a delegation of government, business, educational, and community leaders from Morelia who join us on the floor and also in the gallery. Morelia is the capital and the most populous city of the Mexican state of Michican, which is the home of Mr. Silva and his family. The city was founded nearly 500 years ago and in 1991 was recognized as a UNESCO, UNESCO World Heritage Site. Last July, a direct flight between Sacramento and Morelia Open making travel and business and family interactions easier and more convenient for our regions. California is home to nearly 2 million people with roots from Michucan and approximately 300,000 Sacramento residents who trace their roots to Morelia and the state of Michucan. This sister city designation reflects a shared commitment to strengthening economic educational and cultural ties between two already related regions Please help me in welcoming the Morelia delegation including Alfonso Jesus Martinez Alcazar who is president of Municipal of Morelia, Susan Melissa Vasquez Perez, who is the Municipal of Morelia, and Gilberto Morelos Favilla, who is a council member of Morelia, and also Also joining them from the city of Sacramento are a couple of my favorite people, the Vice Mayor, Corina Talamantes, and the Mayor Pro Tem, Eric Guerra. Please join me in welcoming them.
Pro Tem Lamone, you are recognized.
Thank you members. Bienvenidos. We are honored to have you here with us as the delegation visiting from Morelia, Michoacán. Morelia is one of the most beautiful cities in Mexico. It has a historical landmark and they still preserve many of the things that make it unique, including its cathedral, the historic center, and the aqueduct. Beyond the beauty of Morelia is also the fact that it's a major agricultural producer of avocados, figs, pineapples, mangos, and guava. The delicious and the beauty. Bienvenidos al Senado. We welcome you here to California today.
Very good. Senator Padilla, you are recognized. And distinguished colleagues, thank you to the Pro Tem and esteemed Majority Leader. I rise as the Chair of the Senate Select Committee on California-Mexico Communication and Dialogue. Bienvenidos a todas y todos. Somos los norteamericanos, no? I think it's important to recognize the unique symbiotic relationship that we share with our brothers and sisters and family in Mexico. Economic, social, environmental, resource. We live in a time when the political inclination is to suggest that being divided is better, that finding differences are better. But the reality is our lives and our fortunes and the future of our children are all inextricably linked together. We are brothers and sisters. We are family. And our destinies must be borne out through understanding, respect, and collaboration. And in that vein, I thank you both again. I thank my leadership and welcome you with my whole heart. Senator Ochoa Bogue, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, I would like to wholeheartedly welcome the delegation from Morelia, Michoacán. De parte del Partido Republicano del Senado, les extendemos una gran bienvenida a esta plataforma. Y gracias por estar aquí. Y será un gusto en conocerles hoy. Senator Rubio, you are recognized. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen of the Senate. I also want to rise to welcome our friends. And I want to say a few words in Spanish, since most people have welcomed them in English, if I may. Bienvenidos. Queríamos darles con un orgullo recibirlos aquí en el Capitolio Thank you. Senator, is that it? Okay. Let's welcome them once again to the floor and do pictures. All members, if you would like to join in the back. Thank you. Welcome to the California Senate. Thank you. Thank you. Members, moving on in privileges of the floor, we do have more recognitions. Back to Pro Tem Lamone, you are recognized. Thank you. Members, we heard from Sister Michelle Gorman for the last time this morning, and we want to honor the work and her legacy. For 11 years, for 11 years, Sister Michelle has offered thoughtful words of wisdom to this chamber. Her impact in the Senate started long before she offered her words to us. Sister Michelle left her home in County Mayo, Ireland, 55 years ago to start the journey here in California and to enter the Sisters of Mercy in Auburn. She began her ministry as a teacher aide at Our Lady of Fatima School in St Joseph Parish while also studying scripture supporting the community and joyfully reflecting in prayer and contemplation Sister Gorman attended Sierra College Dominican College in San Rafael, and finally Sacramento State University where she earned her Bachelor's of Arts degree in Humanities and French. She also received her teaching credentials. Sister Michelle devoted 15 years to teaching first at Holy Spirit Elementary School. She then served at Bishop High School, where she taught English literature and she taught students about the Senate. She also taught English, literature and composition, yearbook and composition and rhetoric courses at Christian Brothers High School. Continuing her pursuit for educational growth, Sister Michelle returned to school to earn her master's degree in English and American literature from Gonzaga University in Spokening, Washington. After this, she became a vocation minister to work with women across this country, including women in Northern California, in Washington, in Oregon, in Idaho, and Montana. In 2004, Sister Michelle was elected to the leadership team of the Auburn Regional Community. In 2008, she joined the West Midwest community in Omaha, Nebraska, where she spent five years faithfully serving her ministry while caring for those who were sick, poor, and underserved. Throughout her journey, Sister Michelle has remained committed to personal and spiritual growth. She earned her diploma in spiritual direction at the Shalom Spiritual Guidance Program in Maryland, and she studied Spanish at the Cultural Institute in Oaxaca, Mexico. Sister Michelle has been part of so many communities in this world, and we've been lucky to have her as part of our community here in the Senate. When she returned to Sacramento, she joined us. And for the time she's been with us over the last 11 years, she has brought compassion. She has brought grace. She has brought perspective to this chamber. Her prayers have comforted us. They've also been words that we needed to hear during difficult moments. They've grounded us during challenging debates. and reminded us of our shared responsibility to serve the people of this state. Sister Michelle, thank you. Thank you for your unwavering dedication, for sharing your wisdom, your beauty, your prayers, your kindness to this Senate floor. On behalf of the California State Senate, please accept our deepest gratitude and appreciation. You will be greatly missed. We wish you the best in your new chapter and we congratulate you on building an extraordinary career of service to so many communities across this globe we are thankful to you as are the people of the state of California Senator Ashby, you are recognized from your desk.
Thank you to our presiding officer. And I know many people want to say kind and wonderful things about the lovely sister Michelle Gorman. I just want to say that, and I know you're all sick of hearing this from me, but this is my constituent and I love her deeply. And you should know that outside of these chambers, as part of the Sisters of Mercy, she is beloved by her peers. I am very close friends with one of her good friends, Sister Libby, who runs Loaves and Fishes and arguably is the person most on the ground serving those in the most need in this region. And that group of sisters, that includes Sister Michelle and Sister Libby, they really are a true force to be reckoned with in this region, outside of this building, on the streets of Sacramento. So I know she's leaving here. I'm going to miss her deeply. I look forward to her prayers. But know this, there is no doubt in my mind that she, along with her sisters, will be out there continuing to work really hard in this community. And I'm grateful that they found you. Great, good, good on Kevin DeLeon for bringing you in, and wise of all the others. How lucky are we to have had these 11 years with you. Thank you so much, Sister Gorman.
Senator Nilo, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. The pro tem explained well Sister Michelle's substance, background, achievements, all of which she brought to us here. She'd been here for a while before I got here, but just like I share Sacramento County with our majority leader, I share Sister Michelle as a constituent, but she invited me up to have lunch with her sisters up in Auburn last year, year before, and one thing, if you're at all close to the Catholic Church, you will know, as I do, that sisters are funner than priests. They really are. I had a wonderful time. They have a great sense of humor, and while she doesn't show her sense of humor necessarily, here she shows her her wisdom, theologic wisdom, but she does have a great sense of humor. And I have a gift that I will bring. It is a little bit smaller than that bouquet you received from the pro tem, but it has every bit as much respect and affection as that one does. And as you said before, You bless us and we bless you forever, forever.
Senator Richardson, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. Sister Gorman my entire educational career K was in Catholic school And my mom sent me to Catholic school even though my father was a public school teacher because I could get whipped each day. You could still get a whipping in Catholic school. And so, needless to say, I got them each day, and then I got one when I got home. I'm sure some of you aren't surprised to hear that. And I think anyone, I remember very early, I think part of my desire to serve publicly was we were taught to bring our change to give to the poor and to people in other countries. And I started stealing money out of my mother's pocketbook. And the nuns had to tell my mother, I don't know why she's giving $10 and we just want change. but it was really learning and understanding the needs of other people that built that inside of me of wanting to give and wanting to help. And then consequently coming here about a year and a half ago, I was comforted to, I felt like I was kind of in the same place. So you bring a lot of safety to us, a lot of peace to us. Before we know we're going to have some very hard conversations. so enjoy your time. Thank you.
Senator Grove, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. Sister Michelle, I just want to tell you that you've been a light. You really have been a light. Sometimes I feel like this place is so dark, but every time we come to the chamber, you speak truth from your heart. You're kind. You're compassionate. You let the Lord's light shine through you. but I think the biggest gift that you have is unconditional love you don't care if we're Democrat or Republican you don't care what our policies are you just have unconditional love for all of us and I think that's one of the greatest gifts that you have so as you leave, I just have this to say over you may the Lord bless you and keep you may he make his face shine upon you May he turn his face towards you and give you peace. And may he remember all your sacrifices, give you the desires of your heart, and let all your plans succeed in this new adventure that he has for you. And thank you for blessing us.
Senator Padilla, you are recognized.
Thank you very much, Mr. President and colleagues. Sister, thank you. We do have chosen to serve in a way that requires us to get uncomfortable with one another. with our differences often. It's painful sometimes. It's easy to lose sight and lose perspective. And every time you would pray with us, you would impart wisdom. You embody to me all that is implied in the word, sister, by the grace of God connected as family from him, always there, ready to support, be seen, to remind, to guide, to admonish, to bring us together, to remind us that we all are really family. Mr. President, permission to read?
Without objection.
Thank you. Proverbs 7.4. Say to wisdom, you are my sister, and to insight, you are my close, close relative. You have imparted such. You are our sister. Thank you, and God bless you.
Senator Smallwood-Cuevas, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. Sister Michelle, it's been Such an honor to sit right in front of your desk. And sometimes you would give me that look, which would remind me of my early Catholic upbringing because we were at the front of the class. But what I always appreciated about your prayers was that, I don't know, it was the grace of God that gave you insight on what the rhythm and flow of this chamber would be. and your prayer spoke so directly and intentionally to the struggle every single time. I really appreciated how you reminded us about equity, how you always talked about diversity, about reminding us about the least of us and our responsibilities. You really, I think, helped us remember the Christ in all of us, the Christ-like spirit in all of us. So I want to say thank you, wishing you the very best. I want to continue to reach out to you, and I feel like we need to get those prayers in a book so that we can remember, as I told you over dinner, I think that is so important for us to remember and something this chamber should think about. But thank you for your service, and it's been a pleasure to get to know you over the years.
Senator Gonzalez, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. And Sister Michelle, I just cannot say enough about how incredible that you are. I've been in this chamber now for seven years, about a week ago, spent my seventh year, and you've been there all along. Another Catholic schoolgirl here, I felt like when I came to this chamber I had to button it up around the nun. Well, not with you, because I knew how humorous you were, especially with Bernie. Bernie and you and the banter just made me feel how comfortable it was around you, how you didn't judge, but you let people feel included. And in this chamber, as my colleagues mentioned, how difficult the times have been, especially last year, dealing with the insurmountable challenges that faced, especially our Latino community as the Latino caucus chair. But coming in and starting fresh with the day, daily prayer, that many of the senators, I realized, kept with them. So I think, as my senator, a good colleague from Los Angeles, mentioned, having a book with her prayers might be really, really beneficial for us all to kind of look back and reflect and just thank the words that you've imparted on us and thank your service, not just to us, but to the state of California. We appreciate you.
Senator Hurtado, you are recognized.
That's a great idea. Thank you, Mr. President. sister michelle i know that wherever you stand i know you will be the soul of that place because you have been the soul of this place and i want to thank you for sharing your light with all of us
senator stern you are recognized yes i just wanted to add my gratitude and um
um there's a a phrase in the talmud that says uh where where you find god's greatness there you find his humility you embody that and it passes through you and you don't announce yourself so it's odd to put all this attention on you and I hope it's good and uncomfortable to get lauded with all this praise but we're going to make you sit here and absorb all of our love because we never get to say it this way to you so I just say thank you you wrote my wedding proposal and you didn realize it but you made a prayer the morning I proposed to my wife and I stole it Yeah, and it worked. And you talked about some kind of big magnet in the universe pulling us all towards love. And that's what you've done to us. So thank you.
Senator Archuleta, you are recognized.
Thank you. Sister Michelle, you make us all feel like little children. When you're up there giving a prayer, we better listen. And I remember my time in Catholic school that when the nuns spoke, we listened, or there was that ruler. And I don't know if there's one back there or not, but if there was, I'd sure like to give it back to you. because you held it over our heads many, many times by giving us wisdom, prayer, but it made us feel like we turned the clock back when we were doing our first communion and our confirmation. And it was the nuns that taught us about our faith, our religion, but taught us about forgiveness, and forgiveness, which all of us have got to ask for so many times in so many ways, that forgiveness is also a blessing. But because we represent a million people each, we also share the hope and love that you've given us with everyone. And I want to tell you on behalf of the veterans that you loved so dearly, I want to thank you for the prayers because they mean so very much. God bless you. Your journey is not over. There will be another blessing waiting and many, many more to come. The good Lord is not ready for you, but we are, and we thank you. God bless you.
Senator McGuire, you are recognized.
Thank you so much, Mr. President and members and Madam Pro Tem. I'll be brief. We love Sister Michelle, and I'm going to try to get through this without getting a little emotional. We love her because she is real. We love her because she is authentic. And no matter the day that she is having, she always puts you, puts other people first. she's been a bright light in some of our darkest days in this Capitol and in this state. Civil unrest, wildfires, and I think that we can all agree there are days in this Capitol that are so challenging. But then there's the bright light in the Senate. What I love about Sister Michelle, she also speaks to the moment. She always knows what to say and how to care for others. I describe Sister Michelle as kind. She leads with her heart. She's so caring and empathetic and you're people driven. And Sister Michelle, we are so lucky that you've chosen the Senate as part of your journey. And this state is stronger because of you. Love you so much.
