Skip to main content
Committee HearingSenate

Ohio Senate Education Committee - 6-2-2026

June 2, 2026 · Education Committee · 15,653 words · 12 speakers · 89 segments

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Commission Committee to order. Will the clerk please call the roll?

Senator Issenator

Present. Here.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

We have a quorum present. The minutes of the prior meeting are on the iPads. Are there any corrections, additions, or changes to the minutes of the prior meeting? Hearing none, the minutes will be approved as written. We're going to start off with just, there's going to be a presentation by the Department of Educational Workforce. We're going to do bill sponsor hearings first, and then we'll do that. Then we'll go into proponent testimony on these other bills, just to let everybody know what's going on. So start off today with Senate Bill 442 for its first hearing, provided by sponsors Senators Reynolds and Smith. So welcome to committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Senator Michele Reynoldssenator

Thank you, Chair Brenner. Vice Chair Blessing and Ranking Member Ingram and members of the Senate Education Committee, thank you for the opportunity to provide sponsor testimony on Senate Bill 442, the Food Literacy Standards Act. Senate Bill 442 is a bipartisan, forward-thinking measure designed to prepare Ohio students for healthy, productive lives through practical education that connects nutrition, agriculture, wellness, and real-world decision-making. My esteemed colleague, joint sponsor Kent Smith, and I were recently recognized by the Children's Hunger Alliance as one of the legislators of the year for efforts to address child hunger and food insecurity in Ohio. While I am grateful for that recognition, it also reinforces the important truth that solving hunger is not simply about access to food. It's also about education, knowledge, and long-term prevention. Food literacy helps bridge that gap. Senate Bill 442 establishes age-appropriate food literacy standards for students in grades K-12 to increase understanding of nutrition, healthy eating habits, food preparation, agriculture, food systems, and where our food comes from. The legislation also encourages collaboration between the Ohio Department of Agriculture and the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce to ensure instruction reflects both sound educational practices and Ohio's agricultural strengths. This bill is rooted in one simple idea. Preparing students for the future should include teaching practical life skills. Students are taught mathematics to manage finances, science to understand the natural world, and civics to become informed citizens. Food literacy simply equips young people with the knowledge that they will use every day how nutrition affects physical, mental health, and how food choices impact long-term wellness and how agriculture connects to their lives and communities. This is especially important in Ohio because Ohio, like much of the nation, continues to face growing health concerns tied to poor nutrition and chronic disease. Conditions such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and hypertension carry significant consequences for families, workforce productivity, health care systems, and educational outcomes. Early exposure to healthy habits and nutrition education can help students develop informed decision-making skills before unhealthy patterns become lifelong challenges. Importantly, Senate Bill 442 is not intended to create unnecessary mandates or burdens on educators or school districts. Instead it provides a framework for age instruction that can complement existing educational goals and support schools in equipping students with practical applicable knowledge This legislation also recognizes Ohio's unique identity as an agricultural state. Ohio is the seventh largest producer of corn and soybeans in our nation. Our state is home to approximately 75,000 farms, spanning more than 14 million acres. Agriculture contributes more than $124 billion annually to Ohio's economy, and Ohio remains a national leader in products including eggs, tomatoes, and grapes. Yet many young people grow up disconnected from the very systems that feed their families and drive our economy. Food literacy helps students understand and appreciate the role of agriculture, farming, food production, and the hardworking individuals who sustain our communities. It strengthens awareness of Ohio's agricultural heritage while helping students make informed choices about health and nutrition. As a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee and as someone committed to strengthening Ohio's families, I believe education should prepare students not only for careers in college but also for life. Food literacy is about more than just what's on a plate. It's about health, responsibility, critical thinking, agriculture, and empowering the next generation with practical skills and knowledge that supports lifelong well-being. Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, and Ranking Member Ingram, and members of the Senate Education Committee, thank you for your consideration of Senate Bill 442. I respectfully ask for your favorable consideration of this legislation, and I'll now turn it over to my joint sponsor for additional comments.

Senator Kent Smithsenator

Thanks very much. Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram, and members of the Senate Education Committee, Senator Reynolds and I greatly appreciate the opportunity to provide sponsored testimony in support of Senate Bill 442, the Food Literacy Standards Act, to provide Ohio children with a basic understanding of food as fuel and diet as health care. Consider this legislation to be financial literacy for child nutrition. If this becomes law, Senate Bill 442 would direct the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce to develop grade-specific instruction on diet, food preparation, nutrition, and healthy food choices. The legislation would mandate the department to develop these standards, but these standards would be permissive for each school district. The goal is that kids will learn the impact of food and how the choices they make regarding what they eat will impact how they feel and their overall health. This Senate bill can become that guidepost providing life-changing knowledge to Ohio's future leaders. When armed with knowledge and conviction, our students can achieve longer lifespans and an increased quality of life. These newly educated healthy eaters can change their communities. Then these newly educated healthy eaters can change their communities for the better. Senator Reynolds and I appreciate your time and consideration. We urge adoption of Senate Bill 442 and would welcome any questions that the committee might have. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you, Senators. Are there any questions from committee members? Ranking Member Ingram.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you for this bill. Where is nutrition being taught now? I mean obviously this is permissive legislation but the state does not have food nutrition standards coming out of its you know as curriculum coming out of its Department of Education At least that's my understanding.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Follow-up?

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Senator Michele Reynoldssenator

You're right. We don't have health standards either. So the question becomes, are students already learning about nutrition in some way, even if it's in their science class or, I know, in elementary school? And I guess maybe my concern is that when we start talking standards, we start talking testing. Testing then means that we have to prepare and therefore be, those students be prepared to take a test on their nutrition. And what I'm hoping to see, and maybe I'll get with the Department of Education and Workforce later, is how they're going to blend this into what some districts already do. Kids are growing things in boxes outside, and there's some schools that have little farms of their own where they're doing so. I don't want this to become I only want it to feel like it's another mandate even though it is being mandated to the department but I want to make sure that it blends in with work that's already being done. Obviously I would invite my joint sponsor to share her thoughts also but that being said this is not designed to put any additional burdens on any of the public school districts. This is designed to have the Department of Education and Workforce think about what are science-based standards as to their age-appropriate for learning so that kids can learn about the impacts of food and making healthy dietary choices and all of that. Because we feel like they're not getting that right now. In the same way, the reason I paralleled it to financial literacy is one of the reasons that financial literacy has been a discussion among the Ohio General Assembly is I think all of us as adults recognize how much better off we would be if we would have gotten this as kids. That's the same principle that I think we're bringing to this topic, which is we don't want to turn this into an exam. We don't want to turn this into a mandate. We recognize that Ohio's future leaders will be better equipped and live longer, healthier lives if they just learn this stuff. And we don't think they're getting it right now. And we think that it should be, that it's important enough that we would like to see grade-specific standards that then, after those are developed, I think school systems would look at that and say, we need to pull some of this into our curriculum.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Very well said. Any more follow-up? Would you like to continue to grill Senator Smith? Just kidding. I do have a serious question and a non-serious question. The serious question is, do you know how many school districts, what is being used now? Because I believe there is some. I think this is kind of a follow-up to Ranking Member Ingram's question and how many districts might be doing something along this line. So to the Chair, we don't have a broad sense or a narrow sense, if you will, of what school districts are doing, but it's not necessarily uniform. This is something that we learned during the Children's Hunger Alliance annual event that they have that there are lots of other states that are getting on board with some sort of food education and nutrition standards and Ohio is one of the states that kind of absent in that space Obviously, there are school districts that are doing some things, but there's no level of uniformity at all. And so, like my joint sponsor said, it's something to pretty much raise awareness. This is not something that's intended to create more burden. It's to raise awareness. and with us being such an agricultural state and food being so important. And food is like a medicine, right? We have lots of mental health challenges. We have health challenges. And so learning about food and making sure that that's incorporated into what's already going on in the classroom seems to be very relevant and something that we should be doing.

Senator Issenator

Would this require like what we did as kids? You had a home ec back in the 1980s, early 90s, and that went away, so kids were actually learning how to cook foods as opposed to go out and get fast food meals every day. Would that be part of what you're looking to do here?

Senator Michele Reynoldssenator

So, Mr. Chair, we have purposely put in the bill that Department of Education and Workforce would actually collaborate with Department of Ag to come up with age-appropriate curriculum, but in the age of DoorDash and all of the various things and how we can get food, and it's a microwave generation, we would hope that there would be some things that are modified for today that would actually help kids understand, like in home ec, back in the day when I was in home ec, on what was appropriate for that time. I think that we should be looking at how to adapt that for this time.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

All right.

