Assembly Floor Session

Please join me in today's prayer. Gracious and sovereign God, We thank you for your faithfulness and for the wisdom found in your word Your word says that whatever you speak does not return to you empty but accomplished what it is intended for and brings prosperity. As the rain and snow come down from heaven to water the earth and bring forth growth, we pray that the word spoken and the work done in this chamber but also bear good fruit for the people we serve. Guide us so that our deliberations are thoughtful, our decisions are just and our actions accomplish the purposes of peace, equity, and the common good. Let every effort undertaken here return not empty, but prosper in ways that strengthen our communities and uplift those in need. Let us bring forth with joy and with peace. May division give way to understanding and may hope rise where there has been hardship. Where there are obstacles, bring renewal. Where there is discouragement, bring vision. And where there is conflict, plant wisdom and grace. May our service leave a lasting legacy of integrity, compassion, and stewardship for generations to come. Continue to grant us favor in your sight and let us remain a beacon not only to this nation, but to the world. Let our prayers be according to your will and acceptable in your sight. In your holy name we pray, amen.

Please join me in honoring our nation and the freedoms we cherish by reciting our Pledge of Allegiance. Ready, begin. I pledge allegiance to the flag. of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Thank you, Speaker and Members. As a proud co-author and a member of the Legislative Black Caucus, I rise in support of AJR 31. This is heavy for me. Lifting our voices now is more important than ever given the attacks we are under at the federal level. Just last week, as was already stated, the Supreme Court dealt a major blow to the Voting Rights Act, one of the most important protections we had to undoing racist gerrymandering that that seeks to silence our voices. But let's be clear, the Voting Rights Act has not been erased from the books, but what remains is pretty hollow and unacceptable. The Voting Rights Act recognized the truth about what's supposed to be a system of democracy. It exposes the truth about discrimination. It is often neither loud nor is it obvious. It acknowledges that discrimination hides behind neutrality And it is fed by apathy and oblivion. These behaviors, both, they actually birthed Jim Crow era laws by way of intimidation, district maps, polling tax, voter ID laws, literacy tests, grandfather clauses, white primaries, good character clauses, and felony discrimination. While California does have a state voting rights act to help with states in local elections, this ruling deals a blow to our ability to make sure we are represented in the national elections. This is not just a problem for black Americans, but also for any number of minority voters. Because as we know, black people lead and others reap that benefit. So when we are unable to draw maps that represent the true political will of the people, we see white democratic voices silenced too. So let's take North Carolina, where the number of registered Republicans and Democrats are basically equal but until last year Republicans had a supermajority in that state legislature That is not fairness or equity This is an intentional attempt to silence us Already, Louisiana has moved to redraw maps that could remove the single congressional black seat despite a population that is one-third black. In addition, a number of states are trying to delay their primaries to redraw maps and silence minority voices. And this is all done in the name of race-neutral policies? The method used to redraw the district lines in Alabama, Louisiana, and other southern states is based off of what we know to be census data, which folks claim is race neutral. So to my colleagues from San Diego and also from Clovis, let me be clear that race neutral has never, ever been race neutral. When people fail to realize that census data has a profound impact on the balance of the political power, it's based on the population. The reality is, since this data is not race neutral, that data has, once again, an impact on a balance of power based on population identified by race and not political party. So let's continue to set the record straight. Just because everyone has to abide by the same rule, that does not excuse the unjust impact on certain populations. History has continued to show us this lesson. After the ratification in 1870 of the 15th Amendment, voting barriers that were racially neutral on face were used in Jim Crow South to disenfranchise black voters. The same continues today, even in California, where we face a ballot measure this year to require voter ID. Study after study have shown that in states as diverse as North Carolina, Texas, Michigan, North Dakota, and Indiana, ID requirements were more likely to deter voting amongst Black, Brown, and Native American than other groups. So we must remain forever vigilant and fight back against attempts to silence us and ignore our issues. Black California's issues? I'm tired of saying this over and over again. It's California's issues. This nation is under attack. Our voices are under attack. Our civil liberties are under attack. And the reality is we are now at war. If you don't think we're at war, I think you need to wake up. I never thought that in 2026, my children and I would face the resurgence of Jim Crow. I never thought that I would make it to the floor of the assembly, work to undo decades of discrimination and racism in the form of redlining, overpolicing, intentional diversion of resources and barriers to equal opportunities, all while watching fundamental rights get stripped away at a federal level. We're seeing the Jim Crow era laws that's hell-bent on assaulting black voting power and retaining white supremacy in the electoral process. So when we think about voting rights of 1965, we think about the elevation of our voices as people. As a black woman, I think about the power of our voices as it pertains to ensuring that we elect someone who actually listens. Someone who understands the black experience and lives the lies and understand that lies were lost and fought for justice. The fight for the filling of even moderately similar voting rights require Americans' deadliest war. 30 seconds. Okay. Well, let me skip all of that and get to this point. So when I'm asked to speak about the Rolling Black Voting Rights Act, I find it difficult. And I'm going to say this because it's not because I don't have words to say. Clearly I do. I am a college professor. But it's because I'm at the point of everything has been already said. What more can black Americans tell you to make clear about the frustrations of the pain and the fear and the feeling of our voice purposely being silenced If this is not something that you feel in your heart and in your soul as a clear and present threat to the very fundamental of our democracy then I suggest you ask yourself, why are you even here? Why did 500,000 constituents actually select you to represent you, to represent them? What is your overall purpose? Understand that purpose. And I'm going to close with this. I'm skipping a lot, but it's okay. Let me paraphrase a quote from activist Fannie Lou Hamer who organized the Freedom Summers and also SNCC. If I fall, I'll fall five feet, two inches forward in the fight for our freedom. I'm not backing down. My black voice will not be silenced and I will not be silenced. And I respectfully ask for your aye vote on AJR 31.