Senator Rubio, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. ladies and gentlemen of the Senate and of course Sister Gorman what an honor to have spent the last eight years in your presence we all need a steady hand and you represented that every time we come into this chamber we don't know what's going to happen on the floor but we do know that with your blessing we better people on this floor and we look forward to seeing you every week your legacy is always going to be with us but we want you to know that you respected you valued you loved and we all have felt your presence, your warmth, and your inspiration in so many different ways, as shared by my colleague, as he proposed to his wife. But know that you've touched everyone, including staff and everyone that's watching. We don't know how we're going to move forward without you, but please know that we always want you to come back. This is your home. Congratulations on this new chapter of your life, but please know that we wish you the very best. Senator Weiner, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. Sister, I'm now in my 10th year, and I can't imagine this floor without you. I just associate at you with your fixture here and it's going to be a big hole in the Senate. And although I know we will have an amazing successor, but you are irreplaceable. And the one thing that I want to point out is that a theme that runs through all of the prayers that you've delivered here on the floor is humanism. And I think a lot of times in the legislative process, it gets very technical, talking about a lot of legal doctrines and technical phrases, and it gets very legalistic. And of course, we have to get the details right. but overlaying all of it and we always have to remember that it's about people however technical a debate is it's about people and people's lives and the quality of their lives and the sustainability of their lives and treating people like full human beings and you always have brought that to the Senate floor as a reminder every time we are here in this body So thank you so much for your incredible service.
And Senator Durazo, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. Well, I rise to honor someone who has served as our spiritual director and a moral pillar of this body since 2015, the first woman religious to serve as Senate chaplain. How's that? Big applause, big applause. First woman religious. You've opened our sessions not just with words, but with intention. You rooted us in our faith, however that may look like for each of us, a faith that does justice, that calls us to care for the most vulnerable, to see the dignity in every single person, to care for Mother Earth and to lead with love. And in your words that you said here in June of last year, you reminded us to have courage when you're frozen into inaction, have humility when misunderstood, and have a spirit of solidarity with those who are marginalized and seeking justice. Your presence has been such a gift to all of us. Pray for us as we carry your spirit forward in the work we do for the people of California. personally I always look forward to hearing you to seeing you every single every single day I always look forward because I knew that you are a woman not only performing your duties here with us but you have your own struggles in an institution dominated by men And I loved hearing little stories about that how women religious fighting for our communities in that institution I want to thank you, Sister Michelle. You always was someone I look forward to talking to. And also I want to thank you from Senator Eloise Gomez-Reyes. She's sorry she couldn't be here this last day that you were here, but she sends very special greetings, a hug, and love, and we love hearing funny stories. As Senator, my colleague, said earlier, you always made us laugh, but you always reminded us what our real purpose in this chamber was, and that is to serve. Thank you. We love you very much.
Mr. Sister Michelle Gorman, we give you honor today. Thank you for your service to the Senate. And if you would like to join for a group picture in the back, members, make your way. Thank you. Thank you. Members, we have a very special guest with us today. The Majority Leader Ashby's aunt from Oregon is visiting with us today, Rochelle Ashby. So glad that right in the back of the chamber. Welcome to California Senate chamber. Messages from the governor will be deemed read. Messages from the assembly. Secretary please read. Mr. President, I am directed to inform your honorable body that the assembly on this day adopted assembly concurrent assembly constitution amendment 20 Sue Parker, chief clerk of the assembly. Mr. President, I am directed to inform your Honorable Body that the Assembly amended and on this day passed as amended Senate Bill 417 and Senate Bill 623 and respectfully request your Honorable Body to concur and set amendments. Sue Parker, Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Messages from the Assembly will then be deemed read. Reports of committees will be deemed read and amendments adopted. Members, we are moving to motions, resolutions, and notices. Any member wish to be recognized under motions? Senator Hurtado, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. Under motions and resolutions, at the request of the author, please remove Assembly Bill 2262, File Item 166 from the consent calendar. The desk will note.
Senator Cortese, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. I request the withdrawal of file item 164, AB 739, on behalf of Assemblymember Jackson, and file item 175, AB 2078, on behalf of Assemblymember Rogers, for purposes of amendments. Thank you.
The desk will note. Thank you. Senator Laird, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. I move that measures reported by the Budget and Fiscal Review Committee on Monday, June 29, 2026, be given a second reading upon being reported and ordered to the third reading. Senator Nilo you are recognized You recognized with the mic on I will ahead Senator Nilo hang on one second Senator Nilo you are recognized again
You want to do it a third time? Usually that's the charge. If you think it'll help you.
Maybe I'll get more votes that way. As I said, I object to that motion and ask for a no vote.
Senator Laird is asking for an aye vote. Senator Nilo is asking for a no vote. Secretary, please call the roll. Allen. Avril Aguil. Archuleta. Aye. Aragon. Aye. Ashby. Aye. Becker. Blake Spear. Aye. Cobaldon. Aye. Caballero. Aye. Cervantes. Aye. Durazo, Gonzalez, aye. Grayson, aye. Grove, no. Hurtado, aye. Jones, Laird, aye. Limon, McGuire, aye. McNerney, aye. Menzabar, aye. Nilo, no. Ochoa Bo, no. Padilla, Perez, Trelles, Richardson, Aye. Rubio, Aye. Ciarto, No. Smallwood Cuevas, Stern, Strickland, No. Umberg, Aye. Valadares, No. Wahab, Aye. Weber Pearson, Aye. Wiener aye. Secretary please call absent members. Allen aye. Alvarado Gil, Becker aye. Daly, Durazo, Jones, Limon, Padilla, Perez, Reyes, Smallwood Cuevas, aye. Turazo, aye. Stern. Thank you. Senator Laird, you are recognized once again.
Thank you, Mr. President. First there's a letter at the desk requesting withdrawal of ACA 20 from the Committee on Rules. I move that ACA 20 be withdrawn from Committee, ordered to the floor, and that we take it
up without reference to file Is there any objection Seeing none the motion carries Senator Ashby you are recognized Thank you. Presiding officer, I move the adoption of authors and floor amendments that cross the
desk on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, June 26th, 7th, and 28th, as approved by leadership. Authors amendments will be adopted, published, and the bills returned to the committee. Floor amendments will be adopted, published, and ordered to second reading.
Senator Valadares, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. I rise to object and request that the previous roll call vote be applied. Thank you.
Any objection to previous roll call? It appears we'll have to call roll. With that, Secretary, please call roll. Allen. Aye. Aye. Alvarado Gil. Archuleta. Aye. Adegin. Aye. Aye, Ashby. Becker. Aye. Aye, Blake Spear. Aye. Cabaldon. Aye, Caballero. Aye. Aye, Cervantes. Aye. Aye, Choi. No, Cortese. Aye. Aye, Daly. Durazo. Aye, Gonzalez. Aye. Grayson. Aye. Grove. No, Hurtado. Aye. Jones. Laird. Aye. Aye. Limon. McGuire. Aye. Aye. McNerney. Aye. Menjabar. Aye. Nilo. Ochoa Bog. No. Padilla. Aye. Perez. Aye. Reyes. Richardson. Aye. Rubio. Aye. Ciarto. No. Smallwood Cuevas. Aye. Stern. Aye. Strickland. No. Umberg. Aye. Valadares. No. Wahab. Mojave, aye. Nilo, no. Ashby, aye. Ayes 28, noes 7. The motion carries. If there are no other members to be recognized under motions, resolutions, and notices, give us one moment as we prepare for our next step. Thank you. And Senator Laird, you are recognized. Secretary, please read. Assembly Constitutional Amendment 20 by Assemblymember Gabriel, an act relating to state finance. Senator Laird, you are recognized. Thank you very much, Mr. President. ACA 20 the Save for California Futures Act is a constitutional amendment that strengthens the state rainy day fund Prior to 2014 California consistently had not set aside significant amounts of reserves to smooth revenue volatility However the budget shortfalls of the Great Recession, which resulted in significant program cuts and painful impacts for so many Californians, led to a reconsideration of how to manage revenue volatility in our state. As a result of this difficult period, the current Rainy Day Fund was created by Proposition 2 of 2014 and specified a structure of mandatory deposits into the Rainy Day Fund as well as required debt repayments. Deposits into the account reached the 10% general fund revenue cap in four fiscal years. The Rainy Day Fund was first used to bridge the budget gap experienced in 2021 due to the pandemic. The Rainy Day Fund has been a successful improvement in statewide budgeting, leading to record reserves, which we have drawn upon in recent years as we have recovered from the pandemic. However, the ACA before us today reflects that it is time to continue to improve our rainy day fund, continuing the cycle of learning over time and making adjustments to ensure California's fiscal stability into the future. This ACA 20 mandates deposits into the rainy day fund until balance reaches 20% of general fund taxes, doubling the prior cap of 10%. It increases deposits into the rainy day fund to help fill that higher cap by depositing more funds during boom years when revenues spike. It adds common sense to how our key reserves are treated with the state appropriations limit, better known as the Gann Limit. Under this measure, funds count toward the limit when they are withdrawn from reserves and actually spent rather than when they are deposited into reserves. This very reform was supported by Paul Gann, the author of the Gann Limit. He thought it made much more sense to incentivize savings to not count the payments into the fund and to only count the withdrawals from the fund, which is what this ballot measure would do. This ballot measure also extends the requirement to make debt payments through 2040 and expands eligible debt to Proposition 98 Settle-Up, budget borrowing. And notably, this measure adds the federal unemployment insurance loan to the list of eligible debts that can be repaid. This adds a potential avenue for the state to assist employers in repaying the unemployment insurance debt. Establishing the Rainy Day Fund in 2014 was a monumental achievement that helped usher in the era of responsible budgeting. When I was chair of the Budget Committee from 2004 to 2008 in the Assembly, we had no reserves. We would have what we called the reserve that would be very small for that year for expenses that we anticipated. But if there was a recession, if there was a pandemic, we had nothing. This rainy day fund has changed that, and this is the time to fine-tune it. Establishing it managed the volatility without having to resort to draconian cuts and middle-class tax increases that were a perennial threat for the prior decade and a half. Today, we have the opportunity to ask the voters to take the next step and go even further in strengthening our rainy day fund and building a stronger, more fiscally stable California. Thank you for the years of work by the Assembly, the Senate, and the administration and their staff, and the continued focus on working toward constitutional amendment we're considering today. I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Senator. Senator Nilo, you are recognized. I'm sorry, Senator Sayarto. You've been called worse. It's a common error. I take no offense, especially since it's Senator Nilo. So senators, today I rise in lukewarm support, but opposition, but maybe somewhere in the middle because I think we are embarking on a path to do something that we have all supported and that is do something about our overall budget situation and part of that situation is our reserves right now we have 15 billion dollars in reserves that's not even the 10% 10% reserves right now be 25 billion dollars out of our general fund and we're not even close to that yet we should be putting money into reserves and when we have enough money in reserves and this is where I kind of start to to differ from from my colleagues on a strategy and approach and a goal when we are doing when we're going to present an ACA to our residents our goal needs to be establish a reserve but be able to have the flexibility to make substantial substantial progress on on our UI debt, on our borrowing debt. Our borrowing debt from other funds, I believe, is about $30 billion, and we're supposed to be paying interest on that into whatever fund that we are supposed to borrow from. So those debts just keep going up. The UI debt is another thing that we've all, you know, we've agreed for, we've been imploring us to get rid of the UI debt for years, especially when we had the funds to do it. But the UI debt now is still $19 billion, and the methodology that would be used to pay that off using the ACA 20 would essentially be the same as almost making your minimum payments on your credit card that you've ran up with $20,000 or $30,000. It'll be a long time before that gets paid off. So we need something with a little more certainty. We need something that clearly states the goal for our citizens when they're looking at a ballot measure that says, hey, this is what we want to do. We want to pay down our debt. We want to get rid of that UI debt. And we want to make sure that we have a reserve that is reflective of the budget that we have in California, the potential dangers that we have as far as emergencies and things like that that may come up. LAO has given us a number of 50%. I don't know that we're going to get to $125 billion of reserve anytime soon, but we certainly could get to 30, 40, or 50. And if we get to that 30, 40, or 50, our game plan should be to float our reserve between 15 and 20% and make substantial payments to pay off every single bit of the debt that we have accumulated so far. And I said so far because that a point in time debt In 2014 Governor Brown came up with this plan and he called it we need to get rid of the wall of debt At the time it was billion And the money that they would use would be used to pay off debt that had been accumulated so far but not debt going forward Well, this allows us to do debt going forward. And when we're doing debt going forward, and it may not be any of our goal, but other people are going to get elected to these seats, they may see that as an opportunity to borrow this year from another fund and then maybe pay it off with our reserve policy that we have the citizens go ahead and approve in the future years. In other words, we're just going to be churning water on the debt. We can't churn water. What we need to send the citizens is a bona fide plan to pay off debt, increase our reserves, which will increase our resiliency both financially and physically in our state, to be able to withstand an earthquake or a bridge falling down for other purposes. That way we can get those things done, and we don't have to borrow money and pay more interest. Our interest payments are somewhere north of a billion dollars a year just for this, but then when you add our bonded indebtedness, those payments are another $7 billion or so. We can't borrow our way out of this problem. We have to take positive action, and this could be part of it, But once we put an ACA to the citizens and it's not working the way we want, it's not reducing that debt, are we going to present another one in two more years to do another fix? We need to make sure this gets done right. There are a lot of concerns that myself and some of my colleagues may have had. We weren't able to express them until right now. And this isn't a criticism on the people that have been working hard to try to come up with a plan like this. But I'm concerned. I'm concerned that it creates some loopholes that other people will be able to, will be more than happy to march through. We're going to raise our debt ceiling a little bit, which means there's going to be more money in the pot to borrow from and pay back. And so that becomes another source of revenue when we don't really have revenue. So these are the things that are concerning us about this. I wish I had been able to be at the table when they were negotiating this, because then perhaps we could incorporate some of these additional things and we'd all be on the same page. I appreciate the efforts of my colleagues in trying to address this in a manner that all of us could be on board with. But at this time, it is difficult for me to be part of that train. Thank you. Senator Hurtado, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. I rise today as a proud co-author of ACA 20. I often say to people that I come across here at the Capitol that poverty does not discriminate in the Central Valley. And in the Central Valley, the people know that this is very much true of our region. But it's also very much true across California. But in the Central Valley and people across California know that there will be a time of hardship. And that when that time of hardship that hopefully it later rather than sooner that when that time comes we got to all be kind of prepared for it And our job here as legislators, as senators, is to protect Californians, to protect them from hardships, to protect them and provide them with opportunities. and I believe ACA 20 will do that. It will make us more disciplined, not just in saving, but also in spending. And this is important because finance is part of a critical infrastructure. It's a national security issue. It's the right thing to do. It's the right thing to protect Californians. It's the right investment. And for those reasons, I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Senator Strickland, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President, members. My opening comment is I want to say that I do believe the Assemblymember Gabriel gave a good faith effort into trying to resolve an issue that we've been talking about on this floor for quite some time. I do believe this ACA is a missed opportunity. There are some good things in this. I just wish the majority actually came to a lot of our members because we could have actually made this a very good proposal to the people of California had you included us on some of these provisions. But some of the good things in here is the UI debt, a list of obligations that's eligible for debt payments that we've been talking about on our side for quite some time. It increases the set aside for revenue spikes with higher capital gains. What I've mentioned in this year's budget is you're spending equal to record revenues with capital gains. And, you know, I actually do like the fact that you're going to try to put some of that money aside instead of increasing spending to match those record revenues. But unfortunately, the devil's in the details. This enables more irresponsible borrowing for any new budgetary debts. It does not require debt payment to go to the UI debt. And it facilitates more spending, exempting reserve deposits from the state spending limit. Members, this is missed opportunities to tighten our deposit and withdrawal rules. The best analogy, it's like getting a credit card in order to pay off your earlier spending credit card debt. And so what it does is it allows your addiction to spending to continue to move forward. Because what you're doing is just putting another credit card on an earlier credit