Senator Issenator

And for a non-serious question, can we put an amendment in here to show kids how to properly dab up all the grease on top of their school pizza?

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Seeing no other questions, thank you, Senators. Yes, we can do that. All right, we'll do that then. All right. With that, that will conclude the first hearing on Senate Bill 442. Up next is Senate Bill 332 for its first hearing, Senators Katrona and Smith again. Welcome back to committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Senator Issenator

I missed you terribly. I bet you did. Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram, and members of the Senate Education Committee, thank you very much for providing us an opportunity to explain why the policy of the state taking over local public school districts should be abolished. Senate Bill 332 would end all academic distress commissions and transfer those powers back to local leaders and local elected school board members. It would also require, however, that districts under state control would need to establish student support teams within individual buildings that fail to meet certain academic criteria. It's been 10 years as of this past February since the Youngstown City School District was taken over by the state of Ohio. Following Youngstown, Lorraine, then East Cleveland were taken over by the state. Following the takeover of these three districts, the state abandoned the takeover policy so no other district would be taken over, which suggested that the takeover policy was not achieving the desired results. Today, 10 years later, Lorraine and East Cleveland are both out from under state control, but Youngstown remains. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, the state takeover model has been tried, and it has failed. Let me share with the committee part of an editorial posted March 17, 2019, from the Canton Repository entitled Time for Ohio to Abolish State Takeovers. It reads in part, quote, What began as a noble carrot and stick idea, however, shown little evidence of improving educational outcomes where it is in place, Youngstown, Lorraine, East Cleveland. It can be argued, in fact, things are worth. with more parental disconnect, low employee morale, and high administration turnover reported in those districts. We urge lawmakers and the governor to end this failed idea, unquote. Members of the Senate Education Committee, that's exactly what Senate Bill 332 seeks to do because the Columbus Knows Best approach has not worked. I believe that every Ohio child can change the world. Perhaps the next great Lordstown innovation is currently in a Youngstown classroom. Perhaps the solution to the Lake Erie Algae crisis is a Lorraine student. Perhaps the next great civil rights leader is walking down an East Cleveland school hallway right now. I would be willing to bet that those three school districts will each be sending Ohio a few future senators. These kids, our kids, can do great things, but we need to help ensure their potential is fully realized. realized, local voices should be listened to and local voters should be able to exercise their judgment. Thank you for allowing us to give sponsor testimony on this important bill. We'd be happy to answer any questions following Senator Katrona's remarks. Almost made a mistake there. To the chair, I appreciate you taking the time to allow us to speak on this important piece of legislation. As the senator that represents the Youngstown area, this is something that is very troubling to my community and what my bill is looking to seek to do is to give back local control at the end of the day i think the locals know best the columbus knows best approach it clearly has not worked and that is pretty evident we're the standalone uh community the standalone school in this in the city that's still under this takeover and as they've given a short reprieve from that um you know we're actually seeing improvements in my local school district and so So it's my hope that with the support of this committee that we can make the changes necessary so that we can get out of this state takeover and get back to having the locals make decisions for our children as they move forward. And I appreciate your time. I'm happy to answer any questions you guys might have for us.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you, Senator. Is there any questions from committee members?

Senator Issenator

I'm just going to make a comment. And it was my bill that Senate modified 10 years ago to put the Youngstown plan into. I also agree that I think we need to do something else because this isn't working. Do you have any thoughts on an alternative plan that would be able, either whether it's a local plan or some other way of handling getting the schools turned around? I've looked at the Youngstown numbers. they're they went up from the pandemic a bit but they're still very low uh with some passage rates still in the single digits uh or at least in the low teens uh from the year prior um any thoughts on to what to do to replace it with something that may work uh through the chair you know i i can all i can speak to is the fact that um you know i know that uh based upon the star system that we've incorporated, we have seen major changes in the right direction. My hope is that we can put in place something where we give it back to the locals to reiterate that. I'm open to having the discussion. If you guys have some insight on that, I'd be happy to be all ears. Senator, I don't know if you want to add to that. I will briefly, yeah. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for the question. Yeah I mean that bill might actually have been the answer that we were looking for which was kind of the Euler school model The recognition that students with challenging non-cognitive factors, poverty, you know, primarily poverty, are going to have some challenges outside of the classroom that are going to impact them inside the classroom. I mean, me and the vice chair tried to touch on one of those with our free breakfast in school legislation that has yet to get a hearing in Senate Finance. One of the things, just looking at the data, and again, this is from a few years ago, but I think it speaks to the challenges that these three districts have. Back before the pandemic, Ohio's median household income was $69,632. The median household income in East Cleveland at that point was $19,952. In Youngstown, it was $24,448. In Lorain, it was $35,753. I mean, so in each of the districts that were taken over, by a factor of one-half, the household income was below the state average. And in East Cleveland and Youngstown, it was much more. So getting back to the question that you asked, again, it might have been the original, I think it was House Bill 70, making sure I have the initials right. But yeah, the wraparound model of community supports that was the Euler school model in the Cincinnati area is probably what high poverty districts need to help their kids succeed. If I can just piggyback off of that, Chairman.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

I think the legislation that was originally put in place, I think it came from a good place. I think the idea was that we want to help schools improve. We want to make sure that children have the best and brightest future possible. I think it's also fair to say that every community is different, and some communities are plagued with unique obstacles that are in front of them. And so I think there's not a cookie-cutter approach that we can really take. And so all I can say is that with the trends that we're making in this, at least in Youngstown specifically, which is the only school, by the way, that's still in this takeover, you know, we've seen major increases of over 20 percent from 21 to 22. And so a lot of this performance improvement has been since we've had, you know, we haven't had a CEO. We've given it back to the school board members. I think that there's a lot of efforts that we've made as a state legislature from 2007 that has helped out dramatically where I think that we've recognized some shortfalls. And so I think that collectively I think it's fair to say that we've taken a lot of steps as a state, and I think it's important to let that play out. And if we need to reassess, we can always do so. All right. Well, thank you for your testimony today. This will conclude the first hearing on Senate Bill 332. Up next, we'll have a presentation from the Department of Education and Workforce on the English Language Arts and Social Studies updated curriculum, I guess. If you would, come on forward. I don't know who wants to start first. I've got Chris Woolard and I've got Melissa Mayer. Feel free to start, Chris. And then I think we've got some stuff on the iPads and up on the TV. So for the members, the presentations are on the bottom of your iPads. You may proceed. Thank you.