Thank you, Mr. Chair and members. And I want to thank our Legislative Black Caucus colleagues for their powerful words today. I was thinking, sitting here as a white woman on this floor, that I appreciate what our colleagues from Clovis said about how representation matters. This past summer, I had the privilege of traveling to Alabama with our Black Caucus. and I walked into the lynching memorial with our colleague from Carson side by side and he said to me, I wonder if my cousin is hanging here. And then he looked at me and he said, do you think you have family here? And I said, no, but let's see if yours is. And it hit me that that lived experience, it's not my lived experience, It was never going to be my lived experience. I have my own trauma. You've all heard about it. But to sit on this floor with people with those lived experiences, it changes us, it makes us better, and it makes the state better. I had the privilege of joining this legislature with Assemblymember Ramos, so I don't know of time when there wasn't a Native person on this floor. and yet I can feel the difference it has made to have him here educating us and raising the voice of California's first people and that is true of everybody on this floor. But I also think it's important to note the power of allies. Yesterday I held a hearing on LGBTQ plus issues and I was a little shy to do it at first because I'm a straight woman. But what was made clear to me pretty quickly was the power of our voice is so strong in these fights. We cannot remain silent. And so I didn't actually plan on speaking, but when our colleague from San Diego raised the Equal Protection Clause as a law professor, I couldn't sit silent because that's not actually what the Equal Protection Clause says. So permission to read, Mr. Speaker?

So the Equal Protection Clause actually says that all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to jurisdiction thereof are citizens. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of a law, nor deny any person the equal protection of the law. Any student of constitutional law knows the precedent, Supreme Court precedent, teaches us that in order to protect people and to ensure they are given the same rights and privileges, the law is actually not race-blind. It is not gender-blind. And interestingly, one of the first cases that made that point was a case where the lawyer was Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and the plaintiff was a man. And that man had been discriminated against. And he brought to the court and he said, I deserve equal protection, and that actually means I need to be treated differently in this context. And the court has repeatedly decided that states can do so in order to procure equal protection under the law. So that's a really critical point as we sit here and debate law on this floor. That not only did my colleagues speak better than I could about the fact that race blind doesn't ever mean race blind. But if we had a court that hadn't been politicized, but instead followed precedent as the law has taught us to do, none of this would be happening today. It is our job to make sure there is representation, to make sure every vote counts, to make sure every vote is heard. And when you draw lines for maps that look like no child in a kindergarten class would ever draw them because they're so insane, because you're trying to silence voices, you are not doing that. You are not ensuring the right to vote. You are not ensuring representation. And you are not ensuring that we will grow and make good laws by being on this floor with people who can teach us things that we never would have known. With that, I respectfully ask for your aye vote.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today on behalf of the beautiful people of Oakland, Alameda, and Emeryville in strong support of Assembly Joint Resolution 31 and inspired by a son of Oakland, Tennessee Representative Justin Jones, a freedom fighter leading the way in Tennessee for black voters who are being silenced as we speak. AJR 31 calls on Congress to enact legislation that restores and strengthens the full protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Let me start with the simple fact that Republicans in Washington seem to have forgotten. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was reauthorized by Republican presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and George W. Bush. A mere 20 years ago, the United States Senate voted 98 to 0, 98 to 0 to restore the Voting Rights Act. This was never a partisan issue. protecting the right to vote was an American imperative. Under this president's, that United States is gone. What we are living through today harkens back to the Confederacy, back to the poll taxes, the literacy tests, the grandfather clauses, back to deliberate, systemic erasure. And let's call it what it is, the opposites of the Civil Rights Act and the acts around that. It is an attempt to erase black political power. Trump is using his court to achieve what Trump's party is too unpopular to achieve at the ballot box. In Louisiana v. Calais, six conservative justices gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the last meaningful shield protecting black voters from racial gerrymandering. The ink was barely dry when they started running at Trump's behest. Tennessee wiped out its only majority black congressional district. Alabama moved to reinstate maps that federal courts had already struck down as unconstitutional and racially discriminatory. This is beyond political tit for tat This is an attempt a coordinated attempt and consolidation of white nationalism The voters this court abandoned are the same voters whose grandparents were literally beaten back from the polls with poll taxes and literacy tests. The same voters whose right to participate in this democracy was purchased with the blood of Martin Luther King Jr., paid for by John Lewis and people whose bodies were hosed down at the Edmund Pettus Bridge and in the soil of this American South. Black elected officials in the United States rose from 1,500 people in 1970 to over 10,000 today. Every single one of those seats was made possible by the Voting Rights Act. That is what they are trying to take back. That is what this fight is about. Our party has been clear-eyed. Our plan to end this back and forth with fair maps for all but federal Republicans have blocked that path time and time again. Still, AJR 31 calls on Congress to do what only Congress can do, and what they have done before, to cross party lines, cross generations, and protect voters of all races. Today that means passing the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. From Oakland to Memphis, from the hood to the holler, an attack on black voters anywhere is an attack on all of us. We will not look away, we will not stay quiet, and we will not go back. California will not be silent. I urge an aye vote.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker and members. The hypocrisy in this room is...

I'm not talking about any member. I'm just saying the hypocrisy is thick in this room right now. Because even the example that you guys are using belies your hypocrisy. Tennessee. You did do exactly what they did in Tennessee. You did take people off of committees. You did chastise Mr. Assaili for banging on his desk when he was being deprived of his ability to make an argument in this body. And yet you're celebrating the guy who brought a megaphone onto the floor in Tennessee to disrupt the proceedings because he felt like his voice was not being heard. You did every bit of the same thing that Tennessee is doing. and now you come here and you chastise and you come and lecture us.