card in order to keep your debt, in order to keep your spending going moving forward. And for those reasons, you know, again, I believe this is a missed opportunity. Because I think we could have worked together and got a great product to the people of California. there's many good things in here but there's more things that will not be good for the people of California particularly the addiction to spending of this legislature and so therefore I'm asking for no one to support ACA 20. Senator Valadares you are recognized. Thank you Mr. President. Members I rise because I cannot support ACA 20 I believe in fiscal responsibility and to me that means paying our debts building reserves and getting California fiscal house in order But ACA 20 essentially promises fiscal responsibility without requiring it California is carrying nearly a billion in federal unemployment insurance debt, and we are the only state in the nation that has still not repaid its COVID-era federal loan. Not one other state, just California. When California had a historic $98 billion budget surplus in 2022, we had the opportunity to pay down this debt. And instead, the legislature chose to spend that money elsewhere and handed the bill to California employers. And since then, employers have seen their federal UI payroll taxes increase by 250%. According to the California Business Roundtable, California employers now face a payroll tax burden nearly nine times higher than employers in states that paid off the debt years ago. Less than a month ago, I stood on this floor and asked this body to prioritize paying down the debt instead of shifting the burden onto employers already struggling with higher costs. It would have allocated $5 billion a year to pay the debt down in four years, and that proposal was rejected. So what does ACA 20 actually do? It authorizes payments towards the UI debt, but it doesn't require them. This is like having a maxed out credit card. Most people wouldn't keep building a bigger emergency fund while making minimum payments on their card. They'd pay off the debt first. ACA 20 doesn't require that. It allows reserves dollars to be used for future debt instead of the nearly $20 billion debt that we already owe. And that is not fiscal responsibility. That's kicking the can down the road. So we can still borrow to cover budget gaps, pay off the new borrowing first, and then leave UI debt sitting there year after year. Meanwhile, employers won't see the payroll tax relief until the UI debt is completely paid off. Even under the most optimistic projections right now, that would be nine years. And I can't look at the restaurant owners in my district, the contractors, the small manufacturers in Santa Clarita, the aerospace and defense industry in the Antelope Valley and in the Victor Valleys in the eye and tell them that this bill helps them. It doesn't. They're still paying for Sacramento's mistakes. And under this proposal, they'll continue paying for years, nearly a decade to come. ACA 20 gives the legislature a blank check for debt. Members, I urge that no one support this bill. Senator Nilo, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. yesterday in budget committee I compared this ACA 20 to kind of washing your hands with your gloves on it'll get the gloves clean but it won't really do the accomplished or the intended job like so many bills in the budget space there's There's some good and there's some bad. In this case, there is so little good and so much bad, it is just simply unsupportable given the status quo. My fellow Republican colleagues have articulated many of the issues with which we take exception. I think the only good thing one could say is that it doubles the reserve, doubles, from 10 to 20 percent when the LAO recommended a 50 percent cap. And that is woefully inadequate given the huge fluctuations that we have in our revenue base. Our colleague from Pico Rivera yesterday talked about explaining these things to constituents. That's the other fundamental problem with this proposal, which we just seem to always do, particularly with regard to reserve proposals. It was true of Proposition 2 also. It is incredibly complicated. I would challenge anybody in this room to have a town hall with your constituents and you explain this constitutional amendment to them. I think it would be very difficult for anybody to do that. I do like the KISS principle. there is a simplistic way to forever cure the dysfunction that exists because of our incredibly fluctuating revenue sources. Now we could change the tax system. We know that's not going to happen, but we can change how we can utilize those revenues with just a simple rolling average of revenues over a five to seven year period. That because it's pretty much the time during which we go from feast to famine and back to feast and famine again. And whenever revenues are above that rolling average, all of that difference goes into a reserve. And when it drops below that rolling average, those reserves can come back in. Gives much more flexibility to budget riders. very easy to explain, and completely solves the fundamental dysfunction that gets us into budget trouble in the first place, and that is the highly fluctuating revenue source that we have. So I preach simplicity, which we do not have. I preach much more positive impacts than negative impacts, which we do not have. I urge a no vote. Senator Grove, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. I, too, rise in opposition of ACA 20. I think we deal, and only Elon Musk and all of us and maybe Congress, deals in billions and billions and billions and hundreds of millions of dollars. everyday Californians that sit at their kitchen table are taking their five to seven thousand or three to four thousand dollar two to three thousand dollar budget and they like okay I have to pay my house payment my rent my car payment my utilities and what left over if I don have them enough I have to figure out how to either cut what I using now or I have to borrow or get a credit card and extend things on a credit card. So it's really hard to explain to Californians, and I'm not saying they're ignorant. They are not in any way, shape, or form, but it's just hard for someone that's, you know, working two jobs or a single mom or even business owners that are small business owners to comprehend that California's debt is a total, California's debt not in total, but $72 billion is on general obligation bonds. Lease bonds are about $9.73 billion. The state debt is $112 billion according to today's numbers and estimates. But that varies because there are additional numbers out there that say that it's $223 billion, $34 billion in borrowing, $19 billion in UI debt, and there's unfunded pension liability for $170 billion. So the numbers are so vast. The LAO's office, which is the legislative analyst office, says that our debt and our obligations are here, and then there's new numbers, and the governor and the legislative members of the legislature say the numbers are here. So it's difficult to even have a conversation when you don't even know what your actual debt is. I can tell you that people that are our constituents that are worried about the cost of inflation and the cost of the cost and increase of the borrowing that we have is a way it's weighing on their hearts and it's weighing on their families. The debt interest alone on what is going on for this fiscal year is $668 million. So think about a family of four, two parents raising two kids, and they have to comprehend that the state of California's debt service alone this year is $668 million. Million dollars. Now, this does include information in this bill that allows UI debt to be included in the debt repayment that is going to be calculated into this reserve for debt payment. It doesn't say it's going to be used to reduce the UI payment or the unemployment insurance payment, which is the food of tax reduction credit. When we overdraw our unemployment funds as a state of California through fraudulent payments or just overpaying those that are on unemployment extended benefits and things like that, it falls back on the employers, which creates an additional tax. That tax this cycle that is extended out until 2036 is going to cost employers roughly $20 billion. That's just an additional tax on top of every other tax and every regulatory fee that employers, small and large businesses, pay in this state. I appreciate the fact that it is used in this as a UI payment that it could possibly be used in future budgets to be able to use those dollars to pay that debt down. I've been here since 2010 when it was overdrawn in the first place, and it was, I believe, $32 billion. It took 12 years to pay it off, and the people in this building didn't do anything but provide the debt service. The principal all had to be paid off by employers in this state. And I don't see that attitude changing, which is the hostile environment that employers operate here in the state of California and the people on this floor. I don see you automatically picking up some type of UI debt that been overpaid to the federal government unless you forced to by the federal government I think there are like my colleague said some good things about this The UI issue is one of them Putting reserves in place so that we have kind of a savings account to draw from That hasn't worked in the past. I don't see it working in the future, but I'm optimally optimistic about your goals, the lofty goals. I can tell you with the debt service that is available on this new type of borrowing that stings it out for another 10 years instead of 2031, I believe it goes to 2041 for another decade, the debt service on this for Californians is going to be drastically expensive. Again, there are a few things in here that are good, but overall it's just increasing the cost for every Californian. I think it's roughly almost $3,000. It's $2,890-something per person in the state of California, and that number will do nothing but increase with the additional debt borrowing that we'll do. It's like we're, again, we don't have a solid number, $34 billion in budgetary, $223 billion is what we're looking for for the repayment for debt, based on the analysis. $223 billion, including budgetary borrowing. So we have a $34 billion budgetary borrowing. We're getting a credit card for a $19 billion UI debt repayment. Then we're getting a loan from the bank to pay the credit card and the interest on the credit card for another $170 billion in the retiree debt that we have. We're in a bad financial situation, and we're doing a shell game. It's a pretty good shell game. I don't think anybody but possibly maybe my colleague from Santa Cruz can explain this to the voters and explain this to all of us. But the bottom line is that we have to look at the debt service. And the only reason I spoke a lot about debt service and interest paying back debt, $668 million is not a small price tag for the debt that we owe in the state of California. I'm married to a North Dakota cowboy who pays cash for everything, and if you can't pay cash for it, you don't finance it, you don't buy it. He is into savings, making sure that you have six months of this, and he will go without instead of having something that comes out of the savings account. He's been like that all of his life. He's kind of hard-headed in that way. He's the saver. I'm the spender. And I just applaud him because he has been very fiscally sound in our financial situation at home. And I think that every household that is struggling with bills and struggling with house payments and rent, like I started with insurance, with the cost of living, with additional taxes, with higher cost of food, higher cost of fuel, these taxes that we're imposing on the state of California for an additional almost $3,000 is just not realistic. I do applaud the effort. I wish it was structured in a different way so we could minimize our structural debt and our debt payments, but that wasn't what was agreed upon between the three-party deal, the governor, the speaker, and the pro tem, and I wish we could address this in a way that would bring our house and our state into fiscal responsibility, and I respectfully ask for a no vote.
Senator Cabaldon, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. We've heard a lot of metaphors this morning. Credit cards, hand washing, gloves, bank loans. But let's check them out a little bit, because some of them have had a little bit of Austin Powers to them. Oh, my God, $680 million. Million dollars, 683. Well how much is billion It million Our state budget is over billion So billion is worth less than relative to the income of a middle family in this state. We're not overburdened with debt in California. What we do have a problem with, though, is our reserves. So forget the metaphors for a second. Let's listen to folks who actually specialize in this, the folks that rate our credit for purposes of bonds. Moody's and the other nonpartisan independent multinational ratings companies that say this government has a good credit rating this one is a bad one. What have they said about California? They said California's credit rating is pretty decent. You know how it would be better? You know how it would be better if California had a much larger reserve. If California had a better reserve, we could up the credit rating for the state to be even better than it is today. Why does that matter? Because that means that $687 million goes down. The way we save money for taxpayers in this state, the way we save money in our budget, is to have a better credit rating, and the way forward to a better credit rating is to have a decent amount of reserves. Now, my colleague from Fair Oaks is perhaps under something here, which is that we should even have a bigger reserve. Maybe 50%. I'm not sure I'd go that far, but maybe. Maybe. But there's no other proposal on the table today. The only proposal is to take what he called a modest effort, but it's doubling the size of the state's reserve capacity. That will go a long way to making sure we don't have to make devastating cuts when we're at the bottom of our budget, that we're now having to contemplate even when we have money coming in, and it will reduce the cost of our ongoing borrowing. So this is a critical bill to move forward, and it's critical that we move it to the voters right now because there's never been a more important revenue moment that we do not have the ability to deal with. We have at least three major California-based companies, or with lots of California workers there, that are likely to generate enormous tax revenues in the coming years. One-time revenues. Exactly the kind of revenues that a substantial portion should be going into general fund reserves in order to protect us over the long term. If we sit around in an ivory tower and debate what these policies could look like and maybe put something on the ballot two years from now or four years from now, we will have missed the most important opportunity in California's history to get this right. This is a well-crafted consensus among every finance expert in California. This is the way forward. I urge an aye vote. Seeing no further discussion or debate, Senator Laird, would you like to close? Thank you very much, Mr. President. It was said during this debate that the big thing we should do is get our fiscal house in order. will pay attention to the budget that we approved a week ago Monday. That budget balanced the budget for two years. It cut the structural reserve, structural deficit in half. But more importantly, it set aside over $36 billion in reserves. $36 billion more than we had before the Rainy Day Fund. But the significant thing is, is we had to do a substantial amount of that voluntarily because this measure was not in place. In fact, in getting our fiscal house in order, we were taking seven and a half billion dollars. of excess revenue in the current fiscal year due to the artificial intelligence revenue that's coming in and holding it for the year after next to match with cutting the structural deficit in half and balancing the budget. If this measure were in place, we wouldn't have had to do those extra efforts. We would have been doing them anyway. And it's interesting because it was said during our debate yesterday, and it was actually reaffirmed during this debate, that if we were really going to deal with volatility in the revenue system, we would have to give the wealthiest people in California a tax cut and raise the taxes on the middle class. We will not do that. So what is the alternative? The alternative is saving more. And when it was said that what about a person working two jobs, what would they say? They would say save more. They would say do exactly what this ballot measure does. And I appreciate the previous comments because this was done. The Rainy Day Fund was established in 2014. We are getting to doubling the amount in 2026. These opportunities don't come along. I mentioned in the opening statement that Paul Gann, who was the architect of the Gann limit, he endorsed the fact that we should pay more and not have that account and only in the Gann limit count the withdrawals. He has been gone for 37 years. He proposed that before that. We are doing it now. These opportunities do not present themselves regularly. We have one. And it was said in the debate that there are many fine things in this ballot measure, which is why we should approve it. We have a unique opportunity to double the amount that we save, and it won't present itself if we don't take it for years and years. This is our chance to address the volatility that everybody complains about. This is our chance to have it in statute and the Constitution in a way that we will absolutely save and we will absolutely continue the process that we are embarked on of uprighting the state budget. I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Secretary, please call roll. Allen. Aye. Alvarado Gil. Archuleta. Aye. Aragín. Aye. Ashby. Aye. Becker. Aye. Blake Spear. Aye. Cabaldon. Caballero. Cervantes. Choi. Cortese. Daly. Durazo. Gonzalez. Grayson. Grove. Hurtado. Jones. Laird. Limon. McGuire. McNerney. Menjabar. Durazo, aye. Gonzalez, aye. Menjabar, aye. Nilo, Ochoa Vogue, Padilla, aye. Perez, aye. Reyes, Richardson, aye. Rubio, aye. Ciarto, Smallwood Cuevas, aye. Stern, aye. Strickland, Humbert, aye. I follow Darius Wahab Aye Weber Pearson Aye Wiener Aye Secretary please call absent members Alvarado Gil Daly Grove No Jones? Limon? Aye. Nilo? Ochoa Boat? Reyes? Ciaro? Strickland? Valadares? Secretary, please call absent members once again. Alvarado Gil, Daly, Jones, Nilo, Ochoa Bogues, Reyes, Ciaro, Strickland, Valadares. Ayes 29, Nose 2. The measure passes. Members, we are moving to Supplemental File Number 1, Item Number 186, SB 417. Senator Lamone, you are... We are moving to item 187, SB number 623. Senator Umberg, you are recognized. Or Secretary, please read. Senate Bill 623 by Senator Umberg, an act relating to transportation. Senator Umberg, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. Colleagues, you may have heard that Uber, the rideshare entities, as well as the other stakeholders have come to a compromise with respect to the proposed ballot issues. I don't want to say this is biblical, but let me quote Isaiah 1116. The lion lay down with the lamb. Except those of you who are biblical scholars like my colleagues from the Inland Empire and Pastor Grayson will note that's not actually the quote from Isaiah 1116. The actual quote is, the wolf will lie down with the lamb and the leopard will lie down with the goat. I'm not sure who the lambs and the goats are in this compromise, but I am very grateful, and we should all be grateful, that they have reached a compromise that is fair to Californians. It creates a system that's safe, fair, accountable by protecting patients from unnecessary treatment and overcharging, ensuring access to medical care and legal representation, and strengthening the rideshare safety measures. In order to address concerns in the medical lien industry and their relationship to attorneys while ensuring that victims get access to care, SB 623 makes several reforms in transportation network company accident cases. For accidents occurring on or after January 1, 2027, if a plaintiff receives treatment from a lien-based medical provider, the plaintiff generally cannot recover more than the 70th percentile as shown in the Fair Health database for that particular service in that geographic area. Charges above that amount cannot be collected from the