Chair Brenner, Vice Chair of Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram, members of the Senate Education Committee good afternoon I Chris Fullard the Chief Integration Officer at the Department of Education and Workforce Thank you so much for the opportunity to share some information on a proposed administrative rule change related to the early literacy component of the Ohio School Report Card. I'm only going to be, the rule itself is only a small piece of the report card. It's not the entire report card. It's only related to the early literacy piece. so you probably won't get as much as me as you normally do when I'm up here presenting on the report card. But I do want to talk through some important changes. So the proposed administrative rule updates relate to the rating scale on the early literacy component. Again, we have star ratings, and that rating scale is where the lines are drawn to determine what is a one star, two star, three star, and so forth. Most of the details of the component are prescribed in revised code. So the rule itself is dealing with the rating scale. A little bit of context about why we're here and where we're at. So again, the early literacy component is the component of the report card that is aligned to our focus on literacy outcomes. You're going to hear some more stuff from that from Melissa later on. But the early literacy component essentially contains three pieces. There are three measures to it. The first being proficiency on third grade reading as measured by the state assessment. The second piece is the improving K-3 literacy piece, which is the improvement pieces from kindergarten to first grade, first grade to second grade, second grade to third grade, and had previously been the promotion rate. So initially when this was created and the third grade reading guarantee was in place, and it was what percentage of students were promoted to fourth grade by meeting the third grade reading guarantee. Those were the three pieces that made up this component. And in fact, when we rate them, they're basically combined together, and those percentages, the 40% of the proficiency, 25% on improvement, and then 35% on promotion, those are also prescribed in revised code. So those are the three pieces this has been in place. there have been some changes in recent years to the third grade reading guarantee, which then prompted last year in the state budget cycle some proposed changes to this measure to account for the fact that the third piece related to the promotion rate had changed. So House Bill 96, last year's budget, changed that third piece from being what percentage of students were promoted based on the third grade reading guarantee to the percentage of students that met the promotion score, which is also now set in revised code to be the same as proficiency. There are implications to this. So this essentially, by this change in statute, creates a situation that without updating and calibrating the rule on the grade scale, we would have a scenario where the vast majority of schools and districts in the state would receive the lowest rating, a one or a two, on this component on the upcoming report card, simply due to changes in the law, not necessarily due to anything as it relates to implementation of literacy or science of reading. But the changes in the law have implications that without calibrating the rule, basically everybody's going to get a one or two. And the reason for that, and again, this is where it starts to get a bit technical, but when the State Board of Education several years ago first made the administrative rules for this report card piece, and they were looking at simulated data, or actual data at the time, looking at that promotion rate what had been there previously most students even when the third grade reading guarantee was in place most students in the state were in fact being promoted So most districts and schools were somewhere in that low to mid to high 90s on that piece of the component So when the state board set the initial rules for that, everybody was doing really well on that third piece. When you take that out and plug in the percent of students that are hitting the proficiency mark, It's actually a much lower distribution statewide. Much fewer students are hitting that proficient mark than were hitting that promotion score several years ago. The practical impacts of that is that when you look at data, the scores drop. And so we've got data in front of you. This is data from last year. The blue represents the actual distribution of the star ratings on last year's report card. We've attempted to put some simulations. We looked at last year's data and said, okay, well, based on the new law, if we would apply that to last year's data, what would things look like? And what you can see here, and I even got a laser pointer now, is that at the district level, again, the vast majority of districts would receive a one or two star. It is even more noticeable when you look at the school ratings where basically the majority of schools in the state would receive the lowest rating possible on the component. Again, just due to the fact that that component has changed so substantially, not necessarily measuring any changes of practice. So accordingly, and like any time we would do that, you know, when there's a substantial change to something about the report card, necessitating an update to the rule, in this case calibrating the grade scale. If you remember last year when there was the college career workforce and military readiness piece was added to the report card, we put something new out or there's a new baseline. We want to make sure that one, that we're both trying to find a balance of having sort of fair expectations but at the same time having high expectations for students. So we try to get, at least as a first shot of things having a somewhat normal distribution, where there's some folks who are really doing well, recognizing that there's schools and districts on the lower end. You're going to see a lot of schools and districts in the middle. We sort of applied that principle in the proposed calibration of this rule. Again, we want to make sure that we want to have high expectations. We do have high expectations. And in fact, on the high end, we increased the score a little bit. And so you're seeing in the simulations that actually somewhat fewer schools and districts are hitting that higher mark, but by the result of this rule change, you're going to see a situation where the ratings are going to be much more normal and would believe fair, as opposed to a situation where on the report card this September where basically everybody gets a one or two just based on the fact that essentially the rules of the game had changed. So we proposed that rule through our normal rulemaking process that was posted for public comment. a few times over the spring. This information was shared at the March DEW public meeting. It is now working its way through the process, which includes a presentation to the House and Senate Education Committees, and then will be filed for JCAR later this month. So again, that's a lot of information, but happy to take any questions.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you for your presentation. Are there any questions from committee members?

Senator Issenator

Is there any way to run both simulations or run both at the same time? In other words, keep where it would have been with the one star, but keep in place rules that would show the more equal distribution or general distribution? of the star ratings and where the schools align for potential for raising the bar in the future.

Chair Brenner, make sure I understand that correctly. So again, what we tried to do is simulate, again, where we were versus what we could anticipate. Again, I think what we could do is moving forward. We don't have all this year's data yet. We could run both those numbers. I would argue that it's a substantially different measure. I mean, what that third piece is not, you know, when the third grade reading guarantee was in place, we were looking at, you know, how many students were being promoted. That is, you know, based on changes to that particular law, that's not really in place anymore. So it's really measuring two different things. And so I think, you know, as a starting spot, this is a fair starting spot, but at the same time, we want to make sure that we're having high expectations. You know, so you don't want to have a situation where basically everybody tanks on this, But we want to make sure that we're adjusting that moving forward. So we want to continue, for example, to have data to look at this in different ways and maybe even potentially a few years down the road update that rule if necessary.

Senator Issenator

Well, I guess the question I have for you is how can this data be used to help improve student performance?

Chair Benner, I think, again, what we would encourage schools and districts and communities to do, this is report card data that will come out in September. Similar to all the data on the report card, digging in to sort of understand where are the strengths and where are the challenges. If you're a school building, and again, based on this data, there are going to be lots of schools and buildings who have a lot of work to do. Digging into that data and understanding why, because again, this is connected to performance on third grade. It's connected to that diagnostic data that happens in the fall, which then triggers reading improvement and monitoring plans. So if districts and schools are struggling in certain areas, are those interventions that are laid out in the REMPs working and reflecting on that? And I think that really, and again, that sort of segues into all the work on literacy to make sure that, okay, we're doing the right things about implementing the science of reading. We're making sure that those individual plans are effective. And if, in fact, things need to be changed at an individual level, it should be reflecting on that data.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

All right. Seeing no other questions for you, Chris, thank you very much for your presentation. And then we have, it looks like, Dr. Melissa Mayer-Mayer. I mispronounced your last name. I apologize, Weber-Mayer. Welcome to the committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayorother

Thank you. Good afternoon, Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram. I am Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayor, there you go, Chief Academic Officer for the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce, and I appreciate the opportunity to present to you today Ohio's updated learning standards for English language arts and social studies, as well as an integrated model curriculum that integrates social studies and English language arts. All right, so I'm going to start with the social studies standards, and this slide is just a reminder that the last time these were adopted were in February of 2018. So it is due, it is timely, and we have done some work. The next slide moves into what we've done as far as strengthening the social studies standards for K through 8, grades kindergarten through 8. We have made more connections to Ohio period to expand students knowledge of Ohio history So currently in those 2017 standards Ohio history fell in fourth grade and so it kind of all fell on the fourth grade teacher to teach all Ohio history. We've now embedded Ohio history starting in kindergarten and going past the fourth grade all the way to eighth grade. We've also elevated civic skills and more opportunities to learn about founding documents. We've made connections to the science of reading through stronger alignment of social studies and literacy skills, so the importance of vocabulary and background knowledge when learning social studies content. And then we worked to streamline the standards. So one feedback from the educators were that there were too many social studies standards and it was too hard to teach them all in one year in the grade bands. So we deleted those that were redundant. The timeline that we went through was we started last summer, in summer of 2025, reviewing those current standards one by one. We gather teachers and educators together and experts to work on the K-8, not rewriting, strengthening of those standards. In winter, we held focus groups and feedback surveys, put out feedback surveys and got public comment on the social studies standards drafts. And in spring, we've used that feedback to update those standards and bring them forth to you today. So the social studies feedback that we received from educators included positives and then also areas that we could improve based on the draft that was presented to the public. The positives were clear and concise content knowledge and skill development. They liked the Ohio history connection starting in kindergarten and continuing on. Civics engagement opportunities were also a plus. And then the vertical articulation of skills across the grade levels, the educators could see how first grade skills built on kindergarten skills, second grade, third grade, fourth grade, all the way up. The improvements that suggestions that they made to the department team was to clarify the clarity of to still further clarify skills and content statements, to connect students to Ohio history outside of the classroom, so not just inside the classroom through the standards, but outside, and to better integrate with literacy given all the work that's been done with literacy over the last three years and the requirements around curriculum materials, et cetera. So the next slide in the document that you have, I believe, is a color-coded document of the changes to the standards. And the keys are, the yellow are where we have changed. The content remained unchanged, but we clarified language. The red, the content still remained unchanged, but we made more significant language changes. And the green are new standards that were added. So this slide just shows you an example from grade one, grade three, and grade eight. It's not the same standard. It's different. But how that looks when we were talking about content unchanged but significant language change in the first. So where in 2018, the standard for grade one was talking about responsibility to take action towards achievement of common goals in homeschools and community. The updated language reflects positive citizenship qualities that includes individuals making responsible choices, being accountable for their actions, and respecting the rights of others. In grade three once the standard read local communities change over time which was very broad so we changed that to give the Ohio focus or actually we added that and added a standard to focus on Ohio Local communities have challenges and opportunities that are shaped by their history And then in the final column there for grade 8 is an example of where we clarified language there in the top and made some significant change in the bottom by adding a specific Northwest Ordinance there to be more specific for educators. So with that, I'm going to move to the ELA standards update. And again, here's the cover of the current ELA standards, and they were adopted in February of 2017. So given all of the work that we've done across Ohio with the science of reading and the passing of the dyslexia laws, we know that it was time to revise and strengthen these standards as well to reflect those changes. So, okay, here we go. The significant changes in literacy instruction through all of the ReadOhio initiatives inform the changes here. We aligned the standards with the expectations for high-quality instructional materials. So all of our districts across Ohio are required to use high-quality instructional materials that are aligned to Ohio standards. Those were reviewed to align to standards, and now our standards are even stronger to reflect the high-quality instructional materials. We also added writing foundations through kindergarten through grade 8 and the basics of handwriting and spelling. The timeline for this looked very similar to our social studies updates. Summer of 2025, we reviewed standard by standard, except with the ELA standards, we broke them into chunks. So in the fall, we worked on the K-2 revisions with educator input, focus groups, and survey feedback. In the winter, we did grades 3 through 8 revisions with educator focus groups, feedback, and input. And then spring, we are here sharing with you the final draft of those versions. For the English language arts standards, the feedback positive were they really liked the clarity and handwriting standards. The vertical articulation of skills and contents across grade level were more clear. And the alignment to science of reading was much appreciated and reflected within the standards. Improvement from our educators were the alignment of reading foundations and writing foundations across K-5. They wanted to see those foundational skills extend through grade 8. And therefore, we met that with them. We looked at that.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