I will refrain from doing that, Mr. Speaker. I hope that's evenly applied because I heard a lot of things here impugning the motives of people on my side of the aisle as well. And I hope that will be evenly applied in this debate. And I sympathize with a lot of the passionate debates on this floor right now because I made them myself. When we were talking about Prop 50, about how you're diluting rural votes and the votes of my community members and people that I represent with Prop 50. The member from the East Bay talked about crazy, insane lines. How about MODOK to Marin? Does that sound like a crazy insane line You drew it and you pushed that through And let just it incumbent upon me a lot of times to just speak the truth on this floor and break through the BS that we too often hear here. Let's talk about Tennessee. You used the example. If this was really about race, if this was really about making sure that black people are represented, the only majority black district in Tennessee that you guys are decrying is represented by a white guy. But he's a Democrat, so it's okay. Because that's what this is really about. The author himself represents a majority white district, which belies the argument. Belies the argument.

Somebody member, Brian, you are recognized. That's just literally not true about the makeup of my district.

Okay, excuse me, Mr. Gallagher.

It's a bit about party. All this is about making sure that either more Democrats get elected or more Republicans get elected. And all the other stuff is just subterfuge, and it needs to stop. and what the supreme court really said is not that the voting rights act is an important legislation it is and it has been supported in a bipartisan way it just simply said that voting rights act doesn't require you to draw districts based on race and let me try to chart a better path forward for all of us let's start drawing districts based on place instead of race let's Start drawing districts based on people instead of party. Because that's what this has really all been about. And the last time the gentleman from Tennessee was here, I talked about this. Super majorities are a really bad thing for democracy. Because when one party has all the power, they use it to shut down the minority party and not let them speak. They do things like drawing lines that are crazy that you guys just did. Instead of making sure that all places, and if we actually drew our districts just based on communities of interest, that's the principle. If we just drew them based on communities of interest alone, that would protect minority communities. That would protect rural communities. But instead, across this nation, and let's talk about where the redistricting battle really started. The entire Northeast run by Democrats was redistricted so that zero Republicans are represented in Congress. That's when it started. And then Texas did their redistricting. But even after Texas is redistricting, 17% are represented by Democrats. That's actually better than it is currently here in California for Republicans. And under Prop 50, you're taking us down to 4%. In the Northeast, it's zero. So who's the one that's drawing these districts so unequally and trying to deprive people of their voices and their rights? It sure as heck is not us. The leading candidate on the Republican Party side that going to represent Memphis is black Thank you Assemblymember Gallagher Thank you

Mr. Speaker, as you know, I...

Yes, Mr. Speaker.

As you know, I do not interrupt.

As you know, I do not interrupt.

As you know, I do not interrupt any members.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I know there's been a lot of theater and theatrics and misbehavior on the floor the last couple of minutes. I'm going to try to bring this back to the actual resolution.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. on behalf of the Legislative Jewish Caucus, I rise in strong support of AJR 31. Long before I became an assembly member or a city council member or a lawyer, I spent a summer as a college student working as an analyst in the voting section of the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice. My job was to review pre-clearance submissions, the voting changes that jurisdictions with a history of discrimination, including here in California, had to get approved before they could take effect. Poll site relocations, changes to registration procedures, voter ID requirements. It might sound bureaucratic, but it truly wasn't. Every submission represented real communities, real voters, often black and Latino voters in counties where not long before their parents or grandparents had been turned away from the polls by violence or by law. That's a story that we have heard so powerfully spoken by our current Secretary of State here in California, Dr. Shirley Weber, about her history growing up in Arkansas. Preclearance was the guardrail. It was government saying, we learned our lesson and we're not going back. Then came Shelby County in 2013, and the guardrail was gone. And last month, the Supreme Court's decision in Louisiana v. Calais gutted what remained of Section 2, the last meaningful check against discriminatory voting practices. Justin Kagan warned in dissent that the ruling renders Section 2 all but a dead letter. As a Jewish American, I think about this through the lens of our own history and our own values. The Torah commands us 36 times to love and protect the stranger because we know what it means to be excluded, to be othered, to be denied full participation in the life of a society. That teaching drove Jewish Americans to the front lines of the civil rights movement. It's why Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, two young Jewish men from New York, gave their lives during the Freedom Summer of 1964, working to register black voters in Mississippi. Their names are in this resolution. Their sacrifice is a part of this story. We're now living in the rainstorm that Justice Ginsburg warned us about after Shelby County in 2013, and Congress has now thrown away the umbrella. AJ31 calls on Congress to restore preclearance, codify a results-based standard under Section 2, and pass the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. It's the least we can do to honor everyone who bled and died for the right to vote. That's why I proudly and strongly urge your iVote on AJR31.

Mr. Speaker, a point of parliamentary inquiry.

In reviewing the ruling you made an admonishment to Mr. Gallagher, I want to inquire as to whether ledge counsel, the parliamentarian, and the Speaker are aware of a May 2025 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in the matter of Libby versus Maine House Representatives, which restricts the ability of the legislature to police free speech. I want to make sure that in our next convening of this body, if this is going to continue to be the opinion of the chair—

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On behalf of the API caucus, I stand in support of AJR 31. And I'd like to simply say that this is not about what we believe in. It's not about believing the best or worst in Americans, although I find it quite shocking if people believe that we truly live in a racially blind society. It's not about what we believe in. It's about what these white segregationists are showing us through their actions, along with those that are allies with these white segregationists who are people of color. We must know our history, and we're in 2026. I'm not going to pretend that people don't know our history anymore.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. You know, my colleague said some things that made me want to speak on this measure. And until those things were said, I was planning on just listening to the debate like I've done most of the time this year. And I'm falling down the rankings of how many words I've spoken this year. But it's true. I don't look kindly upon being compared to racists or segregationists. And the fact that that continues to be allowed, those kinds of things, impugning the motives of Republicans all the time on this floor. It's not just today. It's a very regular basis.