plaintiff in our void. It requires standardized itemization of all lien-based medical bills. If a lien care provider sells their lien to a third party the maximum amount the third party can recover is the consideration paid by that third party to the lien provider for the assignment It makes it unlawful for an attorney representing a person under a contingency fee agreement to refer the client to a health care provider in which the attorney or a family member of the attorney has a direct ownership interest It makes it unlawful for an attorney to receive a kickback or a fee split for referring a client to a lien-based provider or provide bonuses or incentives for referring a client to a lien-based provider. prohibits attorneys from charging an additional contingency fee, administrative fee, management fee, or similar fee based on reducing or resolving a client's medical lien. Additionally, SB 623 makes several reforms to the TNC, ride share industry, in order to protect passengers and create greater accountability. It requires an initial background check before activating a ride share driver, and annual background checks thereafter, adds additional issues, crimes like violating a restraining order and child abuse to the list of crimes that disqualifies a potential driver and expressly allows women drivers to request women passengers only and women passengers to request women drivers only. Kudos to the stakeholders that hashed this out over the last several months. It avoids a costly battle, and I think that the compromise creates a workable alternative that protects Californians and ensures that those who are injured can receive just compensation, and at the same time, it keeps passengers safe. And for that, I ask an aye vote. Seeing no further discussion or debate, Secretary, please call roll. Allen. Aye. Alvarado Gil. Archuleta. Aye. Arrigan. Aye. Ashby. Becker. Aye. Blakespeare. Aye. Cabaldon. Caballero. Aye. Cervantes. Choi. Aye. Cortese. Aye. Daly. Durazo. Aye. Gonzalez. Aye. Grayson. Aye. Grove. Hurtado. Aye. Jones, Laird, Aye, Limon, McGuire, Aye, McNerney, Aye, Menjivar, Nilo, Aye, Ochoa Bog, Aye, Padilla, Aye, Perez, Aye, Reyes, Richardson, Rubio, Aye, Cioto, Aye, Smallwood Cuevas, Aye, Stern, Aye, Strickland, Aye, Umberg, Aye, Voladeros, Aye, Wahab, Aye, Weber Pearsons aye. Weiner aye. Secretary please call absent members. Alvarado Gill, Ashby, Cobaldon, Cervantes aye. Daly, Grove aye. Jones, Limon, Mandivar, Reyes, Richardson. Richardson aye. Thank you. Thank you Secretary, please call absent members. Avarado Gil, Ashby, Aye. Cabaldon, Aye. Daly, Jones, Limon, Aye. Menjivar, Aye. Reyes, Ayes 36, Noes 0. The measure passes. Members, give us one moment. Thank you. Members, we are moving back to item 186, SB 417. Senator Lamone, or Secretary, please read. Senate Bill 417 by Senator Lamone, an act relating to housing by providing the funds necessary therefore through an election for the issuance and sale of the bonds of the state of California and for the handling and disposition of those funds and declaring the urgency thereof to take effect immediately. Senator Lamone, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. SB 417, the Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2026, is a critical measure to place on the ballot for an $11.25 billion housing bond that addresses full spectrum of the needs for housing here in our state. The policy builds on the work of so many to ensure that our most vulnerable keep the roof over their heads while connecting families and first-time homebuyers to the need for home ownership opportunities. The bond complements the significant progress the state has made over the last several years in addressing our housing crisis. For the first time in 15 years, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has reported that unsheltered homelessness dropped about 9% across this state. But we're not done. We will continue to do more work to ensure that the legislature prioritizes housing funds for special need populations, including people experiencing homelessness, farm workers and their families, public universities, City students, tribal members, young adults, and our veterans. We approach this with not a one and done. Through my time in the legislature, we have voted on a number of bills to streamline housing production in our state. Today, we have in front of us a way to fund some of that. We know that it's important to tackle this priority for our legislature, for our state, year by year. In the last five years, California has made incredible progress by doubling the number of new affordable homes, and this bond helps us keep that momentum going for the foreseeable future. I am proud today that this body brings forth a measure that will have lasting impacts on creating housings for millions of Californians in this state. I want to thank an incredible group of members who have been involved and who have helped get us here today. From the Bay Area to West Sacramento to Los Angeles, from all parts of this state, there have been incredible folks who have helped lift this to the finish line. I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Pro Tem. Senator Grove, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. with the deepest respect to the author and our pro tem, I have some huge issues with the way this bond is being presented. The title of this bond is the Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond. This bond total is $11.25 billion, with a B, with $10 billion in general obligation bonds and $1.25 billion in revenue bonds for veterans. Why? Because maybe the people of the state of California wouldn't approve $10 billion in general obligation bonds, creating additional debt, without something in there. So I submit to all of you, this is not a veterans' housing bond. It's a veterans' bait bond. I say that because this title of this bond is going to say that they're supporting veterans housing, where we in the state of California have 19,000 homeless veterans estimated, 3,000 in Los Angeles alone. And those 19,000 unhoused veterans, that's the highest in the entire nation for any state. But to say you're going to allow it to be a veterans bond when it uses $10 billion of those dollars for other than veteran services and leaves those that defend this country on the street is completely not true. You cannot say that it's a veterans bond and it uses just at 11% or 89% of this bond money goes to other sources of funding for other individuals. We've already spent $24 billion on homeless housing in the state of California, and there are other reports, contrary to what the Senate pro tem said, was that the housing and outside homelessness or unsheltered homeless has increased in this state. And only some point-in-time counts have gone down. This like I said calling this a veterans bond is almost offensive throwing crumbs on the table for our United States military veterans with like I said 89 of this money being approved to create more debt is going to fund more homeless and housing operations that have been riddled with fraud waste and abuse and have not actually met the people on the street and provided them housing If you take the 182,000 people that are supposed to be unhoused and homeless in the state of California, that 182,000 people with the $24 billion that has been spent, we could have bought every one of them a brand new home. It's been riddled with, I said, waste, fraud, and abuse. And I'm offended. I'm going to support it because I think that 1.2 billion is better than no billion that goes to veterans. but it's a sad thing to say that you have to use the veterans as a bait to get the people of the state of California to approve an $11 billion bond. And I just think that's shameful. Call it what it is. It's a homeless bond, and it does include some veterans' benefits, but it is not a veterans' bond. If this was a veterans' bond, we would make sure that the 19,000 U.S. military veterans that have defended this country would be off the street, and we would use those dollars for it.
Senator Aragon, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. I stand in strong support of SB 417, and I want to thank our pro tem, Senator Lamone, Speaker Rivas, Assemblyman Wicks, and most specifically Senator Cobalt, the senator from West Sacramento, Senator Cobaltin, for their hard work and leadership in getting this bond to us today. this is historic and transformative, and this is a veterans housing bond. I have deep respect to my colleague, the Senator from Bakersfield, and appreciate her comments and her service to our country. $1.25 billion of this bond measure will provide home loan assistance to veterans to purchase homes in California. I think about the unhoused veterans on the streets in my district, in Oakland and Berkeley who've served our country but who've been left behind and who are struggling to find housing stability in a path forward. And this bond measure will provide an opportunity for people to own homes who are veterans in California. I want to commend the senator from Pico Rivera for his leadership as the chair of the Military and Veterans Affairs Committee in helping advance this effort, which is going to transform the lives of veterans throughout the state of California. But this is also transformative in that it is funding for the first time several things that are critical in our state. So much of what we've done in California has focused on building new housing and not on preserving existing homes that are at risk of conversion or displacement. So we can help stabilize communities and keep people stably housed and reduce homelessness. This bond focuses on the three Ps, the production, preservation, and protection of Californians. And I want to just lift up $200 million of this bond measure. We'll fund for the first time a program to help acquire and preserve existing, naturally occurring affordable housing in the state of California. I want to thank the Center for Merced for her leadership in advancing this proposal. Additionally, $150 million in this bond measure will help provide housing for transition-age youth, and youth that have aged out of our foster care system, and young people who are experiencing homelessness to have stable housing. And I want to commend the Senator from the San Fernando Valley for her leadership in advancing this critical effort as well So in this bond we not only providing funding to create 45 shovel homes in California all over the state of California. These are housing projects that have been approved, that need this money to be able to get these projects built and to be able to open the doors to provide housing for people. Money to help transition-age youth and foster youth. Money to help preserve existing housing. Money to help address the needs of our unhoused community by providing permanent supportive housing. Funding for homeownership so we can expand homeownership opportunities in California because rental housing is not the only way for us to address housing stability in California. And money for infill infrastructure to help support new sustainable communities in California, not just building the housing but providing the connected infrastructure. and lastly funding to help support our veterans to make sure that they have homes honoring the service they provide our country. This is historic. This will be transformative for the lives of thousands and thousands of Californians. I'm honored to support this today and to have worked with the leaders to help move this forward. I respectfully and strongly ask for an aye vote and SB 417. Senator Minch of our year of recognition. Thank you Mr. President. Three years ago I started my effort to pass a youth housing bond and it wasn't because at the time I was the youngest senator closest to the age of all the youth that I was trying to fight for it was because at the age of 19 I had to look my mom in the eye when the bank came and evicted us out of our home after she worked so hard to buy that at the age of 19 my sister my mom moved in with my aunt a little ways away from where we lived and I couch served for over a year because I was a college student at that time and it was really hard for me to go move into a one bit you know into a spare bedroom with my mom and my sister at the time I thought it was really fun I was sleeping on different couches I was hanging out with my friends these were sleepovers but it was really difficult to navigate that life while going to college and one of the main reasons well one of the reasons I joined the Marine Corps I was like well that's stable housing and it wasn't until I joined the Marine Corps that I got stable housing since I became housing unstable flash forward 20 years later, we across the nation have the highest number of unhoused youth. And we should be ashamed of that. Of the number of youth who are unhoused, 60% are unsheltered. So while I would have been considered housing unstable youth, I had a couch to sleep on or a bed of my friends to sleep on while going to college. But a lot of youth are sleeping in their cars right now while going to college. They're going to the gyms. They're going to the basic centers of the community colleges and colleges to get the needs while trying to be successful, taking showers where they can find it, because they don't want that story to be the reason why they're not successful. And currently right now, only 2.9% of the available beds are for youth specifically. And what happens when we don't support them? Well, let me tell you what happens. The older people you're seeing on the streets uh the individuals that during the rainy day you're like why is a grandma why is a grandpa sleeping under a facade with a blanket and a cart next to them well it's because 50 percent of them first experienced homelessness when they were under the age of 25 and it turned into chronic homelessness because we didn't step in in the beginning and stop it before it became more expensive to help them when now they have diabetes now they have um edema and And their lower extremities are swollen and it's really hard to care for them. Enter this housing bill that after three years of fighting for it we were able with the leadership collaboration with the Senator from West Sacramento Yolo County and the Pro Tem add million for youth housing Those who are at risk of homelessness who are unhoused who are foster kids and are current foster kids We're going to be able to address the situation at the beginning of the problem to prevent them from having chronic homelessness. That's why I'm so proud to support SB 417, to help the individuals that we often forget that are also unhoused. Respectfully asking for an I-VIL. Senator Smallwood-Cuevas, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President, and I appreciate this discussion, and I want to thank everyone that was involved in our leadership and our members and in the other house to make this housing bond possible. And I hear my colleagues from the other aisle and their concerns about veteran homelessness. I don't agree with their position on this bill, but I do agree about the crisis, and I do agree about the fact that it's compounded, and I do agree that it's going to take much more than this housing bond to address the levels of homelessness for our veteran populations, for our working families, for our youth, and certainly for black Angelenos and black Californians. I rise in support of SB 417, in particular for black Californians, who represent only 7% of the state, but 50% of those who sleep on the streets in my district. Black Californians represent approximately 26% of the state's total unhoused population, and we also know that they have about 36%, only 36% of California's home ownership population. The gap represents families who have been denied one of the most powerful tools of building wealth, stability, and opportunity across generations. And that's what we see when we think about the disparities that this community faces, whether it's health disparities, access to quality food disparities, access to open space, access to quality jobs. It all ends up with what kind of wealth are these families able to create. And we know homeownership is the only real true way for working families to achieve wealth in this country and in this state. And this is why I support SB 417. This bill tackles the state's housing crisis through a comprehensive approach that expands homeownership opportunities for first-time homebuyers and for working families. It also helps with home repair assistance, which we know many of our seniors need. This is an opportunity for multi-generations to benefit from equity and opportunity. This bond also supports Californians recovering from the devastating Los Angeles wildfires, and we know so many of those stories, those families who are continuing to rebuild, who want to save their neighborhoods, who want to keep their families' treasure of having an intergenerational wealth tool to pass on to the next generation. SB 417 helps ensure that recovery is not just about restoring what's lost, but creating a stronger foundation for the future. The persistent home ownership gap we know is more than a statistic. It reflects longstanding barriers to economic mobility, and it reminds us that expanding access to affordable home ownership must remain a priority in a state. We cannot look at California as we are becoming a people of color majority, as we are seeing our young community step into the most technological age of information. advancement and yet they cannot achieve home ownership. We know that this is a trend that we must correct. This bond is a step, an investment in doing that and moving us in the right direction and with that I respectfully ask for an aye
vote. Senator Strickland you are recognized. Thank you Mr. President
members, I rise in opposition to SB 417. As a son of a crew military soldier, I also have some of the concerns that my colleague from Bakersfield, Kern County has, that this is a veteran bait-and-switch bond. Using veterans to pass your $10 billion general obligation bond, when the general obligation is 90% of this and only 10% goes to the veterans, it really just says that you're using veterans to pass their $10 billion general obligation bond. I would remind everybody here, let's talk about the veterans for a second. The veterans already have a VA loan program that's out there and available to them to get in their homes. The problem is only 13% of the 20 million people are actually utilizing this benefit. So it would be better for us to actually inform the veterans, and they already have a program out there, a federal program, to help them get that home. So instead of this bond that you're using the veterans for, let's use those resources to let them know that there's a bond program out there already, a VA program out there for the home buying that's only being 13% utilized. That's number one. Number two, when we talk about housing, I do agree with some of my colleagues on the other side. It's very important for hardworking families to be able to get into that housing. But there's a better way to do it. In fact, there's already an initiative that's qualified that's going to the ballot today that is for middle class and hardworking families to get that home that they want and that we push that we want homeownership across the state of California. The difference is the one that's already qualified for the ballot uses private revenue bonds. So it's a better way of doing it because now we're not creating a structural deficit here in the state of California. and we already know the revenue is not going to continue. We're going to have a budget of revenues and a structural deficit moving forward. We're borrowing more money at a time, by the way, I'll say. Record revenues that we had, record revenues. Then we raised taxes by $14 billion, and now you're borrowing money against the future on this bond. There's a better way to do it, and there's already an initiative on the ballot that has private revenue bonds that will do exactly what you guys are trying to do that's already there. But the difference is you want the government to pay for it instead of the private revenue bonds. For whatever reason, I don't understand why you're moving forward on this bill because there's already a good initiative out there to accomplish your goal. The veterans already have an ability through the VA program that's only being 13% utilized. So there's really no reason for SB 417 other than to put hardworking families and the California taxpayers more in debt moving forward in perpetuity.