And knowing that we have children in, let's see, this year, they would have been in 6th grade, all the way in 6th grade, so teachers in 4th grade, 5th grade, 6th grade, writing reading improvement monitoring plans for any child that was not proficient in reading at third grade, and next year we'll have seventh grade teachers that will be writing those. So we've embedded more of the foundational skills for teaching reading, which would be phonics, phonemic awareness, advanced phonics, through those upper grades to ensure that teachers have those knowledge and skills and see that progression within the standards. We also were asked to increase the rigor to match expectations for high-quality instructional materials. So we were very happy to hear from our educators that their high-quality instructional materials, they are paying attention to what is in there, and they are looking at the standards and looking for that alignment. So this slide is an example, again, same color code, same key, of content unchanged but clarified language is yellow, content unchanged but significant language change is red, and green is a new standard added. So here I point out in grade 7 this is where you can see those foundational skills were added where they did not exist before where we are being explicit and putting a standard in of decoding words by applying morphological analysis or awareness which is breaking down into small chunks of meaning rather than the sounds and then word recognition, the etymology, which is where words come from, what language they come from, including roots, prefixes, and suffixes, which you probably all remember learning at some point, the Latin and Greek roots of things. And so now what I'd like to do is just give you a quick overview of the integrated model curriculum that we have published and had some teachers pilot for us and continue to give us feedback on how do you embed more of the social studies content and background knowledge within the English language arts block. So we have developed Ohio's integrated model curriculum, and thank you. Also, this was passed in the last budget to work to enhance more background knowledge building of Ohio history civics into daily teaching. So this model curriculum invests in Ohio students by strengthening learning through meaningful connections to their state and local community. So rather than all big picture, we're honing in on what does it mean to be an Ohioan. Complements the high-quality instructional materials. So we currently have 27 curriculum materials on our core list for English language arts that include knowledge-building content, and that means it includes science and social studies content already. But many of our districts are still piecing curriculum materials together, like a phonics material with something else, that may not have that content-rich vocabulary in there, so we're providing an opportunity to have that. The use of high-quality evidence-based instructional practices and technologies to promote positive outcomes for all learners, and then increase students' access to social studies content in general and skill development. This timeline very much matched everything else. In the summer was when, summer of 2025 is when House Bill 96 enrolled this into law of the integrated model curriculum. We worked in the fall to develop and draft materials. We've had educators piloting them all this school year and giving us feedback in kindergarten through grade 8 on how to strengthen those, if it's too much, if it's too little, et cetera. In winter, we released and did a presentation at the New Perspectives on Northwest Ordinance Conference. And then spring, we did public comments and surveys. And we're bringing this document to you today as well. So the Ohio Integrated Model Curriculum is really a set of 11 source sets. and source sets are just a selection of materials, authentic text, Ohio specific, aligned to the standards for teachers to use every day in their teaching. And so this just gives you a list of what some of the 11 source sets and what those are. All right, and I think that's... Very good. Thank you for that. Any questions from the committee? Seeing none, you're getting off easy. Okay, thank you. Thank you for that. All right. So we will go to, we'll call Substitute House Bill 25 up for its second hearing.

Miss Portsmouthother

And Takesha Boone with the Junior League of Columbus. Good afternoon. My name is Takesha Boone and on the docket also is my daughter Janae Boone. Janae had six fillings this morning. She's not feeling well. So I brought in one of my heavy hitters, Faith Claypool, Miss Portsmouth with the Miss America organization. organization, so she's going to speak on behalf of Janae when we get to that place. Also brought one of my foster kiddos, Priya Guzmier. You might have seen her give testimony before while it was on the House side. Priya's here as well to make sure that if you have any questions, we can answer those. You'll hear from some of my other friends as well, Brianna Booker and Julia Moreno. But Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram and members of the Senate Education Committee, thank you for the opportunity to offer proponent testimony on Substitute House Bill 25, the Fostering School Success Act. My name is Keisha Boone, as I mentioned earlier, and I am a foster care mom. I'm also the advocacy coordinator for the Junior League of Columbus. Through our program, Bridging the Gap, G-A-P, we guide, we advocate, and we provide for children in foster care, and those that are transitioning into adulthood. Over the past several months, I have been one of the organizers of our Fostering Potential Lecture Series. You may have seen it. It's on YouTube, and it's co-hosted by Action Ohio, the Children's Defense Fund Ohio, and the Junior League of Columbus. The series has done what House Bill 25 is asking Ohio to do. It brings forward youth voice. It brings schools, child welfare partners, and policymakers together to the same table to serve students in foster care. Across five sessions, the Fostering Potential Lecture Series, we have had 235 total registrations, 96 unique attendees, and more than 230 total YouTube views. Maybe you think that's small compared to your social media followers, but we're excited. We share these numbers because they show that people across Ohio really care about this issue. They want to learn from the best practices they can implement in their own communities, and they want to see policy change. The most important lessons have come from young people themselves. One of our foster alumni told us that she attended more than seven or eight high schools during her time in care. She left schools just before graduation the moment she aged out because she was missing more than half of the credits that she needed to graduate. In some placements, she waited 30 days and sometimes three months before school began again. She told us that she loved learning. She really did. But it was really discouraging when you fall behind, further and further behind, after each placement change with different foster families. She's now working towards her GED. Another young person switched schools mid-year and missed almost an entire geometry unit. No adult asked her, what are you working on? What do you need to stay on track? She nearly failed her sophomore year. She has since created videos explaining why foster students need trained adults in schools to help them navigate. Another student who learned about sudden school placement just before the end of the school year, went to each teacher and asked what he had to do to pass before leaving the next day. That burden should not fall on a child. Another alumni attended nine high schools, graduated with a 3.3 GPA, and later founded her own nonprofit. Her motto is simple. The system is not broken. It's disconnected. For students in foster care school can be the one steady place left for them The counselors who feel like family the teachers who know the child can succeed the IEP program team that understands a disability, the siblings in the same building, even when siblings live apart, or a friend group that makes a child want to show up for school. House Bill 25 names the adults responsible for protecting those lifelines. It creates district-level building responsibility. It makes training routine. It turns rights on paper into daily practice. A 10-year-old foster student in our series, one of my foster daughters that I spoke about, told us of dreams that she has to become a nurse. Students like her should not have to depend on luck, geography, or one heroic adult to stay on track. Please pass House Bill 25 soon and champion its inflammation in your own districts. Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you for your testimony. Any questions? Sure, we can do that. I guess up next, Julia Marino. Welcome to committee and you may proceed when ready.

Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayorother

Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram, and members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify in support of Substitute House Bill 25, the Fostering School Success Act. My name is Julia Marino, and I also help with advocacy for the Junior League of Columbus and co-organize the Fostering Potential series, which Keisha mentioned. Across our webinars, I've learned a lesson. Foster youth aren't failed because adults don't care. They're failed when caring adults must work inside systems that do not connect. That's why House Bill 25 matters. For a child in foster care sits between systems. There's child welfare with legal responsibility and urgent safety obligations. And then there's the schools with the more daily knowledge of the student. The teacher who interacts with the student daily. the coach and the team that forms the child support system, and the IEP team that knows what services are working for the child. Too often, we have learned that child welfare and education systems do not coordinate as effectively as they could at a local level. House Bill 25 addresses that problem. It creates clear points of contact before a crisis occurs. It tells adults, don't wait until a student misses weeks of school to exchange contact information and records. We need to remember that for many foster youth, school is a rare place which is still stable for them. I met a teenager who's especially close to her brother who has special needs. When he's upset, often only she's the one who can calm him down. But when she moved to a new placement and a new school, the loss was not only academic. It meant losing daily family contact. That's what school stability protects. Learning, services, relationships, and sometimes that only family bond a child still gets to see. One point has really stayed with me from the research, which is that school mobility ranks above poverty as a predictor of high school graduation. And we can see why. How is a young person supposed to graduate after four, five, six, or nine school moves? Keeping students in their school of origin when it in their best interest gives them the chance they need to stay on track It helps teachers counselors caseworkers and caregivers coordinate to make sure the child best interests are kept front and center. This bill has been through serious work, including seven House hearings, agency input, DCY and DEW expert testimony, proponent testimony, and many interested party meetings. After numerous iterations, it became the school stability bill before you. The House passed it in early March by a margin of 93 to 2. I understand that the legislative process takes time, but I feel these students do not have years to wait. With the summer approaching, they need these supports in the fall of 2026, not in 2027 or 2028. I respectfully ask this committee to report Substitute House Bill 25 favorably and help move it to the Senate floor for prompt passage. Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you for your testimony. Up next would be Julia Marino. Oh, wait a minute, that was you. Janae Boone. Welcome to the committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Faith Claypoolother

Chair Binner, Vice Chair Blessing, and Ranking Member Ingram, And the members of the Education Committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify in support of substitute House Bill 25, the Fostering School Success Act. My name is Faith Claypool. I am the current representative for Portsmouth, Ohio, in the upcoming Miss Ohio Scholarship Program. I am also the advocate and founder of Foster the Future, Be the Change in America's foster care system. As well as being an educator, I think the most important thing about me that you should know is that I have been a big sister to well over 60 cases that have come within my home growing up in a foster home. Today I'm testifying on behalf of Janae Boone. Janae Boone is a foster sister, a high school sophomore at Worthington Christian High School. The stakes are measurable. In 2022 to 2023, public high school students in foster care graduated on time nationally at 57.5%, compared with 86.7% for all students. In Ohio, the rate was 61% compared with the 86.2% for all students. Those gaps are not just educational statistics. To me, they are about whether students have steady adults, steady schools, and steady support when life is already unstable. They connect to homelessness, economic insecurity, and public assistance and justice system involvement. They show that systems have not provided steady support early enough. Federal law already recognizes that foster student education stability is a two-way system problem. In 2008, the Fostering Connections Act placed school stability duties on child welfare agencies. Case plans must address educational stability measurements placements and consider the child current school and agencies to coordinate with schools Then the ESSA signed in 2015 and implemented for those for these purposes in 2016 placed duties on the education side Schools must collaborate with child welfare partners, protect school of origin stability, enroll students immediately when a school change is necessary, move records quickly, identify points of contact and arrange transportation procedures. That structure matters because of child welfare. This makes it urgent placement decisions while schools hold daily educational knowledge, credits, IEPs, attendants, teachers, counselors, peer relationships, and activities. A child needs both systems to stay in the room. The federal law did not create a full implementation structure. the Government Accountability Office found major barriers, staff turnover, transportation challenges, cost questions, information sharing needs, point of contact challenges, and scattered technical assistance. In other words, the legal rights exist, but implementation has been a challenge. For homeless students, McKinney-Vento predictions can show us what happens when law creates clearer infrastructure. state coordinators, local liaisons, school of origin protections, immediate enrollment, transportation rules, dispute resolution procedures, monitoring and technical assistance. Schools know what to do. It should not be easier for the same young person to receive reliable service when identified as homeless than when identified as a student in foster care. Other states have responded by making federal protections more concrete in state law, and we would be happy to provide a list of peer states that have enhanced laws similar to House Bill 28, or House Bill 25, excuse me, House Bill 25 would do the same for Ohio. It makes existing rights visible, local, and more likely to reach the child. No student should lose credits, services, siblings, or trust because adults do not know whom to call. With summer approaching, these students need support in the fall of 2026, not 2027. Swift passage would give schools, districts, and agencies time to prepare for next year. Please pass House Bill 25 soon and make school stability real for students in foster care. Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you for your testimony today. Up next, we have Lily Zetting from Foster Hearts. Welcome to committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Lily Zettingother

Chair Brenner, Vice Chair, Blessing Ranking Member Ingram, and members of the Senate Education Committee, thank you for the opportunity to offer proponent testimony on Substitute House Bill 25, the Fostering Schools Success Act. My name is Lily Zetting. Seven years ago, I founded Fostering Hearts in honor of my two younger brothers who I was separated from after they entered foster care and I was adopted. Fostering Hearts is a service project I started with my Heaven Sent Mom to help children impacted by foster care feel seen, celebrated, and loved. People call her Brittany, but I call her Mom. My mom adopted me before I entered foster care myself. Because of her and because of my aunt, who has been a foster parent and advocate, I've seen how important caring adults can be in a child's life. Today, through Fostering Hearts, I create birthday bags, fill blessing boxes, create organized socks, drives, and volunteer to help children impacted by foster care. I am here because every child deserves stability, opportunity, and hope. I know children in foster care personally, and I have seen how difficult it can be when everything changes at once. I have two younger brothers who entered foster care and were placed in two separate homes. I have not seen them in more than six years. Also, I know children who have moved from home to home and school to school. Some lost teachers they trusted, friends they loved, sports teams they belonged to, and activities that helped them feel normal during hard times. When a child enters foster care so much, it's already uncertain. School should be the place that stays steady. School is more than classes. It is relationships, routines, teachers who believe in you, counselors who help you, and friends who make you feel like you belong. That is why House Bill 25 matters. When children lose those connections, it can make them feel overwhelmed, discouraged, and alone. This bill helps make sure there are people in schools whose job is to support students in foster care, help schools and agencies work together, and make sure children do not fall through cracks and placement change. Most importantly, it helps create consistency for children. and during some of the most difficult times in their life, children in foster care already face enough challenges. They should not have to worry about losing their education too. I'm grateful that Ohio is taking steps to better support these students and help them succeed not only in school but in life. I was lucky because I was adopted into a loving family. Not every child gets that outcome, but every child should have the chance to succeed in school. I respectfully ask you to support House Bill 25 and vote yes. Thank you for your time and for caring about Ohio's children. Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you for your testimony. And then I have also Breonna Booker from Ohio, of the Children's Defense Fund Ohio. Welcome to committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Brianna Bookerother