And I can hear my colleagues right now, as I'm discussing this, heckling, heckling things that I'm saying, just like when all my colleagues have spoken today or on other measures.

this resolution i don't think you can nobody here is denying racism exists in this country no one is denying that racism exists in the way seats are created in this country nobody's here denying any of that I just every time we go and we debate these very emotional important resolutions it's hard to clear out some of the things that are very obviously happening within this building and if you can't sit back and reflect on some of the things that have been discussed because of this resolution things that are pointed out in this resolution that happened right here in this building If we can't acknowledge that, I don't know what to tell you. You know, I, okay, I'm going to just say one more thing and then I'll stop. But there is no freedom of speech in this building. And I'm sorry that that makes you feel uncomfortable.

That's what we're speaking on on the floor are the merits of the resolution. Well, I just ask kindly that you go back and you reflect on that this weekend, exactly what I said, and come back. And as we go through the year, we think about exactly that and just watch exactly what's happening. So I appreciate my colleagues bringing this resolution and bringing this debate. I hope it sparks interest way beyond this resolution in our own chambers.

I did it because of my colleagues and the history behind the Voting Rights Act, because of the people that died for our ability to vote, to represent our communities, to have a voice. And this right here, this is what democracy looks like. This is what California looks like. And this is what the country, what this country is about. We are not going backwards. We are moving forward with everything that we have, and what makes America the greatest country on earth is the diversity of this body right here. For those reasons, I rise in support of AJR 31.

Thank you Mr. Speaker thank you to all of my colleagues who spoke on this across the aisle I think we've made it abundantly clear who we are all of us and I take the point of my colleague from Rockland well nobody likes to be characterized or lectured about who they are or what they believe, which is why I also agree with my colleague from Nicholas about what feels like at times hypocrisy. The last words my colleague from Nicholas said were, if you cared about black people. My colleague from Clovis, lecturing the Legislative Black Caucus about the intent of the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment, despite not having a law degree. It wasn't Democrats or Republicans who passed the Voting Rights Act. Let's just be very clear about that. It was black people. It was black mothers, black sons, black preachers, black children who sacrificed everything. They never got tired. They were the ones who believed the best in this country despite seeing the worst. Many are still alive today, by the way, and they are seeing the worst. That is who is telling us what's happening in this moment. I knew John Lewis. Reverend Lawson was a mentor of mine. 20 of us were down with people who marched in Selma, marched in Montgomery just last year. The history and the record of this is clear. And I don't want to hear anything else about meritocracy. Not when somebody who's accused of sexual assault sits on the same Supreme Court as Ketanji Brown Jackson, who's been denied her accomplishments time and time again. Not when a TV reality host sits as president but the first black man to be the head of the Harvard Law Review has his credibility not every single day. There is nothing meritorious about the maps that are coming out of the South. They are racist. That is what they are. You couldn't disenfranchise black people more if you tried to. That's how we know that they tried to. We stand. With our brothers from Tennessee and Memphis and around the country, I can I also tell you that if you tried to disenfranchise the people of South L.A. and silence my voice and prevent us from being represented properly, you would get more than a protest from me. But today I respectfully ask for your aye vote on AJR 31.

Absolutely.

Colleagues, we are joined by a member of the Tennessee State Assembly. He represents Nashville. He's a friend and a hero of mine and the Black Caucus. Please join me in welcoming Justin Jones back to the California Assembly. Thank you.

Take your desk, please. okay we're going to continue on our assembly third greeting file we're going to pass through tandem file items 47 48 49 50 51 52 decorum please file item 53 that's ab 2341 by assembly member fong the clerk will read assembly bill 2341 by assembly member fong an act relating to local government and declaring the urgency thereof to take effect immediately. Thank you, members. Let's give our respectful attention to the author. Thank you, members. Thank you, thank you. Assemblymember Fong, you are recognized.

Thank you, Assemblymember Fong. Members, this is a 54-vote bill. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll tally votes. Ayes 68 no zero on the urgency. Ayes 68 no zero on the measure The measure passes will pass and retain and file item 54 55 56 57 58 file item 59 is AB 1816 by Assemblymember Davies clerk will read

Thank you, Assemblymember Davies. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 56, no 0. The measure passes. We're going to pass through in tandem file item 60, 61, 62, 63, 64. That's file item 65 is AB 2561 by Assemblymember Valencia. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2561 by Assemblymember Valencia, an act relating to privacy.

Thank you, Assemblymember Valencia. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. The clerk will close the roll, tally the vote. I 65, noes 0. The measure passes. Pass and retain on file item 66 all the way through 75. That brings us to file item number 76. That's ACR 167 by Assemblymember Hadwick. The clerk will read. Assembly Concurrent Resolution 167 by Assemblymember Hadwick relative to the World Agritourism Day. Assemblymember Hadwick, just a moment. Thank you, members.

Thank you, Assemblymember Hadwick. Assemblymember, do you wish for the first roll to be open for co-authors?

Members, all debate having ceased, the clerk will open the roll. Members, this is for co-authors. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll and tally the votes. There are 66 co-authors added. Without objection, we'll take a voice vote on the resolution. All those in favor say aye. All those opposed, no. The ayes have it. The resolution is adopted. Assemblymember Hadwick, you are recognized for your guest introduction.

Okay, we are going to continue on with file item number 77, that's ACR 190 by Assemblymember Ortega. The clerk will read. Assembly Concurrent Resolution 190 by Assemblymember Ortega relative to the California Day of the Teacher.

Thank you, Assemblymember Ortega. Assemblymember Quirk-Silva, you are recognized.

Without objection.

Thank you, Assemblymember Quirk-Silva, or Ms. Quirk-Silva to so many. Seeing and hearing no further debate, Assemblymember Ortega, do you wish to close?

Do you wish for the first roll to be open for co-authors?