And for those reasons, I ask for a no vote on SB 417.
Senator Archuleta, you are recognized. Gentlemen, if I can have you, Jerry. Thank you, Mr. President. I rise as the chair of the Military and Veterans Committee. And, yes, the Veterans Housing Bond Act. Veterans lead the way. Our military lead the way. It is appropriate that the veterans are standing up for the state of California. It appropriate that CalVet stands up for our veterans here in California This loan program that incorporated it is a great program because it is a 5 down to veterans They can partner together. They can go ahead and bring their families in. My colleague from Orange County mentioned VA. As a real estate broker all my life, that is my trade, the VA loan is not as liberal and as easygoing as the CalVet program because of the restrictions. And I've sold the VA and I've sold CalVet, and it's easier for our CalVet program for our veterans to qualify. And even now that we have so many who need housing, they're able to get, as we heard, the secondary market, which means the market of your hometown, where the homes are 20, 30, and 40 years old. They can buy in there. They can also buy in condominiums and tracts, and these condominiums and these townhomes are there for them. But what is important about this bill is the fact that it opens so many doors for the veterans that have already served, and those that are overseas right now when they come home. My own son just completed his military service. He got home last week, and he will be looking into the CalVet program, which allows him 5% down, which allows him and every veteran to have that payment include his insurance, his fire insurance. God forbid that if that home were to burn down, it would be replaced 100% by CalVet. So it's important to understand it's reasonable, it's obtainable, and the CalVet program with so many things that are there, It's great for veterans. So I'm so honored to say that on behalf of the veterans and everyone I've spoke of, they're supporting Senate Bill 417. And I hope you do the same because it is important. It is history in California to say, welcome home to our veterans. We've got the 4th of July around the corner. We're going to be waving the flag. Well, let's stand up for our veterans and say this Senate Bill 417 was the right thing to do for all of us. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I mean, Mr. President.
Thank you. Senator Wiener, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. I rise in strong support of SB 417. I want to thank the senator from West Sacramento and the pro tem, some member WICs, everyone who made this possible. It took years of hard work, and I'm very grateful for the perseverance. I also want to put this in the context of the broader housing work that happens in the Senate and the Assembly and in this Capitol, because this is not just a random let's do a bond. This is part of a broader constellation of housing work to try to help California dig out of the massive hole that this state, that we have dug for ourselves as a state where we have a massive shortage of housing at all income levels, including for low-income Californians. And over the last decade, we have passed bill after bill after bill around zoning, around permitting, around impact fees, around CEQA, around so many different obstacles to building the housing that we so desperately need. And that work is incredibly important and is having positive impacts in California as we speak. but the funding has not kept up and so we right now in California have about 45 affordable homes below market rate homes in our state that are fully permitted that are ready to go often have partial funding but need that additional funding to complete the financing so that they can start construction they are ready to go, and this bond will get that going. And some have said, oh, wow, 45,000 homes that are permitted and aren't getting built, and they look at it as a negative. No, it's not a negative. We didn't have that problem in the past because the housing wasn't even getting permitted or it wasn't zoned for, and so we didn't have a problem of a backlog in terms of funding needs. It's a good problem to have that the housing is ready to go a huge amount of it and growing because of the work that we've done in this body. And now it's time to step up and make sure that the funding is there. This bond is a huge step in that direction. It is really exciting. Again, my gratitude to everyone who got us here.
And I ask for an aye vote.
Senator Caballero, you're recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. I rise as a proud co-author in support of SB 417.
And I also would like to thank the leadership and the members who work so tirelessly on this bond. It has taken years to get us to this point. And it reflects the diverse funding needs that we have in this state in order to address California's housing deficit. And the reason that we need the resources is what works in the valley is not the same need as the coast. And Northern California has a different need than Southern California. So the bond really reflects the reality that to solve California's housing crisis, a broad portfolio of investments is required, from veterans housing to down payment assistant to student housing, infrastructure, tribal assistant, farm worker housing, new construction, home ownership opportunities, and money to preserve affordable housing that currently exists in our state. And I'm especially grateful that the bond includes $200 million to establish the Community Anti-Displacement and Preservation Program created by SB 1091. Too often we focus on building new housing, which is critically important and undeniably necessary, but we can't afford to lose the affordable housing we already have. In my district, we have a significant number of units that are affordable today at risk of being purchased, remodeled, and increased in price, driving families that live in these homes, people, real people who live in these homes, many seniors out of the neighborhood because they can't afford to pay the new higher rents. And so today we have nearly 1.1 million naturally occurring affordable housing units that provide housing to low and moderate income individuals. And almost half of those homes are at risk of becoming market rate conversions through private acquisitions. Once these affordable housing units are lost, they are incredibly difficult to replace and very expensive. Preservation of affordable housing is a proven and cost-effective tool to prevent displacement, to keep families in their communities, and to create deed-restricted affordable housing without having to wait years for those units to be built And so this bond becomes critically important in helping all of us to meet the housing needs that we have in our communities and I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Senator Laird, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. The senator from San Francisco beat me to one of my two points, but it was said there was no reason for this bond in the debate, there's over 45,000 reasons for this bond, which is those are the number of units that are ready to go, that are penciled out, that this bond will move to construction. That is a substantial effort in our desire to create more housing. The other point I wanted to make is that when this bond came out of the Senate earlier this year, I stood up on the floor and made the point that unless there was money for infrastructure for challenged communities, they could not avail themselves of this bond. There are disadvantaged communities across the state that do not have the money for water, that do not have the money for additional sewer capacity, and their units depend on their ability to do that. If they do not have support for that, then this bond would be about support to just wealthy communities. Well, there is a nice amount in this bond to help those disadvantaged communities, and that will unleash housing. I know there's one in the Salinas Valley where they have a 200-unit facility ready to go, and with the waterboard restrictions, they can't move on it. They will have the chance to have a grant from this bond. They will have a chance for multifamily help from this bond. And that is why the people of California are anxiously waiting for us to approve it here on the floor and get it to the voters where they can approve it and housing can be constructed. I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Senator Rubio, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. Today I rise strongly in support of SB 417. Every one of us here on this law recognizes the crisis that we find ourselves in. We hear constantly from families that are struggling, from parents working two to three jobs to make ends meet, from young individuals also sharing with us and wondering if they're ever going to own a home. But I would say even more importantly from our youth who today are wondering where they're going to sleep. We hear from seniors who no longer are able to afford the homes, the communities that they helped build for us, generations before us. And we also hear from unhoused veterans who know and we recognize they fought so hard for us, and it is unacceptable that they are on the street or struggling to find a warm bed. It is important that we recognize once again that this measure alone is not going to solve the crisis. And I don't think any of us on this floor believes that. But I do believe that today we're taking an important step towards real solutions. This bond represents real collaboration between the legislature, housing advocates, or local governments, community partners who came together because we all understand the urgency of this moment. For communities throughout the San Gero Valley, my district, it means opportunity. It means affordable housing. It's in the horizon. It helps veterans. It helps support first-time buyers. It builds homes for working families who just simply do not have a chance in today's not only unaffordability crisis, but just with everything that's coming at them. This represents hope. I want to thank our president and pro tem Monique Limon for bringing us all together around this shared goal. Progress doesn't happen all at once. It happens when we continue to move forward in a meaningful direction with collaboration, respect, and understanding of this moment. While our work is far from over, this is an investment that gives hope to our families who have waited far too long for us to step in and help. With that, I strongly urge an aye vote. Thank you, Mr. President. Senator Cabaldon, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. In hundreds of communities across the state, in every single Senate district, right now there are council members, there are housing advocates, There are nonprofit housing builders all trying to build a project in their community. For some of them, it's because they realize and recognize how important housing for their entire community is, for their workforce, to keep their schools from closing, from declining enrollment. For some of them, they're just trying to meet their regional housing needs allocation obligations. For some of them, some of the legislation that my colleague from San Francisco mentioned is putting a little pressure to build this housing. And in town after town, small groups of engaged citizens and business leaders and government officials are just trying to figure out how to make housing real. And they have done everything that we asked them to do, everything that their community has asked them to do. They have acquired the land. They've done the rezoning. They've figured out the financing package. They've figured everything else out, and they have 85 percent of the money that they need to build that townhome project, that apartment project. All they need is the last bit of money to get it across the line. When we say 45,000 units, it's because community after community after community from Yucaipa to Dixon to Encinitas, everyone is pulling in this direction across the state of California, and we've been a big part of that. But now they're asking us, we need to build it now. That's what 45,000 units, it's not some abstract number. It's 45,000 units ready to go in community after community after community. And they're counting on us to help to make sure that they can get those final projects and rooftops built. And you know what? Once those 45,000 units are built, it will clear the pipeline for the next 45,000 units to come forward. This is how we meet the demand and the desperate need for affordable housing in this state. And if you want to support communities that are grappling with their RHNA obligations and otherwise, you have to support this. There's no way to do that. You cannot meet your legal obligations in the state on housing without this bond. It's simply impossible. It cannot be done. Now, there's been a lot of debate about some of the target populations that are here in this bill on this floor. And the only thing that's different about this version of the bill compared to the earlier versions that were on this floor and on the floor of the other body where it achieved broad bipartisan support the main differences are the addition of billion for veterans housing the centerpiece of this bond act And it is not window dressing This will be the largest investment of state bond resources for veterans housing in the history of California, and not by a small amount. Up till now, the largest was $600 million. $600 million. That's a lot less than $1.25 billion. And in fact, if you add all the housing bonds for veterans in the history of California, they do not add up. They do not add up to $1.25 billion. The veterans assistance for the CalVent program is the centerpiece of this legislation and is desperately needed. And with all due respect to my colleague who suggested otherwise, veterans are looking for a hand up and some help here. They're not looking for a marketing campaign. They're not looking for a brochure. What they need is help on interest rates and down payment assistance, and that's exactly what this legislation will do. Many of us will be out during the summer and in the fall with our neighbors and our districts volunteering on Habitat for Humanity projects. Habitat for Humanity depends on the $600 million that's in this bond for the CalHome program. It is the most important state program that helps to make sure that Habitat for Humanity can engage communities and their labor partners and others in order to deliver housing for those that need it in their community. This is what this is all about. And so I am very proud of the immense work that's occurred both in this body and in the other house to bring this forward. It is both tackling some of the most some the specific challenges that farm workers and veterans and youth and and college students under their space while also keeping our eye on the big prize which is devoting the majority of these funds in order to assure that we get those 45,000 units in the state that hundreds and hundreds of communities all across California just need in order to make those rooftops available for the for their residents who need them the most. Thank you so much to the President Pro Tem for her
leadership on this issue, and I urge an aye vote. Senator Seattle, you are recognized.