Good afternoon, Chair Brenner, Vice Chair, Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram and members of the committee. Thank you so much for the opportunity to testify today in support of substitute House Bill 25. Before I begin, I have distributed a fact sheet about foster youth in schools that just gives some more information about the necessity of this bill. I apologize. I forgot to attach it to my testimony. But my name is Brianna Booker, and I am the Policy Associate for the Children's Defense Fund of Ohio, a statewide multi-issue child advocacy organization that has worked in this state for 45 years. We always say that our mission is to build community so that children grow up with dignity, with hope, and with joy. And we firmly believe that school stability is a foundational part of that vision, particularly for young people in foster care. A question we often heard in conversations about House Bill 25 and in our advocacy see is whether these supports already exist And the short answer is yes however only in some places and often inconsistently And so we know that where strong support systems exist, they deserve recognition and replication. However, too often in the state of Ohio, many students still experience gaps in support. And when those gaps appear, young people can and do fall through the cracks, as you can see in that fact sheet that I presented. And that uneven access is precisely why House Bill 25 is necessary. Hamilton County offers us a clear example of what is possible when systems are intentionally aligned as House Bill 25 would make it. So over the past two decades, that county has built a strong cross-sector partnership connecting child welfare, schools, juvenile court, legal aid, and other community partners. Through the Kids in School Rule Program, they have established consistent practices to support foster youth stability, including designated liaisons, child welfare education specialists, data sharing agreements, best interest determinations, and really coordinated transportation and other services. And the results of that speaks for itself. In the 2024 to 2025 school year, Hamilton County completed 922 best interest determinations and served over 600 students across Cincinnati Public, Northwest, and Wintonwood schools. Within Cincinnati Public Schools, seniors participating in the Kids in School Rule program graduated at a rate of 97%. House Bill 25 takes the lessons learned in places like Hamilton County and scales them statewide, ensuring that every district and every child, every school building, has someone who knows what to do and how to act when a student in foster care needs support. As you've heard from my colleagues, this need is echoed in our Fostering Potential series, which has highlighted challenges with school stability across the state. An example of that is an educational administrator from another Ohio community describing what he called a major epidemic in care, pointing to more than 100 group homes in his area, a single high school serving over 200 students connected to care, and court or court involvement, and young people being dropped off without any real support or resources. Members of the committee, this bill is extremely necessary. not only because of that, but also because it serves as a public safety measure. As you've heard, foster youth are more likely to experience homelessness and become involved in our juvenile justice system. And when foster youth experience repeated school disruptions, they become more likely to be disconnected from school and the support of adults who help keep them on track. This concern is consistent with findings from both the Annie E. Casey Foundation in 2024, which highlighted how educational instability significantly increased risk factors tied to system involvement, and the Juvenile Law Center, which documented the link between school disruption, reduced engagement, and deeper justice system involvement for foster youth. So by promoting school stability, strengthening adult support systems, and connecting students to the services they need, House Bill 25 helps reduce the conditions that can lead to not only juvenile justice involvement, but also help foster youth more generally and increase the opportunities there are to help them thrive. And so lastly I just want to state that we stand in full support of House Bill 25 in its current form and we truly appreciate the progress it represents But at the same time I still want to note and be extremely clear that the key elements from the original proposal particularly the scholarship provisions for foster youth as outlined in Senate Bill 13 are still essential and should still be considered by this General Assembly. And so with that, thank you so much, and I welcome any questions at this time.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

All right. Well, when everybody gets up here, are there any questions from committee members? Ranking Member Ingram.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Excuse me. I actually don't have a question. I just want to say thank you, each of you, for coming in and your testimony. We appreciate that. It makes a difference. Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Any other questions from committee members?

Senator Issenator

I'll say the same thing. Your testimony was very good, so I do appreciate everybody coming in today. So thank you very much. Thank you. It's important to us. Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

To the members, we do have some written-only testimony as well on the iPads. With that, that will conclude the second hearing on House Bill 25. Up next will be House Bill 125 for its fifth hearing, and we do have some proponent testimony provided by Grace Martin, National FFA. Welcome to committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Grace Martinother

Good afternoon, Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram, and members of the Senate Education Committee. My name is Grace Martin, and I am a current student at the Amanda Clear Creek High School. Today, I am here to speak in favor of House Bill 125. I believe that this House Bill will be beneficial to the thousands of students who participate in FFA and 4-H programs. These organizations provide opportunities that often extend beyond the traditional classroom setting. However, many students are still penalized for participating in these activities, as the absences can negatively affect their attendance records and, in some cases, their grades. House Bill 125 would help ensure that students are not unfairly disadvantaged while engaging in educational experiences that contribute to their personal and professional development. As an officer and active member of my FFA chapter, I have seen firsthand why this legislation is needed. Through FFA, members are able to go to leadership conferences, conventions, competitions, and many other ag-related experiences. These include national and state FFA convention, machinery shows, and career development events. National FFA convention is a great opportunity for students to meet with FFA members from all over the country and foster meaningful connections. Through its leadership workshops and powerful keynote speakers, national convention has enhanced my leadership skills and strengthened my ability to connect with my community. However, this experience does cause me to miss several days of school every year. And although my school district excuses these days, I know not every school does. I believe that National Convention is a great experience that everyone should have the opportunity to attend, without the fear of being penalized. Another part of FFA that has had a strong impact on my life are the career development events, also known as CDEs. CDEs not only prepare students for their future but also allow them to explore an agricultural related industry before college Students can participate in CDE contests such as veterinary science wildlife management farm business management and many other agricultural careers The CDE that has had the biggest impact on my life is the Agricultural Issues Forum. In this contest, a team of four to seven members give a 15-minute debate-style presentation over an agricultural-related topic. This contest has not only strengthened my confidence, but also taught me what hard work and dedication truly are. Through this contest, our team had to miss school to give our presentation to people such as the Ohio Soybean Council, Ohio House Rep Kevin Miller, and Ohio Senator Tim Schaefer. My team also got the opportunity to compete at the Big E regional competition in West Springfield, Massachusetts. I also got the opportunity to advocate for agricultural education and career tech on a federal level in Washington, D.C. While there, I got to speak to Ohio Senator John Husted and multiple congressmen and women over how FFA has impacted my life. Opportunities such as these would not have been possible if learning was confined to our classroom. Real-world lessons sometimes cannot be taught in a classroom, but instead have to be experienced. Allowing opportunities like the ones I have shared to not penalize students will truly benefit FFA and 4-H members for the better. By voting for House Bill 125, you will help ensure that students are recognized and supported for learning experiences that extend beyond the classroom. I would like to thank you for your time and for allowing me to speak on a topic that has impacted my life so heavily. Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you for your testimony. Are there any questions from committee members? Seeing none, thank you for your testimony today. Thank you. Up next is Samantha Buckley, National FFA.

Vice Presidentother

Welcome to committee, and you may proceed when ready. Good afternoon, Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram, and members of the Senate Education Committee. My name is Samantha Buckley, and I am Vice President of the Amanda Clear Creek FFA Chapter. I am here to testify in favor of House Bill 125 and share my experiences in FFA. In addition to FFA, I participate in multiple other activities, including band, sports, student

Miss Portsmouthother

council, and 4-H. FFA, however, has been one of the most influential and meaningful organizations that I have been a part of. It has taught me leadership, hard work, and dedication. Part of our chapter's activities include many out-of-school and out-of-state trips. These can range from industry tours to leadership conventions, as well as career development event contests. During my time in FFA, I've been to national and state FFA conventions, various leadership conferences, multiple farm and factory tours, and agricultural machinery shows. They've given me countless skills that I would not have had if it were for being taken out of school to experience them. I've learned how to connect and talk with strangers and form new relationships that are separate from my cool peers. This is a very important life skill that I am now equipped with thanks to FFA. I've learned about leadership and networking through the multiple conferences I've been to. I also get an inside look into how factories, farms, and other industries work by going on tours. These experiences have shown me what really goes into production and manufacturing so that I can more accurately choose a career that will fit my interests. In addition to those, I participate in multiple career development events that have shown me the ins and outs of career pathways that I am interested in. Some of these include agricultural communication, agricultural sales, aquarium management, and livestock judging. These have given me both job skills as well as hands-on knowledge that I will use in my future career. I have also been to multiple shows that display the latest technology in agriculture. I have seen massive combines, drones, and planters that I would not have seen otherwise. This showed me the technological and engineering side of things, which expanded my understanding of all that goes into the agricultural field. Going to all of these diverse events have given me experiences and knowledge that are not easily attained in the classroom. While I understand the importance of attendance and engagement in academic activities, I know firsthand the integral aspect that these experiences have played in the development of myself as a future leader. Overall, FFA and out-of-school trips have led me to become a better leader and person. while also broadening my horizon and perspective for my future. This is why I am in support of House Bill 125. Thank you, and I'm open to any questions about my experiences.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you very much for your testimony. Any questions from committee members?

Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayorother

I have a question. How many days would you say you missed school in order to attend FFA events in a school year?

Miss Portsmouthother

Yeah, so for me personally, including National Convention, State Convention, the National Farm Machinery Show, and the Farm Science Review, I would probably say around seven, probably ten at the max, depending. It also depends for each FFA member, depending on how much they participate in. So the National Convention and State Convention are both optional trips, but if you choose to attend, that's about two days out for State Convention and probably three for National Convention.

Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayorother

And I assume if you go to the Farm Science Review, you're going there in the morning and then the buses leave around 2 or something.

Miss Portsmouthother

Yeah, so that's just a single day.

Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayorother

And then you're there the whole day going and visiting the various crop exhibits and then all the various events that are going on there, I assume.

Miss Portsmouthother

Yes.

Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayorother

Okay. The reason I ask that question is we're contemplating putting a day restriction on how many days would be excused or allowed. Would you say that for your FFA you would be, like at the Farm Science Review or going to the National Convention,

Miss Portsmouthother

it is a learning day for the most part, the whole day? Of course, yes. So when we attend the Farm Science Review, we have to attend multiple lectures and stuff and demonstrations where we'll write notes and take notes so that we display our new learnings and understandings of agricultural techniques.

Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayorother

All right.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Well, thank you very much for your questions and testimony today. Thank you Up next is Bella Metz Welcome to committee and you may proceed when ready Good afternoon Chair Brenner Vice Chair Blessing Ranking Member Ingram and members of the Senate

Bella Metzother

Education Committee. And thank you all for allowing me to come and speak today about something that I am truly passionate about. My name is Bella Metz and I am an incoming junior at Amanda Clear Creek High School, where I am heavily involved with our school's FFA chapter. Today, I am here to discuss House Bill 125 and how it impacts FFA members like myself. FFA has had such a significant impact on my life. The experiences that I have been offered through the program goes far beyond what I learn in the regular classroom setting. Without FFA, I truly don't believe that I would be where I am today standing and speaking in front of all of you. I have gained several key leadership skills and have had a substantial amount of personal growth due to my involvement in the FFA program. Through the trips that are offered, such as state and national level conventions, where FFA members come together to celebrate what they all love, all the way to the several career development opportunities offered, there is a special place for everyone in the program, no matter their background. FFA allows for both personal and professional growth and success in every member. This program has allowed me to meet amazing people from all around the state of Ohio and our country, forming lifelong friendships with those who share the same interest as myself. At the high school level, it is known that some kids struggle with finding where they fit in. With FFA, there are opportunities for every member to find something that they excel in and truly strive to do, while working alongside others that have the same interests. During my time in FFA, I've had several once-in-a-lifetime opportunities that have truly shaped my life, such as traveling to Boston, Massachusetts with my Agricultural Issues Forum CDE team to compete in the regional contest. This allowed for me to develop public speaking skills and talk to people around our region about how agriculture is directly impacting them. Whether it's missing school to attend conventions where I'm able to listen to keynote speakers teaching us members how to become better individuals, or being able to talk to Ohio leaders such as our very own Ohio Senator Tim Schaefer and Ohio Representative Kevin Miller, I believe that these opportunities heavily exceed what we do in a regular classroom setting. It can be easy to make up for some missed schoolwork, but it is certainly not easy to miss out on these life-changing experiences that shape us young individuals. I am honored to be a member of the Amanda Clear Creek Ohio and National FFA organization. FFA has truly shaped me into a very confident and ambitious young woman, and I am beyond blessed to be here today and discuss that with all of you. I strongly encourage you all to vote in favor of House Bill 125, as it will allow for members like me and my peers here today to continue advocating for agriculture and FFA at many levels. Thank you for your time.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you very much for your testimony today. Any questions from committee members? Ranking Member Ingram.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

I guess maybe thanks, Mr. Chair. Just to piggyback, thank you so much for being here, and you're waiting so patiently to testify. Good thing it's June the 2nd. Do you believe that there should be a cap on the number of days that a student should be able to take in regard to conventions or other events whether it be in or out

Bella Metzother

And remember, those days go along with every other day, the holidays and things of that nature.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Do you think there should be a cap at all?

Bella Metzother

I think it can get to a certain point that it's a lot of days, but I truly do think that missing school for FFA events, like these conventions and everything that I talked about, is a great learning experience and it definitely goes beyond what people learn in a classroom and allows people to get hands-on experiences about FFA and agriculture and it definitely allows for us young high school age kids to learn more and be more involved with our community.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Okay. Do you get at the end of it, I believe my nieces, they just graduated, they both were in FFA. One of them got an FFA degree. Can you explain what that is?

Bella Metzother

I'm assuming it was the Ohio State FFA degree. Yeah, I believe it is. Yes. So there's a lot of degrees that FFA has. So first is greenhand, and then there's chapter degree, state degree, which is the highest that Ohio has. And then there's the American degree. So you get your greenhand degree normally during your freshman year, and then your chapter degree during your sophomore year of high school. And then regularly people tend to get their state degree during their junior or senior years or one year after their graduation. and there's a lot of hard work. Only 2% of Ohio FFA members earn their state degree as of 2026. And there's just a lot of work put into getting the state degree. You have to meet several requirements that you can find in the FFA handbook. And then you also have to have an SAE, which is a supervised agricultural experience. And then you have to document all of that into AET, which is your agricultural education tracker. and it allows for everybody to see what all you're doing in your agricultural-related field and how you understand FFA and agriculture and how it works. Okay, well, that answers that. Thank you very much.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

I'm trying to contemplate whether or not this should be classified as education and therefore not disrupting the school and trying to figure out how we can maybe adjust that so it isn't an excused or unexcused absence that's just considered part of your schoolwork. So I thank you very much for your testimony today.

Bella Metzother

Thank you, guys.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

And I also have a Hannah Psalm. Welcome to committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Hannah Psalmother

Good afternoon, Chair Brenner, Vice Chair Blessing, Ranking Member Ingram, and members of the Senate Education Committee. My name is Hannah Psalm, and I am here today to speak in favor of House Bill 125. I graduated from Amanda Clerk Creek High School in Fairfield County back in 2023. Throughout my time in the education system, I had the opportunity to participate in a variety of co- and extracurricular activities that have greatly developed me into the young woman that I have become today. I was an active 4-H member, a varsity cheerleader, band member, part of the National Honor Society, and FFA member, to name a few of those organizations that had the most impact on my life. One of the most monumental, though, was my time in FFA. At the end of my junior year of high school, I was elected to serve as the 2022-2023 Ohio FFA State Vice President. While I was incredibly excited for this opportunity, it did create a new challenge, completing my high school education while also working to serve the then 28,000 FFA members across the state. My duties required me to travel around Ohio to host leadership workshops throughout the school day for our members. Thankfully I had great support from Amanda Clear Creek and was able to fulfill these duties but House Bill 125 would have enhanced that experience even more for me I fully recognize not every student in Ohio will be elected to serve for state office, but there are numerous other activities within our organization that are beneficial for our students to attend. Two of those events include the national and state FFA conventions. Both of these events are held during the school year and often cause students to miss around five to six total days of school. Conventions are incredibly important for all students because they highlight opportunities that otherwise might go unnoticed. Not only do they honor award recipients, they also have college and career fairs, leadership workshops, and even announce student workforce opportunities. Many students, including myself, decided their next steps in life because of what they were able to experience at those events. Because of the experiences I had in FFA, I decided I wanted to pursue a career in agriculture, and when it came time to choose a school, I knew I wanted to leave Ohio to see what other opportunities awaited me. As many of you may know, though, out-of-state tuition is a large barrier preventing many students from attending their dream schools. However, I found many schools greatly valued the education I was able to receive outside of the classroom and offered me scholarships because of it. I ultimately decided to attend Texas A&M University and study animal science. After my first semester there, I was granted in-state tuition and additional scholarships specifically because of my time in FFA. These scholarship dollars have now totaled up to over $100,000 in my three years at Texas A&M. If it wasn't for my time and the organizations previously mentioned, this would have never happened. I strongly encourage you to consider the things you have learned outside the walls of a classroom. As many of us reflect, we might agree you tend to learn more when you are experiencing something, not just hearing about it. Whether that be how we raise crops and livestock, how to weld, or even how to grocery shop and plan a large meal, these are all things I was able to learn with the support of my agricultural educators, yet not within the confines of a traditional classroom. I would like to greatly thank you for the opportunity to share my story here today and strongly encourage you to vote in favor of House Bill 125 for the endless pathways it opens for Ohio students. Thank you, and I'm happy to answer any questions that you might have.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Well, thank you very much, Hannah, for your testimony. Are there any questions from committee members? Seeing none, obviously you've benefited tremendously for this, and you've gone on and are becoming successful because of FFA. So thank you very much for that testimony on that today.

Hannah Psalmother

Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you. Up next is Evan Calico from the Ohio Farm Bureau. Welcome to committee, and you may proceed when ready.