Okay, all debate having ceased, the clerk will open the roll. Members, this is for co-authors. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. The clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. There are 69 co-authors added. Without objection, we'll take a voice vote on the resolution. All those in favor say aye. All those opposed, no. The ayes have it. The resolution is adopted. Assemblymember Ortega, you are recognized for your guest introduction.

Okay, before we continue with Business on the Daily File, Assemblymember Soria, you're recognized for your guest introduction.

Again, I wanna recognize these young women who are the future of California, our future psychologists, English professors, and lawyers. So welcome to the assembly floor, ladies, Thank you so much for your incredible work. Okay we are going to continue on and pass and retain on file item 78 File item 79, that's AB 1581 by Assemblymember Ramos. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 1581 by Assemblymember Ramos and others, an act relating to pupils. Assemblymember Ramos, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Today I rise to present AB 1581. It focuses on ensuring Native American students are accurately identified in our public schools that has been overlooked here in the state of California. This misclassification equals incomplete data which makes it difficult to allocate resources effectively or tailor educational programs to specific cultural and academic needs. This common sense legislation would implement policies aimed at bringing our state in line with others to ensure California's Native American students are no longer overlooked. And this is why representation matters. I ask for your aye vote. Thank you Assemblymember Ramos. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally votes. They're ayes 69, no zero. The measure passes. Continuing on to file item number 80, that's AB 1586, also by Assemblymember Ramos. Members can you please sit? Members can you please take your desk? Assemblymember Ramos, you are recognized. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Today I rise to present. Excuse me, I'm sorry Mr. Ramos, my mistake. Clerk will read. Assembly Bill 1586 by Assemblymember Ramos, an act relating to people health. Assemblymember Ramos, my mistake, you are recognized. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Today I rise to present AB 1586. It focuses on our school's ability to respond quickly and effectively to an opioid overdose on campuses. AB 1586 would require school resource officers to receive opioid overdose prevention training every two years and directs the Department of Health Care Services to integrate overdose responses into school safety plans. The bill ultimately encourages both law enforcement and schools to have a greater access to remedies to the overdose that is happening and have more trained personnel on campuses within our schools. I ask for your aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Ramos. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the vote, size 68, no zero. The measure passes. We're going to pass your in tandem file items 81, 82. File item 83 is AB 1665 by Assemblymember Pacheco. Clerk will read. Assembly Bill 1665 by Assemblymember Pacheco and others, an act relating to school athletics. Assemblymember Pacheco, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker and members. Today I rise to present AB 1665. part of a bill package focused on student mental health training for coaches The bill package is in partnership with Assemblymember Erwin and Assemblymember Gabriel and includes bipartisan co Children and teenagers are facing a mental health crisis More than 20% of children experience mental health issues and 3 in 10 teenagers report serious psychological distress. And these numbers are increasing. At the same time, the number of young people participating in school sports is on the rise. Athletics are intended to be a fun, physical, and mental outlet, but increased competition and pressure to perform can intensify stress for young athletes. California already recognizes the role that trusted adults play in supporting student mental health. Teachers receive youth mental health training as part of their credentialing process. Coaches also are trusted adults in students' lives. They often spend hours with student-athletes and may be among the first to notice when a young person is struggling. They have the unique opportunity to spot mental health crises and point students toward appropriate resources. School coaches are required to complete training to support student athlete physical health. Yet these safety courses do not include any instruction about how to support student athletes' mental health, even though physical and mental well-being are closely connected. AB 1665 requires sports coaches to complete an approved mental health training course. The bill will equip coaches who see and interact closely with student athletes to recognize when a student may need support. Thank you all, and I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Pacheco. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 62, noes 0. The measure passes. File item 84 is AB 1693 by Assemblymembers Boer. Clerk will read. Assembly Bill 1693 by Assemblymembers Subur and others, an act relating to retailers. Assemblymembers Boer, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members, I am proud to present AB 1693, which will support the state's diverse brick and mortar retail sector. Across California, small businesses and retail establishments face unpredictable local permitting processes for tenant improvements that create hardship, such as increased project costs, delayed business operations, and stagnant economic activity. When unnecessary permitting delays prevent business owners from taking on needed interior improvements to an existing building, it hurts not only the business, but the workforce and the surrounding community. Last year, in a bill authored by our Appropriations Chair, we created a streamlined approval process for restaurants seeking interior tenant improvements. And through the success of AB 1671, establishing a similar model for retail projects will help small businesses to thrive in California. AB 1693 aims to address this by requiring local building departments to allow a licensed architect or engineer serving as a qualified professional certifier to review tenant improvements and certify those improvements for applicable building health and safety codes. This legislation is critical as reducing these permitting delays will promote economic activity throughout the state while maintaining the state. appropriate safety and compliance standards. Members, this bill has been tagged a cost-cutter by the California Chamber of Commerce and has enjoyed significant bipartisan support. I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you. So many members for all debate having ceased. Clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 65, noes 1. The measure passes. We're going to go backwards, members, to file item number 74. That's AB 1768 by Assemblymember Bryan. This is a 54-vote bill. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 1768 by Assemblymember Bryan and others, an act relating to taxation and declaring the urgency thereof to take effect immediately. Assemblymember Brian, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker and colleagues. Today, the federal government has announced that they're withholding $1.6 billion in Medicaid reimbursements from California. That's in addition to other health infrastructure cuts that are disproportionately impacting our state, the poorest communities of our state, and Los Angeles County. The people of Los Angeles County are asking for the right to decide for themselves if they want to take care of their neighbors. And I think we should give them that right and I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you Assemblymember Bryan. Assemblymember Wicks, you are recognized. Thank you Mr. Speaker and members. I just want to rise in support of this legislation. It also includes Contra Costa County. I represent one of the poorest parts of Contra Costa County. My constituents are asking for this. They need this. It is incumbent upon us to put this on the ballot, let them vote for it, ensure that it will pass the SNF test and we can make sure that we are providing that critical social safety net that folks need because of the federal cuts that are coming with that. Respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Wicks. Assemblymember Jeff Gonzalez, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. With respect to this bill, you know, we have challenges here in this state, obviously. The challenge is specifically in my district is that we have a 20% unemployment rate. We have hospitals that are closing down. So I'm looking at this from the lens of, you know, I'm not in favor of more taxation, but we're in a place, a unique place where we have to, I have to think of my district and I have to start saying, what's the right thing? What's the right way in which we go about this? We don't want hospitals to close down. And if LA and Contra Costa County believe this is their fix for their specific region, then I'll support that. the rest of the state can come up with their own initial fixes as well. So with that, respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Gonzalez. Seeing and hearing no further debate, Assemblymember Bryan, do you wish to close? Respectfully ask for an aye vote. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Thank you Clerk will close the roll tally the votes Ayes 54, nos 12 on the urgency. Ayes 54, nos 12 on the measure. The measure passes. Immediate transmittal to the Senate. We're going to go back to file order where we left off. That's file item number 85. That's AB 1712 by Assemblymember Pacheco. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 1712 by Assemblymember Pacheco, an act relating to local government. Members, can I have decorum, please? You may take your conversations off the floor. Let's please give our respectful attention to the authors that have been working so diligently over the course of this year on their bills. Thank you, members. Assemblymember Pacheco, you are recognized. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker and members. Today I rise to present AB 1712, a district-specific bill to help the City of Santa Fe Springs address urgent needs in its water system. Santa Fe Springs owns a water system that faces groundwater contamination issues and requires urgent infrastructure upgrades. However, due to the system's small size, the city cannot afford to finance these upgrades without increasing customer rates by at least 300%. In contrast, if the city sells its system to a larger water provider, the cost of those upgrades will be spread across a much broader customer base, allowing rates to remain steady. However, under current law, a public entity must hold a municipal election before selling its water system to a PUC regulated provider adding cost and delay for the city and its residents. AB 1712 allows Santa Fe Springs to use a protest process instead giving residents a clear opportunity to weigh in while also facilitating a faster more affordable sale. After the sale the water system would be regulated by the PUC which will help ensure reasonable and stable rates for residents. A similar approach was successful in the nearby city of Montebello under AB 850 in 2021, where rates remain stable after the sale. Thank you all and I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you Assemblymember Pacheco. Assemblymember DeMaio, you are recognized. Thank you Mr. Speaker. I plan on voting for AB 1712. I know the author is trying to take a a thoughtful approach to make sure we can have an efficient consolidation of districts. However, when I saw asset sales and water district, it's alarming. In the coming weeks, my office will raise issues about the outrageous sale of water. In the middle of California's drought, and we're never going to be drought-free, a major water system wants to sell our water to other states, wants to sell our water to Mexico, and MET refuses to buy the water. And this water district participates in the MET program, I believe. A question for the author on this bill, I don't believe this bill would involve the sale of water to other states, and if you could clarify that in your closing remarks. Thank you, Assemblymember DeMaio. Seeing and hearing no further debate Assemblymember Pacheco do you wish to close Thank you and I respectfully ask for your aye vote All debate having ceased the clerk will open the roll All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 68, noes 0. The measure passes. Pass and retain on file item 86. File item 87 is AB 1792 by Assemblymember Michelle Rodriguez. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 1792 by Assemblymember Michelle Rodriguez and others, an act relating to people instruction. Assemblymember Rodriguez, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker and members. AB 1792 is a thoughtful and measured approach to how we combat the rise of sexually exploitive AI imaging in today's ever-changing technological and unscathed. Taking an education-first approach, AB 1792 asks the Instructional Quality Commission to consider updating the health education framework to reflect these digital threats such as deep fakes, sextortion, online grooming, and AI-generated exploitation. With your support, the bill ensures that instruction remains age-appropriate, expert-driven, and responsive to the evolving challenges facing students today. It gives educators the tools, the tools they need, and students the knowledge they deserve to safely navigate an increasingly digital world. I respectfully ask for my vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Rodriguez. All debate having ceased, Clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 57, noes 4. The measure passes. Pass or retain on file item 88. File item 89 is AB 1822 by Assemblymember Muratsuchi. The clerk will read. Assembly vote 1822 by Assemblymember Muratsuchi, an act relating to school facilities. Assemblymember Muratsuchi, you are recognized. Thank you very much. As the lead author of Proposition 2 in 2024, the $10 billion statewide school bond measure, I bring forward Assembly Bill 1822, which would simply authorize the State Allocation Board, which administers the Proposition 2 funds, to prioritize projects that include an efficient response to extreme heat conditions faced by many of our schools. this bill has received bipartisan support. No, no votes. Respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you. Assembly Member Maratsuchi. All debate having ceased. Clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. The clerk will close the roll. Tally votes. I 67, no 0. The measure passes. Pass and retain them. File items 90, 91, 92. File item 93. AB 2005 by our friend Assemblymember Ahrens. Clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2005 by Assemblymember Ahrens, an act relating to land use. Assemblymember Ahrens, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker and colleagues. Today I rise to present AB 2005, which is a straightforward bill that aims to address the state's housing crisis by facilitating additional urban lot splits. By addressing unintended technical barriers to implementation of SB 9 while maintaining protection against investor speculation this bill is a crucial step forward in a state where we are in desperate need of more housing Respectfully ask for your aye vote Thank you Assemblymember Aaron Assemblymember Alvarez you are recognized Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise in support of Assembly Bill 2005. I want to thank the author for the focus on tweaking a state law that has not produced housing, at least not what was expected, and identifying ways that actually individuals, people, can