Thank you very much, Mr. President and colleagues. I rise today because I am opposed to this approach to doing all of the things that every single one of us agree on. All of those line items in this bond measure is something that is important to all of us. We all recognize the need to do some of these programs and some of the building that is enclosed in this bond. Bonds are for building infrastructure. Bonds are for building buildings that are going to be there for 30 years. They are not for programs that are going to go for four or five years, only to find that at the end, you're holding the bag on the interest payments for those bonds, and now you need another bond to pay for or to continue those programs going forward. we could have solved this problem last week we approved a budget last week of 250 billion dollars for our general fund that's that's 25 billion dollars more than we had last year and then we found that we even had 5 billion more than we thought we were going to have on top of the 25 Now granted half that goes to Prop 98 but that still leaves us with about 15 billion dollars that we could have done every single one of these things last week Got the money in the pipeline and started fixing all these problems But we chose not to We chose to fund a bunch of other stuff that I think every single one of you needs to go through and look at those line items. Look at what we were paying for. Because you know what? Those things, a lot of those things, aren't as important as what we're saying is of utmost importance today. Revenue bond versus GO bond. We could put a revenue bond. I think we might even agree if we knew that what we said we were going to build for those veterans was actually going to get built. I've seen some great veterans communities, veterans homes that have been built out there, and I ask myself over and over, we could build 10 of those for a billion dollars. Why don't we? Instead, we take the $1.2 billion revenue bond, stick it on this so that people can say, hey, if you're not voting for this, you must not like the veterans. What a bunch of BS. We do like the veterans. What I don't like to do is use $10 billion, pay $435 million in interest for the next 30 years on that, which comes right out of our general fund revenue, and get $5 billion worth of things. Because if anybody can name the whole $6.38 billion of bond money that we generated from 2024's bond, let me know what we got for that. Folks, we are not efficient. We don't build things efficiently. We've added costs to building. And now, instead of paying for things up front and doing it the smart way, we take all of our money, including the $25 billion that we didn't even think we were going to have this year, we spend it on other stuff and then we borrow for the stuff that we desperately need. I agree with all of you. All of these things that you have been talking about today, we've been hand-wringing about, and oh my God, the poor veterans. Absolutely, we agree with you. We need to do something. And you know what? We could have done it. That's your choice. So yeah, my choice is I'm not voting for this. I vote to spend $10 billion and get rid of some of the stuff that we voted for earlier in this budget and spend it right now on all these things so that every single person can benefit from that. They don't have to wait. They don't have to wait until November. We can start spending that right in two weeks. So November comes, everybody's got their fingers crossed that the temperature of the public out there is going to say, yeah, we're all for spending another $10 billion. And adding that $10 billion to the $70 billion we already owe, and by the way that's that we have 40 billion more in obligation are that are open so that we can borrow 40 billion more we have almost 130 billion dollars of bonded indebtedness that before we pay for anything we got to pay the 7 billion dollars for principal and interest on those bonds that just the outstanding ones right now so folks these are choices don't act like they're not these are choices what you're choosing to do is borrow money pay twice as much for whatever it is that we going to borrow money for we get half the benefit we know it We been doing this a long time We not going to get what we want out of this bond We're going to find ways to water it down. In 10 years, nobody's going to know that we passed this bond. All they're going to be doing is holding the bag on a $450 million a year payment. And we're going to be asking them for another bond, saying exactly the same things that we said today, the same thing that we said three years ago, and the same thing that we said 20 years ago. Folks, this cycle needs to stop. We need to be more responsible. We talked about this earlier. We need to be more responsible how we manage the money of our taxpayers, because guess what? We're not managing it right. So with that, I would simply ask that you take that into consideration. Yes, you can go. I know where this is going, but I cannot join you in that. And it's not because I don't care. That's absurd. It's because I know there's a better way for us to do this. We just won't do it. I ask for your no vote.
Senator Varadayos, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. members i rise because i can't support this bill and there are things i like in this bond there are things i really dislike in this bond but my biggest concern here is its labeling its labeling that is dishonest and deceptive from my opinion we have conversations all the time we pass policy all the time about truth and laboring. Truth and labeling. In California, to be a California wine, you have to have 70% of your grapes grown from California. Olive oil, the same thing. Yet this bond is labeled as a veterans bond when less than 10% of its revenue is going to actual veterans. For me, there is not truth in this labeling. And in the words of Alanis Morissette, isn't it ironic? Don't you think? I won't bust out into song here, but this is deceptive. And I will not support this on the backs of our veterans when a significant portion of it is not going to our veterans. I urge a no vote.
Seeing all discussion and debate has ceased. Senator Pro Tem Limon, you are able to close.
Thank you, members. I appreciate the discussion and the intensity of the conversation. It's reflective of what a priority this is for us as a House. I also want to say something, and I say this with the utmost respect. When it comes to irony, the irony is also that under the last Republican governor, we issued $90 billion in bonds, in today's dollars. It is also true that our bond ratio is the lowest it has been since those times. So we understand, no matter what side of the aisle we are on, that we have had to make these investments for our community. And that our community has welcomed the opportunity to ensure that the priorities of Californians are are at the forefront. We don't take bonds lightly. We do it out of necessity and need to address the issues Californians are asking us to address. Today we are doing that for housing. Housing is important to so many communities and there's been a lot of talk about the multiple communities that benefit including our veterans and one fact that also holds true is that you look at this bond and you look at the fact that it is going to help different communities, our veteran community has the largest chunk. That is also a fact because we understand how important it is for Californians to see housing for everyone. Californians have asked for that. They want housing for everyone. And you are right. This pot shares it and distributes to a whole number of folks, all in need. I respectfully ask for an aye vote.
Secretary, please call roll. Allen.
Aye.
Alvarado Gil.
Archuleta.
Aye.
Aragon.
Aye.
Ashby.
Aye.
Becker.
Aye.
Blakespeare.
Aye.
Cobaldon.
Aye.
Caballero.
Aye.
Cervantes.
Aye.
Choi.
Cortese.
Aye.
Daly.
Durazo.
Aye.
Aye.
Gonzales.
Aye.
Grayson.
Aye.
Grove.
Hurtado.
Aye.
Jones.
Laird.
Aye.
Limon.
Aye.
McGuire.
Aye.
Aye.
McNerney.
Aye.
Menjabar.
Aye.
Nilo.
Ochoa Bog.
Padilla.
Aye.
Perez.
Aye.
Reyes.
Richardson.
Aye.
Rubio.
Aye. Strickland? No. Humbert? Aye.
Valadeiros? Wahab? Aye.
Weber Pearson? Aye.
Weiner? Aye. Rubio Aye. Secretary, please call absent members. Abraado Gil? Choi? Daly? Grove? Jones? Nilo? Ochoa Bogue? Reyes? Valadeiros? Ayes 29, noes 2. Assemblymember amendments are concurred in. Members, we are moving to consideration of the daily file, Senate third reading file in particular, item number 80, SCR 189. From the Majority Leader's desk, Senator Rubio, you are recognized. Secretary, please read. Senate concurrent resolution 189 by Senator Rubio relative to I Love's SGV Day. Senator Rubio, you are now recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, I rise proudly to present SCR 189, which designates June 26, 2026, as I heart SGV day in California, and it celebrates the rich history, culture, and enduring legacy of our beautiful San Gabriel Valley. The San Gabriel Valley is one of California's most vibrant and diverse regions, encompassing 31 cities and unincorporated communities across more than 374 square miles. It spans three senators and six assembly members. For generations the San Gabriel Valley has played a vital role in shaping California story contributing to our state economic growth educational excellence cultural vitality and the spirit of innovation The region is home to an extraordinary diverse city of cultures languages, and traditions, making it a powerful example of the strength that comes from California's multicultural communities. The San Guerrero Valley is also defined by a strong commitment to community service, civic engagement, and regional collaboration, bringing together residents, businesses, schools, nonprofit organizations, and local governments in pursuit of our shared goals. Through the SGV iHeart SGV Day campaign, residents throughout the region have embraced a shared sense of pride and identity and celebrating the people, places, institutions, and traditions that make the Sanguero Valley unique. The iHeartSGV campaign, recognizing this resolution, falls on June 26th, represented numerically as 626, which reflects the iconic 626 area code that has become synonymous with the Sanguero Valley and serves as a source of pride for all of us in that region. In addition, the Sanguero Valley COG, the Council of Government, which was established in 1994, serves as the largest and most diverse sub-regional Council of Governments in Los Angeles County. It represents that collaboration and working spirit that is represented in everyone that lives in the SGV. I want to take a moment to thank the COG for our incredible partnership. Earlier today, we were talking about housing, and we just hit a milestone in the Sangaro Valley. Together with our regional housing trust, we just built 1,038 affordable housing units, which I'm very proud of, and 130 interim housing units that help homeless individuals get back on their feet. So again, I'm so proud to collaborate and be part of the tapestry of this wonderful community. SCR 189 recognizes that type of partnership and its contributions to California's economy. I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Senator Perez, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. and I'm proud to rise in support of SCR 189 by the good senator from the city of Baldwin Park. I love the San Gabriel Valley and very proud to be born and raised from the SGV. The SGV expands an entire region between the city of Los Angeles and San Bernardino County. This is an area where you have Trader Joe's, which so many of you in this chamber know and love, was founded under the first Trader Joe's in the United States, opened up right in the San Gabriel Valley. And we have so many other businesses that really started and were founded in the SGV. We are a food community, one that has a very diverse food culture. We have one of the first Asian ethno burbs to ever exist in the United States in the city of Monterey Park. We offer some of the best Asian cuisine, I would argue, in the state of California, and just continue to host a diversity of communities in the region It is part of what makes us so proud and part of what brings our identity together is that we have such a strong diverse cultural background that we have so many different and diverse immigrant communities that are represented within the SGV, and it is part of what makes our region so great and so fabulous. We really are the gem of the Los Angeles County region. I urge an aye vote.
Senator Archuleta, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. I rise as a member of the valley, San Gabriel Valley. I live there. My kids have been grown up there. And what a great, great area of California. We have everything. But the economy that comes from the San Gabriel Valley is amazing. Right now on the drawing board, I can think of 1,100 houses ready to be built right off the bat. 1,100 ready to go when we're talking about the band, the bond rather. 1,100 houses. We've got freeways. We've got mountains. We've got recreation. The San Gabriel Valley is a beautiful place in California. We urge you all to stop and visit when you come to Southern California. It's not just Disneyland. but I tell you what, there's a place where economy grows, jobs, you name it, we've got it. And I'm so proud to be a member of the San Gabriel Valley. We just love it. So it is a great day to say I love the San Gabriel Valley. Thank you. And I urgently support and ask for your vote on SCR 189.
Seeing no further discussion, Senator Rubio, would you like to close? Yes, I want to thank my colleagues for their words, for adding to why we're so proud of our community. But I want to say, as I traveled all over the world, you cannot go anywhere without knowing Sriracha that comes from our district. You can't go anywhere in California and see those long lines when they're going to get their In-N-Out burger. That's in our district. We have In-N-Out University. We have In-N-Out Museum. So this is the type of iconic places that we have in our community. And I'm wearing the I Love SGV pin. That is our campaign. And as chair of the Sanguero Valley Caucus, I'm just so honored to be part of such a vibrant community and group of people. With that, I ask for an aye vote. Thank you. Thank you so very much. Members, this item is eligible for unanimous roll call without an objection. Hearing and seeing no objection. Ayes 36, no zero. The resolution passes. And we are going to return to privileges of the floor. Senator Rubio, from the Majority Leader's desk, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. I would like to invite two extraordinary people in our San Gero Valley community. First, Ed Rees, San Gero Valley Council of Government President and Claremont Vice Mayor. I also would like to invite Ricky Choi onto the floor. He is the Sanguero Valley Council of Governments Director of Government and Community Relations. Both have been extraordinary leaders. They are part of why we just hit 1,038 affordable housing units, and this campaign is only going to highlight how incredible our community is. Please help me welcome our guest to the floor. Thank you, Mr. President. And if anyone would like to join in the back for pictures this is the time to do it Senators, we are going to break for lunch for 30 minutes. Please stay in the building and return promptly. I do want to recognize the majority leader, Senator Ashby. You are recognized when you're ready. Yes, thank you, Mr. President. We will be caucusing. The Democratic caucus will be in room 205. And the Republican caucus will be in room 215. We will caucus for at least 30 minutes. Thank you. The Senate is in recess. Thank you. Members, the Senate is back in session, and we are going to go back to motions, resolutions, and notices to recognize any members. We do have one mic raised. All right. Senator Ochoa-Vogue, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate. At the request of the author, please remove file item A13, AB112 from the inactive file. The desk will note. Thank you. Continue on, Sister. At the request of the author, please place file item 176, AB1273 on the inactive file, Sir. Thank you, Senator. The desk will note. I'm seeing no other microphones raised. Members, we are going to move on. Move on to consideration of the daily file. The second reading file. Secretary, please read. Assembly Bill 2595, 1542, 2058, 1537, 1646. The second reading file will be deemed read. We are moving to the governor's appointments. We have items 56, 57, 58, and 59. Members, we will go to item 56 for governor's appointments. Okay. Thank you, Mr. President. Colleagues, file item number 56 is a confirmation of Dr. Lucina Profata. Luciana Profata. You should have done this one. For reappointment to the California Commission on Disability Access, she previously served as the Chief Deputy Director for the Department of Rehabilitation, and she first joined the Commission in 2023. She was approved at the Rules Committee on a 5-0 vote. Respectfully asked for an aye vote. Thank you, Senator. Seeing no mics raised for discussion or debate, Secretary, please call roll. Allen. Aye. Alvarado Gil. Archuleta. Aye. Aragon. Aye. Ashby. Becker. Aye. Blake Spear. Aye. Cabaldon. Aye. Caballero. Aye. Cervantes. Aye. Choi. Aye. Cortese. Aye. Daly. Durazo. Aye. Gonzalez. Aye. Grayson. Aye. Grove. Aye. Aye. Hurtado. Aye. Jones. Laird. Aye. Aye. Limon. Aye. McGuire. Aye. McNerney. Aye. Menjabar. Aye. Nilo. Aye. Ochoa Boog. Aye. Padilla. Aye. Perez. Aye. Reyes. Richardson. Aye. Rubio. Aye. Aye. Stern? Aye. Strickland? Aye. Umbert? Aye. Valadares? Aye. Wahab? Aye. Weber Pearson? Aye. Aye. Weiner? Aye. Ashby? Aye. Ayes 36, noes 0. The appointment is confirmed. Moving to item 57.
Senator Grove, you are recognized. Thank you. Mr. President, file item 57 is the confirmation of Sarah Ann Shapiro for reappointing to the California Commission on Disability Access. She is the counsel and former firm of Spencer Fane, and her legal practice focuses on commercial real estate. She serves the Commission's position of Representative California Business Properties Association and was appointed in 2023, approved by the Rules Committee on a 5-0 vote, respectfully
ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Senator. Seeing no mics raised for discussion or debate, Secretary please call roll. McGuire. Aye. McNerney. Aye. Menjabar. Nilo. Aye. Ochoa Vogue. Aye. Padilla. Aye. Aye. Perez. Aye. Aye. Reyes. Richardson. Aye. Aye. Rubio. Aye. Cierto. Aye. Aye. Smallwood Cuevas. Aye. Aye. Stern. Aye. Aye. Strickland. Aye. Aye. Umbert. Aye. Valadares. Aye. Aye. Wahab. Aye. Aye. Weber Pearson. Aye. Aye. Weiner. Aye. The Chair of the Board, aye. Ayes 36, noes 0. Appointment is confirmed. Moving to item 58, Senator Grove, you are recognized.