Ohio Farmother

Thank you, Chair Brenner, Ranking Member Ingram, other members of the Senate Education Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to provide proponent testimony for House Bill 125. My name is Evan Calico, and I'm proud to serve as the Director of State Policy for the Ohio Farm Bureau. The Ohio Farm Bureau has long supported FFA and 4-H's vital programs for agricultural education and workhorse development. I am also here representing the Ohio Association of Agricultural Educators, which represents our ag teachers and FFA advisors across the state. House Bill 125 will give students in both 4-H and FFA further opportunities to develop essential skills that allow them to be a vital part of Ohio's number one industry. FFA and 4-H have long provided students with a wealth of activities and experiences that help them learn life skills and develop essential leadership abilities. One such opportunity, specifically in FFA, is a supervised agricultural experience, or SAE. This is a part of the three-component model of agricultural education, with the other two opponents being classroom and lab instruction and engagement in various FFA activities such as contests and conventions. An SAE is experiential learning, either through service or work-based learning. These experiences can come in many forms, such as working in a local hardware store, starting a lawn care business, or like I did, beginning a livestock operation. My SAE involved managing a 100-head beef cattle herd that I owned and operated in partnership with my father. This business not only helped me raise money for my college education, but also taught me many essential life skills that prepared me for the workforce, including responsibility, time management, and accountability, just to name a few. However, an all-too-common problem is that these experiences often require a significant amount of time inside and outside of school. Students work diligently to balance these responsibilities, but sometimes events do arise during the school day. While some schools allow students to have excuse absences for these events, many do not. Consequently, students may miss valuable opportunities to expand their knowledge or engage in business activities and, in unfortunate cases, be penalized for a missing school. Students should not face penalties for striving to develop themselves as individuals through leadership organizations like FFA, 4-H, and as future contributors to our workforce. Under this bill, the students would be counted as present when participating in workforce preparation activities, which the bill does include 4-H and FFA, but it does include other, as the bill says, workforce preparation activities, such as internships, job shadowing, and other activities that would be approved by their individual school district. Counting students as present ensures that they will not be penalized for participating in activities that will help them become an integral part of our future workforce. As long as the students are in good academic and behavioral standing and not missing state testing, they should be able to build their futures without fear of penalization. We should welcome and celebrate every chance we can give our young people to prepare for the workforce. I know I've said this to the committee before, but I would not be standing in front of you today if it were not for career tech education and more specifically FFA and my career tech educators. My FFA advisor was the first one who taught me how to write a speech, how to weld, how to market a product, and how to care for the community I live in. They prepared me not only for my career, but to also be a better person in my adult life. This is not an uncommon story you would hear from students involved in ag. You just heard from four of them. All four of them were taught by the same man, and he is sitting here today, and he's one of the best FFA teachers we have in the state. And it's those people that I truly think deserve a lot of thanks for providing those opportunities to those students. But that's not involved with the bill, so sorry. Ohio Farm Bureau and OAE would like to thank Representatives Creech and Hall for introducing the legislation which will benefit great organizations like FFA and 4-H and prepare our students to be future leaders in their workforce. Thank you again for the opportunity to submit testimony.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

I'd be happy to answer any questions. Thank you for your testimony today. Are there any questions from committee members I have a question for you as I was just chatting with the ranking member both FFA and 4 are used towards other career readiness seals

Dr. Melissa Weber-Mayorother

What if FFA and 4-H had their own career readiness seals or were part of one? What would your thoughts be towards something like that and then not count it towards days excused?

Ohio Farmother

Through the chair, to the chair, I think that is something we would love to have a conversation about. I don't think we've ever thought about it from that perspective before, because I know you've been asking about a cap. And I think that was why this bill languished in the House for a long time, is they were really debating that cap. And I think they landed on the present as just a way, again, that doesn't penalize the students. But these are, at least in FFA, I can speak more for FFA, these are co-curricular things. Like, they're already trying to do things within the school day. And I think that present just made them feel better and not trying to add to the chronic absenteeism problem. But I think we are more than happy to discuss with the committee what a cap may look like. I don't have a number for you today, but I understand why you guys are asking about that. We want to make sure that we're not taking kids out of school if they need to be in school. Like I said, the bill, as it stands, if they are not in good educational standing, they're not in good behavioral standing, or they'd be missing state testing, they automatically can't go. So we do not want students that need to be in school, I would say, getting out for these types of purposes.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

All right. We may also reach out to the bill sponsors on that, too. So, yeah, ranking member Ingram.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just a little bit of a follow-up on that. So should the present be with an asterisk?

Ohio Farmother

Through the Chair, I would say, I don't think I have enough information to answer that. I don't know what that asterisk would be. I think we are fine with how it is under the bill, I think, just as present. But, again, if there's things that the committee would like to talk through, we're more than happy to do so.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Yeah, there's a technical issue, I think. Mr. Chair, that present is one thing, and I mean, because as of right now, if a student is out, even if it's an excused absence, and they're out for a concussion from Friday night football, they still are not there. So we have to figure out what that means, especially since it's used as data on the report card. So we'll just be thinking about that. Thank you.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

Thank you. Thank you for your testimony. Up last is Jeff McCutcheon, the Ohio State College of Ag, which I'm going to say since I was the only one that voted against the current version of it in 1993 in undergraduate student government. It is the Ohio State College of Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Sciences, I guess. But go ahead and you may proceed when ready.

Jeff McCutcheonother

Thank you Chair Brenner Vice Chair Blessing Ranking Member Ingram and other members of the committee My name is Jeff McCutcheon I serve as the Interim State 4 Program Leader in the Ohio State University Extension within the College of Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Sciences. Thank you for the opportunity to provide proponent testimony on House Bill 125, which would require school districts to grant excused absences to students in grades K-12 for participation in scheduled 4-H and FFA programs and activities. I offer this testimony on behalf of the college, OSU Extension, and 4-H. Ohio 4-H is part of the nation's largest youth development organization, empowering nearly 6 billion young people across the U.S. with skills they need to lead for a lifetime. While 4-H is now active in all 50 states and more than 80 countries, It was first organized in Ohio in 1902 in Clark County by A.B. Graham, making our state the proud birthplace of 4-H. Over a century later, 4-H in Ohio remains vital to OSU Extension and within the College of Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Sciences at The Ohio State University. Statewide, more than 196,000 youth are actively involved in Ohio 4-H clubs, camps, schools, and after-school programs, working alongside Ohio FFA Association's 30,000-plus members. These programs are supported by thousands of adult volunteers who serve as mentors and educators. Today, Ohio 4-H prepares youth not only in agriculture and natural resources, but also in STEM, leadership, and career readiness, equipping them to contribute meaningfully to Ohio's communities and economy. A highlight for many 4-H youth is the opportunity to exhibit their projects at county fairs. projects that range from showing livestock to also creative writing to stem projects like robotics. Many of these events occur after the start of the school year, with nearly half Ohio's county and independent fairs taking place between mid-August and early October. Without uniform state policy, students who miss school to participate in these educational activities risk being academically penalized. House Bill 125 addresses the challenge by ensuring students are not academically disadvantaged for participating in meaningful scheduled 4 or FFA activities Under the bill students would be excused from school with proper documentation of participation is submitted, and they would be allowed to make up missed coursework without their grades being adversely affected. The bill also contains appropriate guardrails, permitting school administrators to deny a requests if it conflicts with a scheduled state assessment or periods of disciplinary action. We appreciate that this bill has advanced through the House. Consideration was given to ensuring practical flexibility for families and educators in verifying student participation. We look forward to supporting the legislation as it moves through the Senate to provide clear, consistent standards across all Ohio school districts. At its core, 4-H is about growing responsible, engaged young people who are ready to contribute to their communities. House Bill 125 supports that mission. It tells our youth that their hard work matters and the state of Ohio values what they were learning outside the classroom just as much as what they're learning inside it. Thank you for this opportunity to testify today.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

I would be happy to answer any questions. Thank you very much for your testimony today. Are there any questions from committee members? A ranking member, Ingram.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Tell me again, and I saw this somewhere, how many districts have 4-H chapters that are there associated with the school district?

Jeff McCutcheonother

In Ohio, there's only a few that are in school. That are associated with the school.

Ranking Member Catherine Ingramassemblymember

Right.

Jeff McCutcheonother

Right. So the community club model, but in school districts, we've got some around Dayton and Hamilton County. I know those are probably our largest clusters.

Chair Andrew Brennerassemblymember

All right. I see no other questions. We're going to work to make the best better here. So thank you very much for your testimony today. to the members there is additional written testimony on the iPads actually quite a few pieces of proponent testimony in favor of the bill with that that will conclude the second hearing on House Bill 125. Up next is House Bill 500 for its second hearing. There is no testimony provided. With that that will conclude the second hearing on House Bill 500. With nothing else to come before the committee the committee is hereby adjourned.

Source: Ohio Senate Education Committee - 6-2-2026 · June 2, 2026 · Gavelin.ai