have access to housing opportunities. And for that reason, I respectfully ask for your aye vote for AB 2005. Thank you, Assemblymember Alvarez. Seeing and hearing no further debate, Assemblymember Ahrens, do you wish to close? I want to thank my colleague from San Diego, and I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Ahrens. All debate having ceased, Clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. all members vote who desire to vote clerk will close the roll tally the votes ayes 63 knows one the measure passes pass and retain on file item number 94 file item 95 is ab2120 by assembly member solace the clerk will read assembly bill 2120 by assembly member solace an act relating to school district employees assembly member solace you are recognized Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As a former school board member and personal commissioner, I rise to present AB 1220. This bill simply removes the sunset on Los Angeles Unified School District's longstanding selective certification practice. The legislature has extended this practice seven times with unanimous support since 2005. This tool is also utilized by other large marriage system employees, including the federal government and the cities of Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, and Sacramento. The bill includes language to protect these specialized hires during potential reductions of forms, ensuring critical skill sets are not lost due to typical layoff patterns. AB 2120 is a support-support bill, and I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Solache. I'll debate having ceased. Clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. I-69, no zero. The measure passes. That brings us to file item 96. AB-2121 by Assemblymember Berman. This is a 54-vote bill. Clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2121 by Assemblymember Berman, an act relating to community college and declaring the urgency thereof to take effect immediately. Assemblymember Berman, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. AB 2121 responds to federal cuts to minority-serving institutions by removing barriers that prevent community colleges from backfilling this loss in federal funding. Importantly, this bill maintains safeguards for faculty, such as not reducing spending on classroom instructors, adds transparency requirements, and includes a sunset after five years or upon restoration of federal funding, whichever occurs. First, I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Berman. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote. Who desire to vote? All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll. Tally votes. I-62, Noes 1. The measure passes. File item number 97, that's AB 21. Excuse me. Thank you, Madam Clerk. I-62, Noes 1 on the urgency. I-62, Noes 1 on the measure. The measure passes. File item number 97, that's AB 2135 by Assemblymember Kalra. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2135 by Assemblymember Kalra, an act relating to public health. Assemblymember Kalra. Member Colburn, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. AB 2135 makes improvements to the facility-initiated discharge notices residents receive in nursing homes and long-term health care facilities. AB 2135 builds upon federal regulations by setting clear discharge notice requirements when exceptions to the 30-day notice applies. The bill also requires that notices are translated in the language or format the resident can understand and strengthens enforcement of state readmission orders. The bill has enjoyed bipartisan support and is supported by nursing home resident advocates, ombudsmen, and senior and disability rights organizations. And I'm committed to continuing to work with stakeholders with any further concerns in the Senate. Respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Kalra. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tallying the votes. I-61, Nose 1, if the measure passes. Which brings us to file item number 98, 21, AB-2198, by Assemblymember Michelle Rodriguez. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2198, by Assemblymember Michelle Rodriguez, an act relating to insurance. Assemblymember Rodriguez, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for allowing me to present Assembly Bill 2198. Current law requires title insurers and underwritten title companies to file rate schedules with the insurance commissioner. For decades, practice has been clear. Title insurers file title rates while underwritten title companies file escrow rates. Underwritten title companies do not set the title rates. They act as agents on title insurers. Recently, confusion has arisen about whether underwritten title companies must also file title rates. It also creates confusion for consumers trying to understand rate information. AB 2198 codifies longstanding practice and clarifies who is responsible for filing which rates. It also modernizes transparency by requiring rate schedules to be posted and readily available. This bill has received broad bipartisan support and known no votes throughout the process. Thank you, and I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Rodriguez. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 68, no zero. The measure passes. We're going to pass or retain on file items 99 all the way through file item 107. That brings us to file item number 108. File item 108, that's AB 2518 by Assemblymember Sharp Collins. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2518 by Assemblymember Sharp Collins and others, an act relating to public utilities. Assemblymember Sharp Collins, just one second, please. You know, Bernie just let me know that although he did not notice the absence of a quorum, tomorrow is Mr. Wallace's birthday. Happy birthday, Mr. Wallace. We love you so much. 28, right? 28. Dr. Sharp-Collins, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Today I rise to present Assembly Bill 2518, which is a district-specific bill that creates a five pilot program in San Diego County to address the energization delays across sectors When these delays occur critical infrastructure projects such as affordable housing schools and hospitals sit empty despite being ready for public use This means families are left living on the street, children can't get access to the care that they need, and projects cost rise. The bill solves the problem by establishing three distinct project categories which stagger I cannot say the word today, timelines to ensure that we have timely connections. With that, I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Dr. Sharp-Collins. Assembly members of the board, you are recognized. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members, I rise today as a proud co-author of AB 2518, and I want to thank our colleague from San Diego for authoring this bill. This is an important pilot project that will speed up utility connections for affordable housing projects. When we have affordable units ready for occupancy, turning on the lights should not be the barrier to getting people into a new home. I'm appreciative of the electric utility in San Diego for working with the author to develop this pilot project so that affordable housing is expedited and advanced. Thank you again to our colleague from San Diego for bringing this important legislation. I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you, Assemblymember Spohrer. Seeing and hearing no further debate, Dr. Sharp-Collins, do you wish to close? Yes, thank you so much for everyone's support of this bill, and I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you, Dr. Sharp-Collins. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 66, noes 0. The measure passes. We're on file item number 109. That's AB 2577 by Assemblymember Connolly. Members, this is a 54-vote bill. Clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2577 by Assemblymember Colony, an act relating to toxic substances. Assemblymember Connolly, you are recognized.