Thank you. Mr. President, colleagues, file item number 58 is a confirmation of Robin Umberg, the Robin Umberg for appointment to the California Veterans Board Brigadier General Umberg served in the United States Army from 1973 to 2010 and first joined the board in 2018 Her distinguished career includes serving as Undersecretary of the California Department of Veterans Affairs If my colleague from Santa Ana wishes to speak, I would like you to deny him that opportunity for the purposes of, I believe, his comments would be severely prejudiced and that the Brigadier General outranks him very highly. So, respectfully ask for an aye vote. She was confirmed by the Rules Committee on a 5-0 vote. Looking for any type of response.
And we do have. Senator Laird, would you like to speak? Well, thank you, Mr. President. I just wanted to point out that the husband of the person that we are considering is recused. due to conflict of interest. And so when he doesn't vote, I didn't want any of you to think he was laying off in opposition to the appointment. It is because of that recusal. I would ask for an aye vote. Thank you, and I'm sure he appreciates you defending him. Senator Allen, you are recognized. Well, members, I know I probably speak for almost all of this body when I say this is the Umberg we wish we had serving with us here. But if this is the best we have, It would be good to have her serve on this important board, and I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Point well taken. Seeing no other mics raised, Senator Grove, would you like to close?
Absolutely. I concur, one unanimously, like wholeheartedly with my colleague from Santa Monica. I would rather have a female veteran that outranks her husband on this floor any day of the week. Respectfully ask for an aye vote. And it just doesn't end.
Secretary, please call the roll. Allen. Aye. Aye. I'm a broad girl. Archuleta. I again. I ask be I Becker. I place for Ike Walden. I call it. I servant is I Choi I Cortese I Daly to Russell I Gonzalez I Grayson I Grove I with double I Jones Laird I LeMond I McGuire I McNerney I Menjabar? Aye. Nilo? Aye. Ochoa Bok? Aye. Padilla? Aye. Perez? Aye. Reyes? Richardson? Aye. Rubio? Aye. Ciarto? Aye. Smallwood Cuevas? Aye. Stern? Aye. Strickland? Aye. Umberg? Valadares? Aye. Wahab? Aye. Weber Pearson? Aye. Weiner? Aye. Ayes 35, nos 0. The appointment is confirmed. Moving to item 59. Senator Grove, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. Colleagues, file item 59 is a confirmation of Veronica Zerrer for appointment to the California Veterans Board. Now retired from military service, she served both the U.S. Army and the U.S. Navy and is now self-employed as a writer and an author. She has served on the Veterans Board since 2023. She was approved by the Rules Committee on June 17th on a 5-0 vote. Respectfully ask for an aye vote.
Seeing no mics. Yes?
She's not married to anybody on this floor.
Excellent. Thank you for that additional point. Seeing no mics raised for discussion or debate, Secretary, please call the roll. Allen. Aye. Alvarado Gil. Archuleta. Aye. Aragon. Aye. Ashby. Aye. Becker. Aye. Blakespeare. Aye. Cobaldin. Caballero. Aye Cervantes Aye Choi Aye Cortese Aye Daly Durazo Aye Gonzalez Aye Grayson Aye Grove Aye Hurtado Aye. Jones. Laird. Aye. Limon. Aye. McGuire. Aye. McNerney. Aye. Menjavar. Aye. Nilo. Aye. Ochoa Bog. Aye. Padilla. Aye. Aye. Perez. Reyes. Richardson. Aye. Rubio. Aye. Ciarto. Aye. Smallwood Cuevas. Aye. Cern. Aye. Strickland. Aye. Umber. Aye. Valdeiros. Aye. Wahab. Aye. Weber Pearson. Aye. Weiner. Aye. Cobalden. Aye. Secretary, please call absent members. Ayes 35, noes 0. The appointment is confirmed. Members, we are moving to Senate third reading, file item 66, SCR 113. Senator Grove. Thank you. Secretary, please read. Senate Concurrent Resolution 113 by Senator Grove relative to Gold Star Mothers and Families Day.
And Senator Grove, you are recognized. Thank you. Colleagues, today I rise to present SCR 113, which designates September 27, 2026, as Gold Star Mothers and Families Day in California, honoring the families of fallen United States service members. Gold Star families, colleagues, have endured the greatest sacrifice imaginable, the loss of a loved one in service to defend our nation. The tradition of the Gold Star family dates back to World War I, or the Gold Star dates back to World War I when families displayed service flags with a blue star for loved ones serving in the armed forces and a gold star to signify that the family member died in the act of military service. Gold Star Mothers were first nationally observed in 1936, and today Gold Star Mothers and Families Day is observed on the last Sunday in September of each year. Gold Star families continue to serve as examples of the courage, resilience, and patriotism and devotion to this country despite their profound loss. This resolution affirms that California's commitment to recognizing, honoring, and supporting our Gold Star families today and for years ahead. Observing Gold Star Mothers and Families Day reminds us that the cost of freedom is never free, and it's borne not only by those who serve, but also those families who have lost that individual and stand beside them. I respectfully ask for your aye vote.
Thank you, Senator. Senator Minjavar, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. I rise as the co-chair of the newly formed veteran caucus in support of SCR 113. Could you share a little bit what these Gold Star Mothers go through? Before the sun comes up, there is a uniformed officer that is waiting outside the home. Once they see the first light turn on, they put on their cover, they cross the driveway, they make that door knock. for those couple of seconds that ghost star mother is on the other side of that door not knowing that her life is about to change opens the door and immediately once she sees two uniformed officers at the door understands what news she going to get She fall to the floor The officer will try to hold her up as they tell her that her daughter her son was just killed in action It'll be a couple weeks before she'll be reunited with the body because it's a long journey to get our loved ones back from war, back to our soil. That officer will stay with that mom all throughout the process until they lay and bury and pay their last respects. I'm thankful that for the past couple of years, this body has honored the names that we've lost. And by honoring and renaming those names, we are telling the Gold Star mothers that we will never forget their loved, their lost sons and daughters. Respectfully asking for an aye vote. Thank you, Senator. Senator Archuleta, you are recognized. I rise in support of SCR 113 as the chair of the Military and Veterans Committee. On a personal level, my colleague from Los Angeles mentioned the officer knocking on the door. My son, Matthew Archuleta, as a major, was assigned to that duty. And that was his duty to accompany the body and then knock on that door. and he would stay with that Gold Star mother. That day, that night, the next morning, he was there again to take her to church. The next day, he went down to the military base to walk her through all the processing. Day after day, whatever it took, he was there with that family. And it was heartbreaking when I heard the stories because he had to share that and accompany the Gold Star mother to be received by other family members. So he was there standing at the door at the uniform as the family surrounded her and cried and so on. Then he would put her in his car and take her to the next family meeting or the church. So our military holds the Gold Star Mothers as saints, precious, honored individuals who've given up their child to our country in battle, and the sacrifices will never be forgotten. So the Gold Star Mothers, God bless them, and what can we say? Condolences time and time again. But thank you for allowing us to have your child to serve our country. And with that, I ask for an aye vote for SCR 113. Thank you, Senator. Seeing no other mics raised for discussion, Senator Grove, would you like to close?
Absolutely. I'd like to thank my colleagues in the Veterans Caucus for speaking on SCR 13. Colleagues nationally, 1.7 million families have had that knock on their door. 1.7 million families have received the news that they've lost their son or daughter. And 1.7 million families have a letter from the War Department that says, we regret to inform you. And those are some harsh things to think about. So think about those 1.7 million families when you go to bed tonight and thank them for their service because they really laid everything down on the line, including their life, to make sure this country remains free. Respectfully ask for an aye vote.
Thank you, Senator Grove. Secretary, please call roll. This item is eligible for unanimous roll call without objection. Seeing no objection, ayes 36, no zero. The resolution is adopted. Members, give us one moment. Thank you. Members, we are going to be moving to the consent calendar. If there are any members that would wish to remove an item from the consent calendar, now is the time to rise. And seeing that we have one mic raised. Senator Rubio, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. President. At the request of the author, please remove file item 5, AB 2792, Assembly Government Organization Committee number. Also remove file item number 6, AB 2793, Assembly GO Committee as well from the inactive file. Thank you. The desk will note. At this time we will move on with the consent calendar and the special consent calendar. Secretary please read all items on both calendars. Assembly Bill 26, 25, 21, 47. Assembly Joint Resolution 27. Bill 2090, 2331, 1651, 34, 35, 1587, 1653, 1683, 1736, 2320, 2421, 2641, 2652, 2789, 2791, Assembly Concurrent Resolution 191-206-215. Secretary, please call the roll on item 161. Allen. Aye. Aye. Abraud Aguil. Archuleta. Aye. Aregine. Aye. Ashby. Aye. Becker. Aye. Blake Spear. Aye. Cobaldon. Aye. Caballero. Aye. Cervantes. Aye. Choi. Aye. Cortese. Aye. Dally. Durazo. Aye. Gonzalez. Aye. Grayson. Aye. Grove. Aye. Hurtado. Aye. Aye. Jones. Laird. Aye. Limon. Aye. McGuire. Aye, McNerney. Aye, Mandelvar. Aye, Nilo. Aye, Ochoa Pog. Aye, Padilla. Aye, Perez. Aye, Reyes. Richardson. Aye, Rubio. Aye, Ciarto. Aye, Smallwood Cuevas. Aye, Stern. Aye, Strickland. Aye, Umber. Aye. Aye, Valadares. Aye. Aye, Wahab. Aye, Weber Pearson. Aye, Wiener. Aye. Ayes 36, noes 0 on item 161. Ayes 36, noes 0 on all remaining items on the consent calendars. The consent calendars are adopted. members at this time we will move to motions and resolutions to begin with our adjournment in memory Our first adjourn in memory is Senator Grove. Senator Grove, you are recognized.
Members, if we can take conversations off the floor and give our full attention to those that are presenting their adjourn in memory. That would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. Colleagues, I rise today in the memory of eight incredible warriors that lost their lives on June 15, 2026 in a tragic crash of a B-52 Stratofortress at Edwards Air Force Base. While conducting a test flight, the aircraft crashed soon after takeoff, claiming the lives of all on board. These service members and contractors were true American patriots and heroes. They dedicated their lives to upholding and protecting the freedoms that we enjoy. Their careers were defined by service, excellence, and an unwavering commitment to the security of the United States of America. Their loss has been felt deeply across the armed forces, aerospace community, and the nation as colleagues, friends, and loved ones mourn these airmen whose service and sacrifice will leave lasting impact on our communities and our country. My heart goes out to the families and friends of the flight crew, as well as the men and women at Edwards Air Force Base, including the base response teams. Although their final mission ended too soon, they will never be forgotten. As the saying goes, aviators never die, they just fly higher with different wings. In recognition of their service and sacrifice, I respectfully ask that the Senate adjourn in the memory of Colonel Gregory Watson, who leaves behind his wife, Michelle, their six children. He dedicated over 21 years to our nation, logging more than 3,200 flight hours as a B-52 weapons systems officer. He was a Central Illinois native, and Colonel Watson was 53 years old and lived near Shreveport, Louisiana. Lieutenant Colonel Gabriel Estrella. Gabriel leaves behind a wife, Brianna, his step-sons, Noah and Elijah, and their daughter, Sunny. Serving over 17 years as a weapons system specialist officer, he was highly decorated as a combat veteran and served the nation's CalCross multiple globe operations. He was born in Los Angeles, California, and he was 40 years old. Retired Colonel Miles Middleton. He is survived by his wife, Pam Middleton, their 17-year-old daughter and 12-year-old son. A U.S. Air Force test pilot graduate and former commander of the 419th Flight Test Squadron, he flew over 30 different aircraft. He continued his deep dedication to this wing as a civilian test pilot for Boeing. He served as the president of Tehachapi Symphony Board and played a viola with the symphony since 2017. He loved classical music. The symphony dedicated the latest concert on June 21st to his memory. He served in Afghanistan and received several accolades during his service. He was 50 years old and he lived in Tehachapi, California. Major Robert D. Robert leaves behind his wife Ashley and his three children Beverly Eleanor and Corbin He was a Stanford engineer and a combat test instructor pilot and a scoutmaster He served in the United States Air Force for 11 years. He was born in Santa Monica, California, where he lived, and he was 40 years old. Major Brad Hovey is survived by his wife Megan and two children. He was an aerospace engineer graduate from Iowa State University and a recent United States Air Force test pilot school graduate. He had a rare gift of translating complex engineering risk into clear mission goals, representing the vast, the very vast and best of aviation excellence. He served in the United States Air Force for 12 years. He was born in Angola, Iowa, and he was 35 years old. Jeremy Smith is survived by his wife, Lauren Smith, and their two young sons, Fletcher, who was two years old, and Fallon, just four months old. He spent a decade serving a brilliant civilian flight test engineer, and he just returned from paternity leave. He was raised in Oregon before moving to Arizona to attend Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, where he pursued a degree in aeronautics. He was 32 years old, and he lived in Rosemond, California. The remaining two aviators' names will be read after the remarks of my colleague from Antelope Valley. These brave aviators took a final flight, but their legacy of honor, duty, and sacrifice will forever soar in our hearts of a grateful nation. As Isaiah 40, 31 reminds us, but those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar like wings with wings of ingles. May their memory continue to be lifted up and inspire future generations to serve with the same courage, strength, dedication, and devotion. Thank you.
Senator Valadares, you are recognized.
Mr. President, I rise today to recognize and remember two of my constituents, two brave men who lost their lives in the tragic plane crash at Edwards Air Force Base, Major Alexander Davis and Christopher Rashard. Both called Lancaster their home. Both were taken from us too soon. Major Alexander Davis was 34 years old, originally from Hartford, Connecticut, and a graduate of the United States Air Force Test Pilot School. He was an accomplished aerospace engineer who dedicated his life to advancing the technology that keeps our nation safe and our airmen flying. At 34, he had already achieved what most spend a lifetime working towards. He served his country with distinction, and his family should be proud. He is survived by his mother, his aunt, and his uncle, and an extended family who love him deeply. Christopher Rashard was 41 years old and lived in Lancaster with his wife, Rebecca, and their two young children. Christopher served as a test director for JT4 at Edwards for a decade. But what makes his story especially profound is that he was a third-generation Edwards employee. His father worked there. His grandfather worked there before him. Edwards wasn't just where Christopher went to work. It was a place that his family had served for generations. That kind of legacy doesn't just belong to one man. It belongs to a community. To the Davis family, Major Davis mother his aunt and his uncle and all who loved Major Davis the people of Senate District 23 grieve with you To Rebecca and the Reicher children and to the entire Riker family your loss is immeasurable And this community, our community, stands with you. Major Alexander Davis and Christopher Rashar were sons of the Antelope Valley. They showed up, they served, and they gave everything. I ask that we adjourn this day in memory and in honor of them and all of the crash victims and in recognition of all who have felt this incredible loss on the base and the surrounding Mojave and high desert communities.
Thank you, Senator. Our sincere condolences to the family, friends, and peers. Senators, please bring the names of your adjournment memory to the desk to be properly memorialized. Senator Rubio, you are recognized for your first adjournment memory.
Thank you, Mr. President. Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, today I rise with a heavy heart to adjourn in the memory of Rosario Almeida Sauceda, a woman whose life was defined by faith, resilience, creativity, and unwavering devotion to her family. Born in Tetaloba, Sinaloa, Mexico, Rosario built a beautiful life rooted in love, hard work, and compassion. She was a devoted wife of 55 years, a loving mother of five, a proud grandmother of ten, and a cherished great-grandmother of five. Her family was truly her life. She called it vida y amor. The center of her world and the greatest joy of her life has always been her grandchildren. Rosario was a talented seamstress in dress, designer, who created El Boutique de Rosario from her home. Through her artistry and dedication, she transformed fabric into beautiful work of art, each dress stitched with love, care, and creativity. Her work allowed her to remain at home raising her children and later helping care for her grandchildren, creating a home filled with warmth, laughter, hugs, and unconditional love. Rosario inspired those around her to dream big, work hard, and cherish family above all else. She believed deeply in treating others with kindness, gratitude, and respect. She often reminded her children to value their relationships, honor others, and always strive for a better life, just as she had done throughout her own life. Her faith, again, guided her every single day. Rosario lived with grace, forgiveness, compassion, and humility, teaching those around her the beauty of simple moments and the importance of acceptance and love. Her strength and unwavering spirit serves as an example for all of us. Rosario Salceda will be remembered not only for the incredible talent and strong spirit, but for the warmth of her heart and the love she gave so freely. Her legacy lives on in all the lives that she touched. To Rose and the entire family, we mourn with you. Ladies and gentlemen, please help me in adjourning in the memory of Rosario Almeida Salceda. Thank you.
Thank you, Senator. Please bring the name of your adjournment memory to the desk to be properly memorialized. Senator Rubio, you are recognized for your second.
Thank you, Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen of the Senate. Today I rise to adjourn in the memory of Fred Feldheim. Born and raised in New York, his life became marked by uplifting the community of Covina, where he earned the title of Volunteer Extraordinaire. Fred and his formative years attended a site challenge boarding school due to an eye disease He later moved to Los Angeles where he met the love of his life at Nadine at a Sierra Club meeting they had a son together until his wife's death in 2015, they frequently traveled domestically and abroad and joined season tickets to theaters in Los Angeles and Hollywood. For 30 years, he worked for the Avery Dennison Company, known as Avery Labels. A selfless leader deeply invested in local history, Fred became involved with both the Firehouse Jail Museum and the Covina Valley Historical Society, where he served as Vice President under Bob Thiessen. He was committed to supporting the society's mission, which is to preserve and share Covina's past and history. For seven years as a member of the Covina Women's Club, Fred never missed a meeting and always sold tickets for scholarship fundraising drawings until he fell ill. He is recognized as a member extraordinaire also in the Women's Club. Fred also proudly volunteered with Covina Police Department and later became a devoted member of the Friends of Covina Library. Clearly his community service was evident that he loved his beloved Covina and everyone in Covina loved him. He dedicated his life to volunteerism, earning his recognition from the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and later commemorated in the Covina wall at at Covina Park. To his family, his friends, and all the Covina community, we mourn with you. Ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, please join me in adjourning in the memory of Fred Howell. Thank you so very much. Senator, please bring the name of the adjournment memory to
the desk to be properly memorialized. Members, give us one minute. Members, do not go far. Stay near to your desk. We are pausing just for a moment, but we will be with you in just a moment. a minute. Please do not go far. Thank you. Thank you Thank you We are going to Assembly messages. Secretary, please read. Mr. President, I am directed to inform your honorable body that the Assembly on this day adopted Assembly Constitution Amendment 21, Assembly Constitution Amendment 22. Sue Parker, Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Thank you. Members, under motions and resolutions, we are recognizing Senator Ashby. Senator Ashby, you are recognized.
Thank you, presiding officer. Under motions and resolutions, members, I move to suspend the joint rules and Senate rules as they relate to ACA 21 and ACA 22.
Senator Milo, your mic is raised. All right. He's just wanting special attention, feeling lonely in the corner over there. Okay. Okay. Seeing no mics raised for debate or discussion, Secretary, please call the roll. Mr. President, staff was unaware that rules had already been pulled, so we're good. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Any objection to moving to roll call? Seeing no objection. Secretary, please call the roll. Allen. Aye. Avrata Gil. Archuleta. Aye. Aragon. Aye. Ashby. Aye. Becker. Blake Spear. Aye. Cobaldon. Aye. Caballero. Aye. Cervantes. Aye. Choi. Aye. Cortese. Aye. Daly. Durazo. Aye. Gonzalez. Aye. Grayson. Aye. Grove. Aye. Hurtado. Aye. Jones, Laird, Aye, Limon, Aye, McGuire, Aye, McNerney, Aye, Menjabar, Aye, Nilo, Aye, Ochoa Bogue, Padilla, Perez, Reyes, Richardson, Rubio, Criarto, Aye, Smallwood Cuevas, Aye, Aye. Stern? Aye. Strickland? Aye. Humbert? Aye. Valadares? Aye. Wahab? Aye. Aye. Weber Pearson? Aye. Aye. Wiener? Aye. Secretary, please call absent members. Abraudogil Becker Aye Daly Jones Ochoa Bog aye Padilla aye Perez aye Reyes Richardson aye. Rubio, aye. Strickland, aye. Ayes 36, no zero. Rules are suspended. Senator Ashby, you are recognized once again.
Thank you, Mr. President. Members, there are letters at the desk requesting withdrawal of ACA 21 and ACA 22 from the Committee on Rules. I move that ACA 21 and ACA 22 be withdrawn from Committee, ordered to the floor, and that we take them up without reference to file. I ask for an aye vote.
Senator Vatadaris, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. I'd like to request that we substitute the previous roll.
Thank you. Without objection, seeing no objection, ayes 36, no 0. The motion carries. Members, we are going to go to two remaining items, ACA 21, ACA 22, without reference to file. We will hear ACA 21 first. Senator Ashby, you are—Secretary, please read. Assembly Constitution Amendment 21 by Assemblymember Rivas, an act relating to voting. Ashby, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. ACA 21 will direct the Secretary of State to withdraw from the ballot a previously referred measure, ACA 13 of 2023. ACA 13 would have required measures that increased vote thresholds to also clear that same higher vote threshold. ACA 21, in conjunction with ACA 22, will provide the opportunity for us to protect local jurisdictions from harmful effects of a separate measure that would severely impact local government finance. I respectfully ask for an aye vote.
Senator Grove, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. Question of the author. Will the author take a question?
Yes.
So under ACA 21, the proper way to instruct the Secretary of State to withdraw the measures from the ballot measure on this election cycle in November would have been an Assembly Constitutional Amendment. Assembly, excuse me, would have been a concurrent resolution, Assembly Current Resolution. A constitutional amendment requires this measure that we're requesting the Secretary of State to pull to go before the voters, as it's a constitutional amendment that has to go before the voters. My understanding is, both from the Secretary of State's office and from our institutional knowledge individual, Chris McKaylee, that we can fix this next week, but it will be past the deadline of 5 o'clock. my question is do we have a firm commitment from the majority party that this will be addressed so there is not confusion before the voters where they are asked to vote for a ballot measure that was intended to be pulled off of the November ballot and replaced with this deal that was made later today or earlier today Through the President Yes please You may respond
Thank you to the Senator from Bakersfield. Per Legislative Council, an ACA may be removed from the ballot by another ACA or a concurrent resolution as long as it is passed with a two-thirds vote. That being said, as I stated in my earlier comments, ACA 21 will direct the Secretary of State to withdraw from the ballot a previously referred measure, which in this case is ACA 13. Again, so the specific question, and I know my colleague from Orange County will address that as well. The specific question is give assurity to the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. Three attorneys, the attorneys at the Secretary of State's office.
Senator, are you asking a question?
Permission to ask a question. Will you take another question, Senator?
I can answer it in my close.
Senator, continue. Senator Grove.
Okay, so basically this is what happened in 2024. We did an assembly concurrent resolution to be able to do what we're doing today. It did not have to go before the voters because it's a concurrent resolution. We did a, or the assembly did, an assembly constitutional amendment. A constitutional amendment is required to go before the voters. That was confirmed by our esteemed Secretary of State. She, I spoke to her, and I also spoke to the legal counsel, and I spoke to a constitutional attorney who said that it should have been done on the assembly side with this assembly current resolution, having both of the measures brought together to resolve this issue. If we do not have a firm, firm, affirmative, yes, we will fix this next week past the deadline, I am issuing a severe warning to John Kupal at Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association to pick up the phone and call Chris McKaylee and the legal counsel and do not pull this off the ballot until we have an affirmation, a firm affirmation that this will be fixed and there will be no confusion before the voters with both of these measures on the ballot under an assembly constitutional amendment when it should have been a concurrent resolution for both of them to be combined together to pull one off and put one on. But now we're in the position where we have a 5 o'clock deadline, which is an hour and a half away, and we have to pull something off the ballot in not a proper way and then wait to see what happens next week to see if we can put the other one on. And I think it's just a process that has to be followed. I think this represents legal challenges, and I think it should have been handled properly in the first place. And without an affirmation of yes from the majority leader or the Senate pro tem that we will fix this, I cautiously ask John Kupal to pass by the 5 o'clock deadline and just let's make it a loud November issue to protect taxpayers in this state.
Senator Strickland, you are recognized.
Thank you, Mr. President. To further my colleagues' concerns from Kern County, I wouldn't even wait for John Capal. If we don't have a commitment from this floor, I don't think we should move forward at all and vote for this. because historically, as two years ago, we did a Senate concurrent resolution in 2024 to pull, and historically, that's the way we've been doing it, a concurrent resolution. Now, I understand the majority said they had ledge counterfeits commitment, but the person who makes the final determination is the Secretary of State. If that became a problem, that's all we're asking. It probably is good at the resolution stage, but just in case, if it's not, because the final say is the Secretary of State, we want to make sure that we have a firm commitment from the majority that you would fix it if that were the case. That's all we're asking. If not, if we don't have that firm commitment, we won't move forward on either of these items.
Pro Tem Lamone, you are recognized.
Thank you, members. Ledge Council continues to opine that we can move forward in this direction, and we will, of course, fix this. The intent is to remove this off of the ballot, and we are committed to doing that. if there is a difference in legal opinions, those will get resolved, and they will be solved for in our coming sessions next week.
Seeing no mics raised for further discussion or debate,
Senator Ashby, would you like to close? Yes, thank you so much. As the pro tem has just stated, yes, it is the intent of ACA 21 to direct the Secretary of State to withdraw from the ballot the previously referred measure ACA 13. That is our goal, and Ledge Council has directed us that this, so long as it receives a two-thirds vote, is sufficient. I respectfully ask for an aye vote.
I'm Raul Gil Archuleta I I again I Ashby I Becker I play spear I Cabalden I Caballero I Cervantes I Choi I Cortese I Dally Durazo. Aye. Aye. Gonzales. Aye. Aye. Grayson. Aye. Grove. Hurtado. Aye. Jones. Laird. Aye. Limon. Aye. McGuire. Aye. McNerney. Aye. Menjabar. Aye. Nilo. Ochoa Bog. Padilla. Aye. Perez. Aye. Reyes. Richardson. Aye. Rubio. Aye. Cioto. Smallwood Cuevas. Aye. Aye. Stern? Aye. Strickland? Umberg? Aye. Volodaris? Wahab? Aye. Weber Pearson? Aye. Wiener? Strickland, aye. Strickland, aye. Secretary, please call absent members. Alvarado Gill? Daly? Grove? Aye. Jones? Nilo? Aye. Ochoa Boque. Aye. Reyes. Sayarto. Aye. Valadares. Aye. Weiner. Ayes 35, noes 0. The measure passes. Members, we are moving to ACA 22. Secretary please read Assembly Constitution Amendment 22 by Assemblymember Wicks in acronym to taxation Senator Gonzalez you are recognized Good afternoon, Senators and Mr. President. I'm here today to present ACA 22, which provides clarity for local governments on vote thresholds for special taxes. When it comes to our communities, we are here fighting to protect the core services, as we know, police, fire, park programs, health care, and providing local governments with the tools to solve local needs. Effective January 1, 2027, the constitutional amendment, which would be placed on the November 2026 ballot, would require that all special taxes be approved with a two-thirds vote. This would be prospective in nature and not affect special taxes that are currently in effect. Taken in conjunction with ACA 21, these measures combined protect local communities from harmful effects that a separate measure would directly threaten. I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Seeing no mics raised for discussion or debate, Secretary, please call roll. Allen. Aye. Alvarado Gil. Archuleta. Aye. Aragon. Aye. Ashby. Aye. Becker. Aye. Blake Spear. Aye. Cobaldon. Aye. Caballero. Aye. Cervantes. Aye. Choi. Cortese. Aye. Daly. Durazo. Aye. Aye. Gonzalez. Aye. Grayson. Aye. Grove. Aye. Hurtado. Aye. Jones. Laird. Aye. Limon. Aye. McGuire. Aye. McNerney. Aye. Menjavar Aye Nilo Ochoa Bog Padilla Aye Perez Aye Reyes Richardson Aye Rubio Aye Ciaro Smallwood Cuevas, Aye, Stern, Aye, Strickland, Aye, Umberg, Aye, Valdez, Aye, Wahab, Aye, Weber Pearson, Aye, Weiner, No. Secretary, please call absent members. Ayes 35, noes 1. The measure is adopted. If there is no other business, Pro Tem Le Monde, the desk is clear. Thank you, Members. The next floor session will be on Monday, June 29th at 2 p.m. The Senate will be in recess until the Senate is adjourned. We will reconvene Monday, June 29, 2026 at 2 p.m. The Senate is adjourned. Thank you.