Thank you, Assemblymember Connolly. All debate having ceased, clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll. Tally the votes. I 67, no 0. Measure passes. Pass or retain on file items 110, 111. File item 112, AB 2706 by Assemblymember Soria. Clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2706 by Assemblymember Soria, an act relating to food safety. Assemblymember Soria, you are recognized.

All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 65, no 0. The measure passes. File item 113, that's AB 2751 by Assemblymember Alvarez. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2751 by Assemblymember Alvarez, an act relating to alcoholic beverages. Assemblymember Alvarez, you are recognized.

Trust me, I could use some of that wine right now. Thank you, Assemblymember Alvarez. Assemblymember Gonzalez, you are recognized.

Thank you, Assemblymember Gonzalez. Assemblymember Alvarez, do you wish to close?

clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. Ayes 65, No, zero. The measure passes. That brings us to file item number 114, AB 2771 by the Committee on Business and Professions, presented by Assemblymember Berman. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 2771 by the Committee on Business and Professions, an act relating to private post-secondary education and making an appropriation, therefore. Assemblymember Berman, you are recognized.

All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll, tally the votes. I-64, no-0. The measure passes. We're going to pass and retain on file item 115, 116, 117. File item number 118, AB 1913 by Assemblymember Soria. The clerk will read. Assembly Bill 1913 by Assemblymember Soria, an act relating to vehicles. Assemblymember Soria, you are recognized.

Thank you, Assemblymember Soria. All debate having ceased, Clerk will open the roll. All members vote who desire to vote. all members vote who desire to vote all members vote who desire to vote clerk will close the roll tally the votes ayes 68 no zero the measure passes just a moment members Thank you. Thank you. . Thank you. Thank you. We're going to pass and retain file items 119, 120, 121, 122. That brings us to the Senate third reading file, file items 123 to 129. We're going to pass and retain on all items. Brings us to the second day consent calendar. We'll now move to the second day consent calendar. First, we're going to take up resolutions on the consent calendar for the purpose of adding co-authors. Clerk, we'll read the resolutions on the consent calendar. Assembly Concurrent Resolution 124 by Assemblymember Ta relative to Vietnam Human Rights Day. Assembly Concurrent Resolution 196 by Assemblymember Solace relative to California Small Business Month. Assembly Concurrent Resolution 198 by Assemblymember Patel relative to Maternal Mental Health Awareness Month. and House Resolution 95 by Assemblymember Colosa relative to National Public Works Week. Clerk will now open the roll to allow any members to add on as a co-author to the resolutions. All members vote who desire to vote. Members, this is for co-authors. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll. There are 65 co-authors added. Moving to a vote on the consent calendar. file items 130 to 181. Does any member wish to remove an item from the second day consent calendar? Seeing and hearing none, the clerk will read the second day consent calendar. Assembly Bill 1559 by Assembly Member Calderon and others, an act relating to insurance. Clerk will open the roll on the consent calendar. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote. Clerk will close the roll and tally the votes. Ayes 66, no 0. Consent calendar is adopted. Clerk will read the remaining items on the consent calendar. Assembly Bill 1569. Ayes 66, no 0. Assembly Bill 1590. Ayes 66 no 0 Assembly Bill 1626 Ayes 66 no 0 Assembly Bill 1694 Ayes 66 no 0 Assembly Bill 1766 I no zero Assembly Bill 1766 I am 1 Mitor I 6 6 no 0 20 78 I 6 6 no 0 2127 I 6 6 no 0 2174 I 6 6 no 0 2191 I 6 6 no 0 ủ соверш religion with othersologia. 23r72, I 6 6, no 0, 24 21 I 6 6 no 0, 24 35 I 6 6 no zero, 24 37 I 6 6 no 0, 466, I 6 6 0, 24 76, I 6 6 no 0, 25 38, I 6 6 no 0, 25 65 I 6 6, no 0, 25 94, I 6 6 no 0, 25 52, Ayes 66, noes 0. Ayes 66, noes 0. Ayes 76, noes 0. Ayes 66, noes 0. Ayes 66, noes 0. Assembly bill 2786. Ayes 66, noes 0. Assembly bill 2789. Ayes 66, noes 0. Assembly bill 2794. Ayes 66, noes 0. Assembly concurrent resolution 124. I-66, no-0 Assembly Adm Platform Resolution 196 I-66, no-0 Assembly Adm vaccin resolution 198 I-66, no-0 House Resolution 95 I-66, no-0 Senate Communцен Resolution 123 I-66, no-0 Senate Commun 끝� resolution 128 I-66, no-0 Senate Communhit Resolution 130 I-66, no-0 Senate Communities Resolution 157 I-66, no-0 And Senate Congreading Resolution 161 I-66, no-0 Members, we will now move to adjournment of memory. The quorum call will be lifted. So you are free to take your conversations off the floor and be on your way. We will move to adjournment of memory. For those who are granted prior permission, assembly members Gibson and Dixon. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Gibson. Ms. Dixon, you are recognized for your adjournment in memory.

Thank you, Assemblymember Dixon. May their memories be for a blessing. Please bring the names to the desk to be printed in the journal. All requests to adjourn in memory will be deemed read and printed in the journal. moving to announcements I'm ordering the desk yelled open to process committee reports members the appropriations committee is meeting in swing space room 1100 upon adjournment session schedule is as follows Friday May 15th no floor session no check-in session Monday May 18th we'll be back here 1 a 1 p.m. for floor session 1 a.m. all other remaining items will be passed and retained all motions shall be continued seeing hearing no further business I am ready to entertain a motion to adjourn miss ransom moves and miss Davies seconds that this house stands adjourned until Monday May 18th at 1 p.m. quorum call has been lifted and this we are adjourned our K hand vote change AB 2005 I to not voting vote change assembly member of our K hand assembly bill 20 oh five from a From A to not voting. From A to not voting. Davies AB 1792 from A to not voting. Vote change, Assembly Member Davies. Assembly Bill 1792 from A to not voting. Castillo, AB2005, from aye to not voting. Vote change. Assemblymember Castillo, Assembly Bill 2005, from aye to not voting. Connolly, vote change. AB1693, no to aye. Aye. Vote change. Assembly member Connolly, Assembly Bill 1692, from no to aye. Thank you. Thank you. . Thank you. Thank you Thank you. Thank you.